Effects of relational and instrumental messaging on human perception of rattlesnakes.

Erin B Allison, Emily N Taylor, Zackary A Graham, Melissa Amarello, Jeffrey J Smith, Zachary J Loughman
Author Information
  1. Erin B Allison: Dept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America.
  2. Emily N Taylor: Biological Sciences Dept, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America.
  3. Zackary A Graham: Dept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America. ORCID
  4. Melissa Amarello: Advocates for Snake Preservation, Silver City, NM, United States of America.
  5. Jeffrey J Smith: Advocates for Snake Preservation, Silver City, NM, United States of America. ORCID
  6. Zachary J Loughman: Dept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America.

Abstract

We tested the effects of relational and instrumental message strategies on US residents' perception of rattlesnakes-animals that tend to generate feelings of fear, disgust, or hatred but are nevertheless key members of healthy ecosystems. We deployed an online survey to social media users (n = 1,182) to describe perceptions of rattlesnakes and assess the change after viewing a randomly selected relational or instrumental video message. An 8-item, pre-and post-Rattlesnake Perception Test (RPT) evaluated perception variables along emotional, knowledge, and behavioral gradients on a 5-point Likert scale; the eight responses were combined to produce an Aggregate Rattlesnake Perception (ARP) score for each participant. We found that people from Abrahamic religions (i.e., Christianity, Judaism, Islam) and those identifying as female were associated with low initial perceptions of rattlesnakes, whereas agnostics and individuals residing in the Midwest region and in rural residential areas had relatively favorable perceptions. Overall, both videos produced positive changes in rattlesnake perception, although the instrumental video message led to a greater increase in ARP than the relational message. The relational message was associated with significant increases in ARP only among females, agnostics, Baby Boomers (age 57-75), and Generation-Z (age 18-25 to exclude minors). The instrumental video message was associated with significant increases in ARP, and this result varied by religious group. ARP changed less in those reporting prior experience with a venomous snake bite (to them, a friend, or a pet) than in those with no such experience. Our data suggest that relational and instrumental message strategies can improve people's perceptions of unpopular and potentially dangerous wildlife, but their effectiveness may vary by gender, age, religious beliefs, and experience. These results can be used to hone and personalize communication strategies to improve perceptions of unpopular wildlife species.

References

  1. Anim Conserv. 2021 Dec;24(6):937-945 [PMID: 34177353]
  2. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183962 [PMID: 28854227]
  3. Top Companion Anim Med. 2013 Nov;28(4):167-76 [PMID: 24331557]
  4. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Jun 20;12(1):25 [PMID: 27324788]
  5. Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 16;9:333 [PMID: 29615942]
  6. Br J Psychol. 2020 May;111(2):297-321 [PMID: 31183857]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 9;113(6):1462-5 [PMID: 26862158]
  8. Dev Psychol. 2022 Nov;58(11):2140-2157 [PMID: 35951400]
  9. Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1131-1141 [PMID: 32043648]
  10. Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):724-33 [PMID: 26400623]
  11. Dev Psychol. 2001 Jul;37(4):451-63 [PMID: 11444482]
  12. Front Psychol. 2019 May 09;10:1085 [PMID: 31143154]
  13. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:670-678 [PMID: 29197286]
  14. Psychiatry Res. 2016 Aug 30;242:163-168 [PMID: 27280527]
  15. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Feb 08;8:8 [PMID: 22316318]
  16. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245074 [PMID: 33465097]
  17. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Mar 27;10:30 [PMID: 24673877]
  18. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 1;763:143045 [PMID: 33121773]
  19. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):411-8 [PMID: 17046413]
  20. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 May;31(5):366-371 [PMID: 26936225]
  21. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9132 [PMID: 28831097]
  22. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180168 [PMID: 28662124]
  23. Bioessays. 2011 Apr;33(4):269-79 [PMID: 21271609]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:453-84 [PMID: 15709943]
  25. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 9;13(7):e0199149 [PMID: 29985962]
  26. Behav Res Ther. 1988;26(3):245-51 [PMID: 3408459]
  27. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93 [PMID: 17592961]
  28. Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 24;11:1277 [PMID: 32670150]
  29. Conserv Biol. 2022 Oct;36(5):e13910 [PMID: 35307865]

MeSH Term

Animals
Humans
Female
Adolescent
Young Adult
Adult
Middle Aged
Aged
Crotalus
Ecosystem
Animals, Wild
Communication
Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0messagerelationalinstrumentalperceptionsARPperceptionstrategiesrattlesnakesvideoassociatedageexperiencePerceptionagnosticssignificantincreasesreligiouscanimproveunpopularwildlifetestedeffectsUSresidents'rattlesnakes-animalstendgeneratefeelingsfeardisgusthatredneverthelesskeymembershealthyecosystemsdeployedonlinesurveysocialmediausersn=1182describeassesschangeviewingrandomlyselected8-itempre-andpost-RattlesnakeTestRPTevaluatedvariablesalongemotionalknowledgebehavioralgradients5-pointLikertscaleeightresponsescombinedproduceAggregateRattlesnakescoreparticipantfoundpeopleAbrahamicreligionsieChristianityJudaismIslamidentifyingfemalelowinitialwhereasindividualsresidingMidwestregionruralresidentialareasrelativelyfavorableOverallvideosproducedpositivechangesrattlesnakealthoughledgreaterincreaseamongfemalesBabyBoomers57-75Generation-Z18-25excludeminorsresultvariedgroupchangedlessreportingpriorvenomoussnakebitefriendpetdatasuggestpeople'spotentiallydangerouseffectivenessmayvarygenderbeliefsresultsusedhonepersonalizecommunicationspeciesEffectsmessaginghuman

Similar Articles

Cited By