Resolving selfish and spiteful interdependent conflict.

Alexander J Stewart, Charlie Pilgrim, Nichola J Raihani
Author Information
  1. Alexander J Stewart: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. ORCID
  2. Charlie Pilgrim: Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.
  3. Nichola J Raihani: Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Interdependence occurs when individuals have a stake in the success or failure of others, such that the outcomes experienced by one individual also generate costs or benefits for others. Discussion on this topic has typically focused on positive interdependence (where gains for one individual result in gains for another) and on the consequences for cooperation. However, interdependence can also be negative (where gains for one individual result in losses for another), which can spark conflict. In this article, we explain when negative interdependence is likely to arise and, crucially, the role played by (mis)perception in shaping an individual's understanding of their interdependent relationships. We argue that, owing to the difficulty in accurately perceiving interdependence with others, individuals might often be mistaken about the stake they hold in each other's outcomes, which can spark needless, resolvable forms of conflict. We then discuss when and how reducing misperceptions can help to resolve such conflicts. We argue that a key mechanism for resolving interdependent conflict, along with better sources of exogenous information, is to reduce reliance on heuristics such as stereotypes when assessing the nature of our interdependent relationships.

Keywords

References

  1. PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 27;1(4):pgac141 [PMID: 36714856]
  2. Commun Integr Biol. 2017 Nov 3;10(5-6):e1356516 [PMID: 29260800]
  3. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:43277 [PMID: 28233820]
  4. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):429-431 [PMID: 31097813]
  5. Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):eaay3761 [PMID: 32064320]
  6. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):215-8 [PMID: 26168512]
  7. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6 [PMID: 7466396]
  8. J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1507-16 [PMID: 16910981]
  9. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;60:110-120 [PMID: 26339099]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130565 [PMID: 24686941]
  11. PLoS One. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0126907 [PMID: 25993124]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Mar;28(3):190-192 [PMID: 38378379]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819): [PMID: 26582031]
  14. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 01;6:26889 [PMID: 27247059]
  15. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):596-603 [PMID: 33398142]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200819 [PMID: 32546089]
  17. Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1362-7 [PMID: 18323447]
  18. Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1413-4 [PMID: 15353789]
  19. Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Aug 3;2: [PMID: 35669351]
  20. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:151-155 [PMID: 34392064]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jun;122(6):1075-1097 [PMID: 34516185]
  22. Elife. 2019 Apr 09;8: [PMID: 30964002]
  23. Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 14;11(1):915 [PMID: 32060275]
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):455-474 [PMID: 34370502]
  25. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 17;1(3):57 [PMID: 28812731]
  26. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130362 [PMID: 24686934]
  27. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1369-1380 [PMID: 33888880]
  28. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150091 [PMID: 26729931]
  29. Nature. 2010 Aug 26;466(7310):1057-62 [PMID: 20740005]
  30. Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):175-9 [PMID: 9671299]
  31. Curr Biol. 2019 Jun 3;29(11):R438-R442 [PMID: 31163153]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):187-96 [PMID: 11209890]
  33. Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 05;1:191 [PMID: 21833251]
  34. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:226-231 [PMID: 34428709]
  35. Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2016;44:353-364 [PMID: 27445430]
  36. Nature. 2014 Jul 10;511(7508):220-3 [PMID: 25008530]
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):12241-12246 [PMID: 30429320]
  38. Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3 [PMID: 17158317]
  39. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2116851119 [PMID: 35412915]
  40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 29;118(26): [PMID: 34172573]
  41. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar;120(3):626-650 [PMID: 32584097]
  42. Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 22;3:e41 [PMID: 37588562]
  43. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;115(4):716-742 [PMID: 28872331]
  44. Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 25;290(1991):20221834 [PMID: 36651042]
  45. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50): [PMID: 34876507]
  46. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;34(1):6-18 [PMID: 30415827]
  47. J Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;17(6):1195-203 [PMID: 15525404]
  48. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]
  49. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Dec;22(12):643-51 [PMID: 17981363]
  50. Sci Adv. 2022 May 6;8(18):eabm2385 [PMID: 35522740]
  51. Curr Biol. 2011 Jan 11;21(1):72-8 [PMID: 21185192]
  52. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;21(4):361-388 [PMID: 27466269]
  53. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  54. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):825-833 [PMID: 34045721]
  55. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1330-1338 [PMID: 33941909]
  56. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Aug;10(8):336-9 [PMID: 21237061]
  57. Curr Biol. 2020 Feb 24;30(4):691-697.e3 [PMID: 32008900]
  58. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1666-1680 [PMID: 34843365]
  59. Sci Adv. 2020 Dec 11;6(50): [PMID: 33310855]
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):4715-4720 [PMID: 28420786]
  61. Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jun;27(6):583-595 [PMID: 37055313]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interdependenceconflictcaninterdependentothersoneindividualgainsindividualsstakeoutcomesalsoresultanothercooperationnegativesparkperceptionrelationshipsargueInterdependenceoccurssuccessfailureexperiencedgeneratecostsbenefitsDiscussiontopictypicallyfocusedpositiveconsequencesHoweverlossesarticleexplainlikelyarisecruciallyroleplayedmisshapingindividual'sunderstandingowingdifficultyaccuratelyperceivingmightoftenmistakenholdother'sneedlessresolvableformsdiscussreducingmisperceptionshelpresolveconflictskeymechanismresolvingalongbettersourcesexogenousinformationreducerelianceheuristicsstereotypesassessingnatureResolvingselfishspitefulspite

Similar Articles

Cited By