Attention and feature binding in the temporal domain.

Alon Zivony, Martin Eimer
Author Information
  1. Alon Zivony: Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.zivony@sheffield.ac.uk.
  2. Martin Eimer: Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that illusory conjunction can emerge for both spatially and temporally proximal objects. However, the mechanisms involved in binding in the temporal domain are not yet fully understood. In the current study, we investigated the role of attentional processes in correct and incorrect temporal binding, and specifically how feature binding is affected by the speed of attentional engagement. In two experiments, participants searched for a target in a rapid serial visual presentation stream and reported its colour and alphanumeric identity. Temporal binding errors were frequent. Critically, when participants reported the identity of a distractor instead of a target, they were also more likely to report the colour of this distractor. This association was observed both within and between individuals. These findings suggest that attentional engagement facilitates the binding of temporally co-occurring features. We discuss these results within a 'diachronic' framework of selective attention, and also consider other factors that contribute to temporal binding errors.

Keywords

References

  1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jul;168:50-64 [PMID: 27155801]
  2. Cogn Psychol. 1982 Jan;14(1):107-41 [PMID: 7053925]
  3. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 12;9(1):11622 [PMID: 31406265]
  4. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jan;150(1):23-41 [PMID: 32700923]
  5. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1448-64 [PMID: 22428668]
  6. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1423-38 [PMID: 16989545]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1879-1889 [PMID: 35581491]
  8. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136 [PMID: 7351125]
  9. Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):11-7, 111-25 [PMID: 10677023]
  10. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):488-505 [PMID: 21604913]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1168-75 [PMID: 20631320]
  12. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:129-33 [PMID: 24365036]
  13. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):38-70 [PMID: 17227181]
  14. Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):210-36 [PMID: 17624321]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1986 Apr;93(2):180-206 [PMID: 3714927]
  16. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Nov;52(5):547-52 [PMID: 1437487]
  17. Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):343-361 [PMID: 30694718]
  18. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):408 [PMID: 36624111]
  19. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1118-1142 [PMID: 34918282]
  20. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):546-60 [PMID: 19883136]
  21. Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105610 [PMID: 37778283]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1452-67 [PMID: 11766936]
  23. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1551-1563 [PMID: 30693440]
  24. Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63 [PMID: 18954206]

Grants

  1. 896192/Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  2. ES/V002708/1/Economic and Social Research Council

MeSH Term

Humans
Attention
Young Adult
Adult
Color Perception
Male
Female
Time Perception
Pattern Recognition, Visual

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bindingtemporalattentionaltemporallydomainfeatureengagementparticipantstargetreportedcolouridentityTemporalerrorsdistractoralsowithinattentionAttentionPreviousstudiesshownillusoryconjunctioncanemergespatiallyproximalobjectsHowevermechanismsinvolvedyetfullyunderstoodcurrentstudyinvestigatedroleprocessescorrectincorrectspecificallyaffectedspeedtwoexperimentssearchedrapidserialvisualpresentationstreamalphanumericfrequentCriticallyinsteadlikelyreportassociationobservedindividualsfindingssuggestfacilitatesco-occurringfeaturesdiscussresults'diachronic'frameworkselectiveconsiderfactorscontributeAttentionalepisodesBinding

Similar Articles

Cited By