Factors associated with testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and evaluation of a recruitment protocol among healthcare personnel in a COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study.

Morgan M Millar, Jeanmarie Mayer, Jacob Crook, Kristina M Stratford, Tavis Huber, Matthew H Samore
Author Information
  1. Morgan M Millar: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. ORCID
  2. Jeanmarie Mayer: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  3. Jacob Crook: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  4. Kristina M Stratford: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  5. Tavis Huber: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  6. Matthew H Samore: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare personnel. Secondary objectives were to assess representativeness of recruited participants and the effectiveness of a multiple-contact protocol for recruiting healthcare personnel in this COVID-19 study.
Design: Survey study, conducted as part of an observational test-negative study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
Setting: University of Utah Health system, including both inpatient and outpatient facilities.
Participants: Clinical and non-clinical healthcare personnel at University of Utah Health. 1456 were contacted and 503 (34.5%) completed the survey. Cases were all eligible employees testing positive for COVID-19, with 3:1 randomly selected, matched controls (test negative) selected weekly.
Methods: Online survey.
Results: Significant differences in the demographics of participants and the source population were observed; e.g., nursing staff comprised 31.6% of participants but only 23.3% of the source population. The multiple-contact recruitment protocol increased participation by ten percentage points and ensured equal representation of controls. Potential exposure to illness outside of work was strongly predictive of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 3.74; 95% CI: 2.29, 6.11) whereas potential exposure at work was protective against testing positive (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.88).
Conclusions: Carefully designed recruitment protocols increase participation and representation of controls, but bias in participant demographics still exists. The negative association between potential workplace exposure and positive test suggests testing bias in the test-negative design. Healthcare personnel's potential exposures to COVID-19 outside of the workplace are important predictors of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 21;21(1):719 [PMID: 34289840]
  2. Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug;47(4):1739-54 [PMID: 22250782]
  3. Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(6):1227-1234 [PMID: 36073241]
  4. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0257513 [PMID: 34634076]
  5. Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407 [PMID: 23975761]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):MR000008 [PMID: 19588449]
  7. Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;187(12):2686-2697 [PMID: 30099505]
  8. Med Clin (Barc). 2021 May 7;156(9):449-458 [PMID: 33478809]
  9. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 21;70(20):753-758 [PMID: 34014909]
  10. Front Surg. 2021 Aug 12;8:690680 [PMID: 34458314]
  11. Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e75-e81 [PMID: 32649458]
  12. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;44(4):240-251 [PMID: 34149038]
  13. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 11;69(49):1857-1859 [PMID: 33301429]
  14. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 02;4(8):e2121931 [PMID: 34459907]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 05;17(23): [PMID: 33291511]
  16. Ann Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;9(3):188-95 [PMID: 10192651]
  17. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 30;10(12):e046620 [PMID: 33380488]
  18. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 01;2(1):e188 [PMID: 36505945]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):e90 [PMID: 34551224]
  20. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Apr;66(4):290-5 [PMID: 20961872]
  21. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211283 [PMID: 33688967]
  22. J Hosp Infect. 2021 Feb;108:120-134 [PMID: 33212126]

Grants

  1. UM1 TR004409/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testingpositivestudyCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2healthcarepersonnelparticipantseffectivenessprotocolcontrolsrecruitmentexposurepotential0associatedamongmultiple-contacttest-negativevaccineUniversityUtahHealthsurveyselectedtestnegativedemographicssourcepopulationparticipationrepresentationoutsidework95%CI:29biasworkplaceObjective:objectivedeterminefactorsSecondaryobjectivesassessrepresentativenessrecruitedrecruitingDesign:SurveyconductedpartobservationalSetting:systemincludinginpatientoutpatientfacilitiesParticipants:Clinicalnon-clinical1456contacted503345%completedCaseseligibleemployees3:1randomlymatchedweeklyMethods:OnlineResults:Significantdifferencesobservedegnursingstaffcomprised316%233%increasedtenpercentagepointsensuredequalPotentialillnessstronglypredictiveOR=3742611whereasprotectiveOR:5188Conclusions:CarefullydesignedprotocolsincreaseparticipantstillexistsassociationsuggestsdesignHealthcarepersonnel'sexposuresimportantpredictorsseropositivityFactorsevaluation

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)