Low-Volume Metastases in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Clinical Significance, and Future Perspectives.

Diletta Fumagalli, Luigi A De Vitis, Giuseppe Caruso, Tommaso Occhiali, Emilia Palmieri, Benedetto E Guillot, Giulia Pappalettera, Carrie L Langstraat, Gretchen E Glaser, Evelyn A Reynolds, Robert Fruscio, Fabio Landoni, Andrea Mariani, Tommaso Grassi
Author Information
  1. Diletta Fumagalli: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. ORCID
  2. Luigi A De Vitis: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  3. Giuseppe Caruso: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. ORCID
  4. Tommaso Occhiali: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  5. Emilia Palmieri: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. ORCID
  6. Benedetto E Guillot: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  7. Giulia Pappalettera: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  8. Carrie L Langstraat: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  9. Gretchen E Glaser: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  10. Evelyn A Reynolds: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  11. Robert Fruscio: Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  12. Fabio Landoni: Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  13. Andrea Mariani: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  14. Tommaso Grassi: Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and mortality are increasing. The prognosis is highly dependent on the disease spread. Surgical staging includes retroperitoneal evaluation to detect potential lymph node metastases. In recent years, systematic lymphadenectomy has been replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and ultrastaging, allowing for the detection of macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Micrometastases and ITCs have been grouped as low-volume metastases (LVM). The reported prevalence of LVM in studies enrolling more than one thousand patients with apparent early-stage EC ranges from 1.9% to 10.2%. Different rates of LVM are observed when patients are stratified according to disease characteristics and their risk of recurrence. Patients with EC at low risk for recurrence have low rates of LVM, while intermediate- and high-risk patients have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with nodal metastases, including LVM. Macro- and micrometastases increase the risk of recurrence and cause upstaging, while the clinical significance of ITCs is still uncertain. A recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVM have a higher relative risk of recurrence [1.34 (95% CI: 1.07-1.67)], regardless of adjuvant treatment. In a retrospective study on patients with low-risk EC and no adjuvant treatment, those with ITCs had worse recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative patients (85.1%; CI 95% 73.8-98.2 versus 90.2%; CI 95% 84.9-95.8). However, a difference was no longer observed after the exclusion of cases with lymphovascular space invasion. There is no consensus on adjuvant treatment in ITC patients at otherwise low risk, and their recurrence rate is low. Multi-institutional, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of ITCs in low-risk patients. Further stratification of patients, considering histopathological and molecular features of the disease, may clarify the role of LVM and especially ITCs in specific contexts.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3692-3698 [PMID: 30116949]
  2. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):53-59 [PMID: 31027899]
  3. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):619-623 [PMID: 32247604]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jun;153(3):670-675 [PMID: 30833134]
  5. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;: [PMID: 38088182]
  6. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;161(2):347-352 [PMID: 33678480]
  7. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39 [PMID: 33397713]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec;131(3):714-9 [PMID: 24099838]
  9. Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):125-36 [PMID: 19070889]
  10. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Mar;170:70-76 [PMID: 36638744]
  11. Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):802-813 [PMID: 28061006]
  12. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018 May;37(3):242-251 [PMID: 28700425]
  13. Lancet. 1999 Sep 11;354(9182):896-900 [PMID: 10489948]
  14. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):1075-1079 [PMID: 34226291]
  15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:77-80 [PMID: 29554604]
  16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;162(2):418-23; discussion 423-6 [PMID: 2309824]
  17. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):383-394 [PMID: 37337978]
  18. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):109 [PMID: 19345353]
  19. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Dec;27(12):1107-12 [PMID: 16524529]
  20. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:77-85 [PMID: 31181536]
  21. JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):157-164 [PMID: 33175109]
  22. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov;119(2):291-4 [PMID: 20708226]
  23. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;147(3):541-548 [PMID: 28965698]
  24. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1704-11 [PMID: 24177256]
  25. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;15(1): [PMID: 36612266]
  26. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jun;153(3):496-499 [PMID: 31230614]
  27. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 May-Jun;16(3):1336-41 [PMID: 16803526]
  28. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):1080-1084 [PMID: 34226292]
  29. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):531-5 [PMID: 22366409]
  30. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Mar;30(3):332-338 [PMID: 31911536]
  31. Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;48:101922 [PMID: 36924642]
