[Communication training in otorhinolaryngology education : Comparison of an online and a classroom-based training course].

Deniz Gür, Christian Offergeld, Götz Fabry, Alexander Wünsch
Author Information
  1. Deniz Gür: Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstraße 8, 79104, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland. denizgur@mail.de.
  2. Christian Offergeld: Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
  3. Götz Fabry: Medizinische Psychologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
  4. Alexander Wünsch: Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstraße 8, 79104, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication skills are among the most important key qualifications of the medical profession. To what extent these can also be acquired online in medical education in otolaryngology is investigated in this study.
OBJECTIVE: A voluntary online training for the teaching of communication skills was compared with a corresponding face-to-face format. The question of the extent to which acceptance of the two formats and students' self-assessment of their communicative skills differed was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the online training, students were prepared for the topic asynchronously via a video. Thereafter, they were able to conduct consultations with simulation patients online and synchronously. The face-to-face training was comparable in structure and duration and took place in an earlier semester. The acceptance of both seminars was assessed by a questionnaire with 19 items on a five-point Likert scale. Self-assessment of communication skills was measured by a 10-cm visual analog scale pre/post with 16 items.
RESULTS: Both formats achieved high acceptance with an average score (M) of 2.08 (standard deviation, SD = 0.54) for the online format and M = 1.97 (SD = 0.48) for the face-to-face event. Students' self-assessments of communication skills showed a twofold increase in the online group (M = 1.54, SD = 0.94) compared to the face-to-face group (M = 0.75, SD = 0.87).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that teaching communication skills in the online format was well accepted and resulted in significant changes in students' self-assessment of communication skills.

Keywords

References

  1. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Nov 16;32(5):Doc56 [PMID: 26604998]
  2. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Dec 24;11:1029-1036 [PMID: 33380859]
  3. HNO. 2021 Mar;69(3):213-220 [PMID: 32929523]
  4. Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538 [PMID: 31526248]
  5. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc83 [PMID: 33364362]
  6. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013 Aug 15;30(3):Doc31 [PMID: 24062811]
  7. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(1):Doc06 [PMID: 22403591]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):271 [PMID: 27756286]
  9. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 May-Jun;55(3):164-77 [PMID: 15890639]
  10. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Nov 16;37(6):Doc57 [PMID: 33225049]
  11. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):84-9 [PMID: 20542402]
  12. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-11 [PMID: 10964998]
  13. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc82 [PMID: 33364361]
  14. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jun;37(2):191-5 [PMID: 14528545]
  15. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Sep 15;37(5):Doc46 [PMID: 32984505]
  16. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1392823 [PMID: 29141516]
  17. MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Dec 27;15:10867 [PMID: 32051850]
  18. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):51 [PMID: 30736764]
  19. GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc21 [PMID: 33659626]
  20. Acad Med. 1999 Feb;74(2):130-41 [PMID: 10065054]
  21. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):336-341 [PMID: 32709566]
  22. Med Teach. 2006 Aug;28(5):e127-34 [PMID: 16973446]

MeSH Term

Otolaryngology
Germany
Curriculum
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Communication
Humans
Education, Distance
Educational Measurement
Male
Female
Physician-Patient Relations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0onlineskillstrainingcommunicationface-to-faceSD = 0formatacceptancemedicalextenteducationinvestigatedstudyteachingcomparedformatsstudents'self-assessmentstudentsscale54M = 1groupBACKGROUND:CommunicationamongimportantkeyqualificationsprofessioncanalsoacquiredotolaryngologyOBJECTIVE:A voluntarya correspondingquestiontwocommunicativedifferedMATERIALSANDMETHODS:preparedtopicasynchronouslyviaa videoThereafterableconductconsultationssimulationpatientssynchronouslycomparablestructuredurationtookplaceearliersemesterseminarsassesseda questionnaire19 itemsa five-pointLikertSelf-assessmentmeasureda 10-cmvisualanalogpre/post16 itemsRESULTS:achievedhighaveragescoreM208standarddeviation9748eventStudents'self-assessmentsshoweda twofoldincrease94M = 07587CONCLUSION:showswellacceptedresultedsignificantchanges[Communicationotorhinolaryngology:Comparisona classroom-basedcourse]DigitaltechnologyMedicalSimulationTeachingVideoconferencing

Similar Articles

Cited By