Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life Among Infertile Women: A Case-Control Study.

Anupama Bahadur, Sukriti Kumari, Rajlaxmi Mundhra, Kavita Khoiwal, Anindya Das, Ayush Heda, Anjali Pathak, Sakshi Heda
Author Information
  1. Anupama Bahadur: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  2. Sukriti Kumari: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  3. Rajlaxmi Mundhra: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  4. Kavita Khoiwal: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  5. Anindya Das: Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  6. Ayush Heda: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  7. Anjali Pathak: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  8. Sakshi Heda: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Abstract

Introduction Pregnancy holds significant cultural and social value for Women. However, Women facing challenges in conceiving often grapple with emotional distress, including depression and Anxiety. The connection between psychological elements (stress, Anxiety, and depression) and infertility is complex, influenced by multiple factors, and bidirectional. Infertile Women are more likely to develop mental illnesses, marital dissatisfaction, and impaired quality of life compared to the individuals of the fertile group. Thus, the study aimed to assess levels of Anxiety, depression, and quality of life among infertile Women compared to fertile Women. Methods This case-control study conducted at a tertiary care center recruited 100 nulliparous Women between the age group of 20 and 38 years with primary or secondary infertility, while those with male factor infertility were excluded. The control group (N=100) comprised normal parous Women who had at least one child. The primary objective of the study was to assess the impact of infertility on the mental health and quality of life of Women seeking infertility treatment. Outcome measures included standardized tools such as the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire to assess the quality of life across multiple domains (e.g., physical, psychological, social, and environmental) as well as the depression Anxiety and stress Scale (DASS-21) to measure levels of Anxiety, depression, and stress. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the tool's reliability. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Baseline sociodemographic parameters were comparable between the two groups. The mean age of infertile Women was 30.6±3.9 years compared to 31.5±3.2 years in fertile Women (P=0.076). Using the WHOQOL-BREF scale, we found that the quality of life was better in the fertile group compared to the infertile group through all the physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains (P<0.001). The infertile group had a significantly higher number of Women with Anxiety, depression, and stress. The questionnaires showed high internal reliability. Conclusion Infertile Women experienced a lower quality of life in various domains, higher levels of Anxiety, and increased rates of depression compared to fertile counterparts. The study findings underscore the multidimensional impact of infertility, emphasizing the need for comprehensive healthcare approaches to address the psychosocial challenges faced by Women undergoing infertility treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8 [PMID: 9626712]
  2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 24;16(1):73 [PMID: 29690877]
  3. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43 [PMID: 7726811]
  4. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Jul 24;17(1):48 [PMID: 28738833]
  5. Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):888-899 [PMID: 29778388]
  6. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;3(12):e0002680 [PMID: 38079385]
  7. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;38(2):247-251 [PMID: 28920515]
  8. J Reprod Infertil. 2016 Apr-Jun;17(2):123-32 [PMID: 27141468]
  9. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(2):109-112 [PMID: 28326521]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1938-43 [PMID: 15774542]
  11. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 12;15(1):139 [PMID: 28701163]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2151-7 [PMID: 19451130]
  13. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Sep 4;19(1):114 [PMID: 31484531]
  14. Reprod Health. 2014 Feb 28;11(1):18 [PMID: 24576353]
  15. BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):92 [PMID: 29898709]
  16. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;55(2):244-50 [PMID: 27125409]
  17. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(2):106-21 [PMID: 25478076]
  18. Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2810-20 [PMID: 19625314]
  19. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):41-47 [PMID: 29946210]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0womeninfertilitydepressionanxietyqualitylifegroupcomparedfertilestressstudyinfertilesocialpsychologicalInfertilementalassesslevelsyearsdomainssignificantvaluechallengesmultipleageprimaryimpacthealthtreatmentWHOQOL-BREFphysicalenvironmentalDepressionAnxietymeasurereliabilityhigherIntroductionPregnancyholdsculturalHoweverfacingconceivingoftengrappleemotionaldistressincludingconnectionelementscomplexinfluencedfactorsbidirectionallikelydevelopillnessesmaritaldissatisfactionimpairedindividualsThusaimedamongMethodscase-controlconductedtertiarycarecenterrecruited100nulliparous2038secondarymalefactorexcludedcontrolN=100comprisednormalparousleastonechildobjectiveseekingOutcomemeasuresincludedstandardizedtoolsquestionnaireacrossegwellStressScaleDASS-21Cronbach'salphausedtool'sP<005consideredstatisticallyResultsBaselinesociodemographicparameterscomparabletwogroupsmean306±39315±32P=0076UsingscalefoundbetterP<0001significantlynumberquestionnairesshowedhighinternalConclusionexperiencedlowervariousincreasedratescounterpartsfindingsunderscoremultidimensionalemphasizingneedcomprehensivehealthcareapproachesaddresspsychosocialfacedundergoingQualityLifeAmongWomen:Case-ControlStudy

Similar Articles

Cited By