Age-inclusive Arctic outdoor spaces: a policy review in four Nordic countries.

Anastasia Emelyanova, Bodil H Blix, Agneta Larsson, Steinunn A Olafsdottir, Arja Rautio
Author Information
  1. Anastasia Emelyanova: Thule Institute, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. ORCID
  2. Bodil H Blix: Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. ORCID
  3. Agneta Larsson: Division of Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden. ORCID
  4. Steinunn A Olafsdottir: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland. ORCID
  5. Arja Rautio: Arctic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Abstract

In the last decade, policy strategies were adopted in response to population ageing in the Nordic countries. Governmental actions have to be evaluated in terms of their efficacy. The objective of this article is to identify and review the policies related to age-inclusive outdoor spaces in the Arctic regions of Nordic countries. Our analysis focuses on central government white papers that address the older adults in Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. A review of such policy documents provides insights into the predominant understandings of older adults and healthy ageing. Moreover, such analysis may identify "blind spots" in the national policies, especially regarding the sparsely researched northernmost and rural Arctic territories. Our results demonstrate how the older populations in the Nordic Arctic and their access to outdoor spaces are addressed in the policy documents. We found that with few exceptions, the older people of the rural Arctic is strikingly absent in the Nordic national governmental papers. Moreover, access to outdoor spaces is mentioned in general terms, and specific challenges of the rural Arctic context, such as the harsh climate, long winters and geographical distances are not addressed. The noticed omissions might be the result of "urban-rural", "south-north", "indoor-outdoor", and "generalisation" biases.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21): [PMID: 36360692]
  2. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231866 [PMID: 32330167]
  3. Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):283-91 [PMID: 22356449]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 02;16(23): [PMID: 31810348]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 27;17(5): [PMID: 32121001]
  6. J Aging Stud. 2015 Aug;34:199-205 [PMID: 26162742]
  7. Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;92(4):551-62 [PMID: 22173796]

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Arctic Regions
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
Finland
Iceland
Policy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ArcticNordicolderpolicyoutdoorruralcountriesreviewspacesageingtermsidentifypoliciesanalysispapersadultsFinlandNorwaySwedenIcelanddocumentsMoreovernationalaccessaddressedlastdecadestrategiesadoptedresponsepopulationGovernmentalactionsevaluatedefficacyobjectivearticlerelatedage-inclusiveregionsfocusescentralgovernmentwhiteaddressprovidesinsightspredominantunderstandingshealthymay"blindspots"especiallyregardingsparselyresearchednorthernmostterritoriesresultsdemonstratepopulationsfoundexceptionspeoplestrikinglyabsentgovernmentalmentionedgeneralspecificchallengescontextharshclimatelongwintersgeographicaldistancesnoticedomissionsmightresult"urban-rural""south-north""indoor-outdoor""generalisation"biasesAge-inclusivespaces:fourAge-friendlyindividuals

Similar Articles

Cited By