A generalizable and easy-to-use COVID-19 stratification model for the next pandemic via immune-phenotyping and machine learning.

Xinlei He, Xiao Cui, Zhiling Zhao, Rui Wu, Qiang Zhang, Lei Xue, Hua Zhang, Qinggang Ge, Yuxin Leng
Author Information
  1. Xinlei He: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  2. Xiao Cui: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  3. Zhiling Zhao: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  4. Rui Wu: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  5. Qiang Zhang: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  6. Lei Xue: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  7. Hua Zhang: Department of Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  8. Qinggang Ge: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  9. Yuxin Leng: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected billions of people worldwide, and the lessons learned need to be concluded to get better prepared for the next pandemic. Early identification of high-risk patients is important for appropriate treatment and distribution of medical resources. A generalizable and easy-to-use COVID-19 severity stratification model is vital and may provide references for clinicians.
Methods: Three COVID-19 cohorts (one discovery cohort and two validation cohorts) were included. Longitudinal peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from the discovery cohort (n = 39, mild = 15, critical = 24). The immune characteristics of COVID-19 and critical COVID-19 were analyzed by comparison with those of healthy volunteers (n = 16) and patients with mild COVID-19 using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). Subsequently, machine learning models were developed based on immune signatures and the most valuable laboratory parameters that performed well in distinguishing mild from critical cases. Finally, single-cell RNA sequencing data from a published study (n = 43) and electronic health records from a prospective cohort study (n = 840) were used to verify the role of crucial clinical laboratory and immune signature parameters in the stratification of COVID-19 severity.
Results: Patients with COVID-19 were determined with disturbed glucose and tryptophan metabolism in two major innate immune clusters. Critical patients were further characterized by significant depletion of classical dendritic cells (cDCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and CD4 central memory T cells (Tcm), along with increased systemic interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The machine learning models based on the level of cDCs and LDH showed great potential for predicting critical cases. The model performances in severity stratification were validated in two cohorts (AUC = 0.77 and 0.88, respectively) infected with different strains in different periods. The reference limits of cDCs and LDH as biomarkers for predicting critical COVID-19 were 1.2% and 270.5 U/L, respectively.
Conclusion: Overall, we developed and validated a generalizable and easy-to-use COVID-19 severity stratification model using machine learning algorithms. The level of cDCs and LDH will assist clinicians in making quick decisions during future pandemics.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 27;13:857573 [PMID: 35572561]
  2. J Diabetes Res. 2020 Jun 12;2020:4168340 [PMID: 32626780]
  3. J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103500 [PMID: 32622833]
  4. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:67-74 [PMID: 32950738]
  5. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):605-614 [PMID: 32274126]
  6. Cell. 2021 Apr 1;184(7):1895-1913.e19 [PMID: 33657410]
  7. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022 Dec;33(12):7502-7512 [PMID: 34143742]
  8. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 Jun;107:108655 [PMID: 35248946]
  9. Med Phys. 2010 Jan;37(1):339-51 [PMID: 20175497]
  10. Cytometry A. 2020 Mar;97(3):268-278 [PMID: 31633883]
  11. J Intern Med. 2023 Jul;294(1):21-46 [PMID: 37106509]
  12. Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Jun;7(6):998-1002 [PMID: 34676125]
  13. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Nov;40(11):2764-2775 [PMID: 32907371]
  14. BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339 [PMID: 32907855]
  15. Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 17;13(1):915 [PMID: 35177626]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 08;17(11): [PMID: 32521776]
  17. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 May;188:105267 [PMID: 31841787]
  18. Cell Rep Med. 2022 Jul 19;3(7):100680 [PMID: 35839768]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720 [PMID: 32109013]
  20. Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):904-916 [PMID: 33879890]
  21. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;20(14): [PMID: 32709167]
  22. Neural Netw. 2021 Jul;139:199-200 [PMID: 33774356]
  23. J Leukoc Biol. 2021 Jan;109(1):13-22 [PMID: 33040384]
  24. Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;11(9): [PMID: 34575128]
  25. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1021-1028 [PMID: 32286245]
  26. Postgrad Med J. 2022 Jun;98(1160):422-427 [PMID: 33452143]
  27. Health Care Sci. 2023 Feb 23;2(1):10-24 [PMID: 38939741]
  28. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Aug;21(8):1111-1120 [PMID: 35593184]
  29. Cytometry A. 2015 Jul;87(7):636-45 [PMID: 25573116]
  30. Immunol Lett. 2020 Sep;225:31-32 [PMID: 32569607]
  31. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):211 [PMID: 31694707]
  32. Front Immunol. 2020 May 01;11:827 [PMID: 32425950]
  33. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;32(4):381-386 [PMID: 24658644]
  34. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e2005-e2015 [PMID: 32860699]
  35. Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;13:912336 [PMID: 35757770]
  36. Invest Radiol. 2020 Jun;55(6):332-339 [PMID: 32134800]
  37. Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 1;29(7):R231-R236 [PMID: 30939301]
  38. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513 [PMID: 32007143]
  39. Rev Med Virol. 2023 Nov;33(6):e2477 [PMID: 37706263]
  40. PLoS Pathog. 2021 Oct 6;17(10):e1009742 [PMID: 34614036]
  41. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1033-1034 [PMID: 32192578]
  42. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020 Jul 19;6(1):e12049 [PMID: 32699817]
  43. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Mar;21(3):133-146 [PMID: 36639608]
  44. Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Jun 10;27(6):992-1000.e3 [PMID: 32320677]
  45. Immunology. 2018 May;154(1):3-20 [PMID: 29313948]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Pandemics
Prospective Studies
Leukocytes, Mononuclear
SARS-CoV-2
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
Machine Learning

Chemicals

L-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19=stratificationseveritycellscriticalmachinelearningmodelnimmunecDCsLDHpandemicpatientsgeneralizableeasy-to-usecohortscohorttwomildnextcliniciansdiscoveryusingmasscytometrytimeflightCyTOFmodelsdevelopedbasedlaboratoryparameterscasesstudyclassicaldendriticTlactatedehydrogenaselevelpredictingvalidated0respectivelydifferentIntroduction:coronavirusdisease2019affectedbillionspeopleworldwidelessonslearnedneedconcludedgetbetterpreparedEarlyidentificationhigh-riskimportantappropriatetreatmentdistributionmedicalresourcesvitalmayprovidereferencesMethods:ThreeonevalidationincludedLongitudinalperipheralbloodmononuclearcollected391524characteristicsanalyzedcomparisonhealthyvolunteers16SubsequentlysignaturesvaluableperformedwelldistinguishingFinallysingle-cellRNAsequencingdatapublished43electronichealthrecordsprospective840usedverifyrolecrucialclinicalsignatureResults:PatientsdetermineddisturbedglucosetryptophanmetabolismmajorinnateclustersCriticalcharacterizedsignificantdepletionregulatoryTregsCD4centralmemoryTcmalongincreasedsystemicinterleukin-6IL-6interleukin-12IL-12showedgreatpotentialperformancesAUC7788infectedstrainsperiodsreferencelimitsbiomarkers12%2705U/LConclusion:Overallalgorithmswillassistmakingquickdecisionsfuturepandemicsviaimmune-phenotypingdecision-making

Similar Articles

Cited By