  32. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(1):53-7 [PMID: 11876394]
  33. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):234-239 [PMID: 28528918]
  34. Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Feb;80(2):139-44 [PMID: 11161851]
  35. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):313-318 [PMID: 30125949]
  36. Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Aug;62(2):169-73 [PMID: 8751545]
  37. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;15(7): [PMID: 37046712]
  38. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. ;18(2):431-435 [PMID: 28345826]
  39. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1620-8 [PMID: 24126219]
  40. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):394-9 [PMID: 26747778]
  41. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49 [PMID: 38230766]
  42. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76 [PMID: 21489874]
  43. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):475-479 [PMID: 31345606]
  44. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(5):e66 [PMID: 35882605]
  45. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Apr;171:121-128 [PMID: 36893488]
  46. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jun;23(5):964-70 [PMID: 23694985]
  47. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Mar;30(3):291-298 [PMID: 31818860]
  48. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1394-1403 [PMID: 30143441]
  49. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):264-269 [PMID: 35232589]
  50. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1653-9 [PMID: 26714954]
  51. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):e1 [PMID: 25925293]
  52. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1707-16 [PMID: 19033573]
  53. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Aug;22(8):1272-1279 [PMID: 31863354]
  54. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 25;9(6): [PMID: 32630498]
  55. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jul;27(6):1165-1170 [PMID: 28604450]
  56. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):240-246 [PMID: 28577885]
  57. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):196-200 [PMID: 25175452]
  58. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):384-392 [PMID: 28159465]
  59. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):405-415 [PMID: 28566221]
  60. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;150(1):7-8 [PMID: 29540290]
  61. Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Mar;68(3):274-9 [PMID: 9570980]
  62. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):103-4 [PMID: 19367689]
  63. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):506-11 [PMID: 24642092]
  64. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1141-9 [PMID: 20966700]
  65. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jan;104(1):100-3 [PMID: 16963111]
  66. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;146(12):3199-3205 [PMID: 32815026]
  67. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1972-1979 [PMID: 28265777]
  68. Eur J Cancer. 1995 Nov;31A(12):1993-7 [PMID: 8562154]
  69. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):590-598 [PMID: 34274133]
  70. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Aug;96(8):889-92 [PMID: 2775686]
  71. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):980-6 [PMID: 25190122]
  72. Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Feb;80(2):113-20 [PMID: 11161847]
  73. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):163-9 [PMID: 19232699]
  74. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):479-483 [PMID: 27776838]
  75. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):480-486 [PMID: 31324453]
  76. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;119(3):361-369 [PMID: 30508294]
  77. Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73 [PMID: 23636398]
  78. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 May;31(5):744-753 [PMID: 33187974]
  79. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2000 Mar;190(3):193-203 [PMID: 10778803]
  80. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Sep 30;44:101074 [PMID: 36249908]
  81. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Aug;122(2):251-4 [PMID: 21570109]
  82. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1194-1198 [PMID: 30353577]
  83. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Apr;129(1):38-41 [PMID: 23321065]
  84. South Med J. 1999 Feb;92(2):204-8 [PMID: 10071668]
  85. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):206-210 [PMID: 26905211]
  86. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jul 14;113(2):299-310 [PMID: 26172027]
  87. Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Nov-Dec;3(6):341-5 [PMID: 9403046]
  88. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):459-476.e10 [PMID: 27871836]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsLVMITCsriskrecurrenceEClowdiseasenodemetastases95%adjuvanttreatmentEndometrialcancerdiagnosedlymphrecentsentinelultrastagingmicrometastasesisolatedtumorcellslow-volumestudies12%ratesobservedhigherclinicalsignificancelow-riskCIgynecologicmalignancyincidencemortalityincreasingprognosishighlydependentspreadSurgicalstagingincludesretroperitonealevaluationdetectpotentialyearssystematiclymphadenectomyreplacedSLNbiopsyallowingdetectionmacrometastasesMicrometastasesgroupedreportedprevalenceenrollingonethousandapparentearly-stageranges9%10DifferentstratifiedaccordingcharacteristicsPatientsintermediate-high-risklikelihoodnodalincludingMacro-increasecauseupstagingstilluncertainmeta-analysisfoundrelative[134CI:07-167]regardlessretrospectivestudyworserecurrence-freesurvivalcomparednode-negative851%738-982versus90849-958HoweverdifferencelongerexclusioncaseslymphovascularspaceinvasionconsensusITCotherwiserateMulti-institutionalprospectivewarrantedevaluatestratificationconsideringhistopathologicalmolecularfeaturesmayclarifyroleespeciallyspecificcontextsLow-VolumeMetastasesApparentEarly-StageCancer:PrevalenceClinicalSignificanceFuturePerspectivesendometrialmetastasismicrometastasismapping

Similar Articles

Cited By