Learning verbs in English and Korean: The roles of word order and argument drop.

Huanhuan Shi, Angela Xiaoxue He, Hyun-Joo Song, Kyong-Sun Jin, Sudha Arunachalam
Author Information
  1. Huanhuan Shi: Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, USA.
  2. Angela Xiaoxue He: Department of English Language and Literature, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
  3. Hyun-Joo Song: Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
  4. Kyong-Sun Jin: Department of Psychology, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, South Korea.
  5. Sudha Arunachalam: Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, USA.

Abstract

To learn new words, particularly verbs, child learners have been shown to benefit from the linguistic contexts in which the words appear. However, cross-linguistic differences affect how this process unfolds. One previous study found that children's abilities to learn a new verb differed across Korean and English as a function of the sentence in which the verb occurred (Arunachalam et al., 2013). The authors hypothesized that the properties of word order and argument drop, which vary systematically in these two languages, were driving the differences. In the current study, we pursued this finding to ask if the difference persists later in development, or if children acquiring different languages come to appear more similar as their linguistic knowledge and learning capacities increase. Preschool-aged monolingual English learners (N = 80) and monolingual Korean learners (N = 64) were presented with novel verbs in contexts that varied in word order and argument drop and accompanying visual stimuli. We assessed their learning by measuring accuracy in a forced-choice pointing task, and we measured eye gaze during the learning phase as an indicator of the processes by which they mapped the novel verbs to meaning. Unlike previous studies which identified differences between English and Korean learning 2-year-olds in a similar task, our results revealed similarities between the two language groups with these older preschoolers. We interpret our results as evidence that over the course of early childhood, children become adept at learning from a larger variety of contexts, such that differences between learners of different languages are attenuated.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Sci. 2022 Mar;25(2):e13176 [PMID: 34592047]
  2. Cognition. 2007 May;103(2):163-79 [PMID: 16677623]
  3. J Child Lang. 2018 Jan;45(1):174-203 [PMID: 28606194]
  4. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2019 Dec;4(6):1239-1249 [PMID: 37304204]
  5. J Child Lang. 1990 Jun;17(2):357-74 [PMID: 2380274]
  6. Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 4:831-854 [PMID: 26898131]
  7. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 05;7:97 [PMID: 26903905]
  8. J Child Lang. 1997 Jun;24(2):427-39 [PMID: 9308426]
  9. Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12697 [PMID: 30039901]
  10. Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):979-1000 [PMID: 18717902]
  11. Cognition. 1999 Jun 22;71(2):73-108 [PMID: 10444905]
  12. J Cogn Dev. 2016;17(1):41-66 [PMID: 27092030]
  13. Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):85-94 [PMID: 22525312]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13399-13404 [PMID: 32482876]
  15. Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 4:808-830 [PMID: 27457679]
  16. Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):748-65 [PMID: 10560327]
  17. Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104251 [PMID: 32416399]
  18. Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):1028-37 [PMID: 17537422]
  19. Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:71-87 [PMID: 27513871]
  20. Child Dev. 1993 Dec;64(6):1665-87 [PMID: 8112112]
  21. Child Dev. 1984 Apr;55(2):341-54 [PMID: 6723440]
  22. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90 [PMID: 17517438]
  23. J Mem Lang. 2016 Jun 1;88:104-116 [PMID: 26917862]
  24. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186129 [PMID: 29049390]
  25. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 May;106(1):41-61 [PMID: 20163806]
  26. Cognition. 1999 Dec 7;73(2):89-134 [PMID: 10580160]
  27. Lang Acquis. 2015 Apr 1;22(2):117-131 [PMID: 25983528]
  28. Cogn Psychol. 2019 Dec;115:101238 [PMID: 31539813]
  29. J Child Lang. 2008 May;35(2):291-323 [PMID: 18416861]
  30. Lang Learn Dev. 2011 Jul;7(1):169-184 [PMID: 22096450]
  31. J Child Lang. 2012 Jun;39(3):637-63 [PMID: 21910951]
  32. Lang Acquis. 2013;20(4):292-304 [PMID: 25320551]
  33. Lang Learn Dev. 2020;16(1):22-42 [PMID: 33013240]
  34. J Child Lang. 2006 Nov;33(4):823-57 [PMID: 17153863]
  35. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:138 [PMID: 26909053]
  36. Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):975-984 [PMID: 34212788]
  37. Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):340-55 [PMID: 15784086]

Grants

  1. R01 DC016592/NIDCD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningverbslearnersdifferencesKoreanEnglishwordcontextsorderargumentdroplanguageslearnnewwordslinguisticappearcross-linguisticpreviousstudyverbtwochildrendifferentsimilarmonolingualN=noveltaskresultslanguageparticularlychildshownbenefitHoweveraffectprocessunfoldsOnefoundchildren'sabilitiesdifferedacrossfunctionsentenceoccurredArunachalametal2013authorshypothesizedpropertiesvarysystematicallydrivingcurrentpursuedfindingaskdifferencepersistslaterdevelopmentacquiringcomeknowledgecapacitiesincreasePreschool-aged8064presentedvariedaccompanyingvisualstimuliassessedmeasuringaccuracyforced-choicepointingmeasuredeyegazephaseindicatorprocessesmappedmeaningUnlikestudiesidentified2-year-oldsrevealedsimilaritiesgroupsolderpreschoolersinterpretevidencecourseearlychildhoodbecomeadeptlargervarietyattenuatedLearningKorean:rolesacquisitionsyntacticbootstrapping

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.