Trust-building in temporary public health partnerships: a qualitative study of the partnership formation process of a Covid-19 test, trace and protect service.

Eva Krczal, Doris A Behrens
Author Information
  1. Eva Krczal: Department for Economy and Health, University of Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria. eva.krczal@donau-uni.ac.at.
  2. Doris A Behrens: Department for Economy and Health, University of Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health initiatives require coordinated efforts from healthcare, social services and other service providers. Organisational theory tells us that trust is essential for reaching collaborative effectiveness. This paper explores the drivers for initiating and sustaining trust in a temporary public health partnership, in response to a sudden health threat.
METHODS: This qualitative study analysed the formation process of a multisector partnership for a Covid-19 contact tracing service. Data was collected through 12 interviews, two focus groups, one feedback workshop, and an online survey with workforce members from all seven partner organisations. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used to capture the reflections and experiences of workforce members from all seven partner organisations. A deductive code scheme was used to identify drivers for building and sustaining trust in inter-organisational collaboration.
RESULTS: Relational mechanisms emanating from the commitment to the common aim, shared norms and values, and partnership structures affected trust-building. Shared values and the commitment to the common aim appeared to channel partners' behaviour when interacting, resulting in being perceived as a fair, reliable and supportive partner. Shared values were congruent with the design of the partnership in terms of governance structure and communication lines reflecting flat hierarchies and shared decision-making power. Tensions between partner organisations arose when shared values were infringed.
CONCLUSIONS: When managing trust in a collaboration, partners should consider structural components like governance structure, organisational hierarchy, and communication channels to ensure equal power distribution. Job rotation, recruitment of candidates with the desired personality traits and attitudes, as well as training and development, encourage inter-organisational networking among employees, which is essential for building and strengthening relationships with partner organisations. Partners should also be aware of managing relational dynamics, channelling behaviours through shared values, objectives and priorities and fostering mutual support and equality among partner organisations.

Keywords

References

  1. J Nurs Manag. 2008 Jan;16(1):72-83 [PMID: 18211338]
  2. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:70-83 [PMID: 29202313]
  3. Health Policy. 2021 Feb;125(2):239-245 [PMID: 33390279]
  4. Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 22;10(1):82 [PMID: 33752755]
  5. Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22 [PMID: 26184336]
  6. Schmalenbach Z Betriebswirtsch Forsch. 2022;74(4):465-495 [PMID: 35431408]
  7. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e065635 [PMID: 36316079]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):779-86 [PMID: 20056304]
  9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 16;18(1):68 [PMID: 32546163]
  10. J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):241-250 [PMID: 31329471]
  11. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 13;12:63 [PMID: 22413897]
  12. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e029174 [PMID: 32152152]
  13. Int J Integr Care. 2011 Oct;11:e137 [PMID: 22128280]
  14. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):5 [PMID: 29632455]
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):385 [PMID: 31200699]
  16. Health Info Libr J. 2004 Jun;21 Suppl 1:3-19 [PMID: 15186286]
  17. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Jan;26(1):4-11 [PMID: 32508182]
  18. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012 Oct;13(4):327-46 [PMID: 22353204]
  19. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205, III-IV [PMID: 11439464]
  20. Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):755-781 [PMID: 30537369]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):753 [PMID: 33874927]
  22. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jan-Mar;21(1):75-88 [PMID: 16604850]
  23. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):602 [PMID: 34174873]
  24. Health Promot Int. 2015 Dec;30(4):868-80 [PMID: 24760546]

MeSH Term

Humans
Trust
Public Health
COVID-19
Qualitative Research
Focus Groups

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0partnerhealthpartnershiporganisationsvaluestrustsharedservicePublicessentialdriverssustainingtemporarypublicqualitativestudyformationprocessCovid-19workforcememberssevenusedbuildinginter-organisationalcollaborationcommitmentcommonaimSharedgovernancestructurecommunicationpowermanagingamongBACKGROUND:initiativesrequirecoordinatedeffortshealthcaresocialservicesprovidersOrganisationaltheorytellsusreachingcollaborativeeffectivenesspaperexploresinitiatingresponsesuddenthreatMETHODS:analysedmultisectorcontacttracingDatacollected12interviewstwofocusgroupsonefeedbackworkshoponlinesurveyPurposivemaximumvariationsamplingcapturereflectionsexperiencesdeductivecodeschemeidentifyRESULTS:Relationalmechanismsemanatingnormsstructuresaffectedtrust-buildingappearedchannelpartners'behaviourinteractingresultingperceivedfairreliablesupportivecongruentdesigntermslinesreflectingflathierarchiesdecision-makingTensionsaroseinfringedCONCLUSIONS:partnersconsiderstructuralcomponentslikeorganisationalhierarchychannelsensureequaldistributionJobrotationrecruitmentcandidatesdesiredpersonalitytraitsattitudeswelltrainingdevelopmentencouragenetworkingemployeesstrengtheningrelationshipsPartnersalsoawarerelationaldynamicschannellingbehavioursobjectivesprioritiesfosteringmutualsupportequalityTrust-buildingpartnerships:testtraceprotectCollaborationCultureHealthcaresectorPartnershipTrust

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.