Effects of active exergames on physical performance in older people: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Jordan Hernandez-Martinez, Francisco Ramos-Espinoza, Cristopher Mu��oz-V��squez, Eduardo Guzman-Mu��oz, Tomas Herrera-Valenzuela, Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, Maria Castillo-Cerda, Pablo Vald��s-Badilla
Author Information
  1. Jordan Hernandez-Martinez: Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile.
  2. Francisco Ramos-Espinoza: Doctoral Program in Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cat��lica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
  3. Cristopher Mu��oz-V��squez: Department of Health, Programa de Prevenci��n y Rehabilitaci��n Cardiovascular, CESFAM Dr. Juan Carlos Baeza, San Clemente, Chile.
  4. Eduardo Guzman-Mu��oz: Faculty of Health, School of Kinesiology, Universidad Santo Tom��s, Talca, Chile.
  5. Tomas Herrera-Valenzuela: Department of Physical Activity, Sports and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
  6. Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco: Graduate Program in Health Promotion, Cesumar University (UniCesumar), Maring��, Brazil.
  7. Maria Castillo-Cerda: Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile.
  8. Pablo Vald��s-Badilla: Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Education Sciences, Universidad Cat��lica del Maule, Talca, Chile.

Abstract

This overview assessed the available body of published peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the effects of active exergames compared with active/passive control on physical performance outcomes in older people. The methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using PRISMA, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (code: CRD42023391694). The main outcomes indicate that 4,477 records, five systematic reviews, and 10 meta-analyses were included. The AMSTAR-2 reported six meta-analyses with high methodological quality, four moderate quality, two systematic reviews with low quality, and three very-low quality. Meta-analysis was performed on balance using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) tests, on cardiorespiratory fitness using the 6-min walk test, and on upper and lower limbs muscle strength using the handgrip strength, knee extension, and 30-s chair stand tests. Significant differences in favor of the active exergames groups concerning active/passive groups were reported in BBS (SMD���=���0.85; 95% CI���=���0.12-1.58; I =���96%; ���=���0.02), TUG (SMD���=���1.44; 95% CI���=���0.71-2.16; I =���97%; ���<���0.0001), and 30-s chair stand test (SMD���=���0.79; 95% CI���=���0.33-1.25; I =���88%; ���=���0.0008). However, no significant differences were reported in favor of the active exergames groups in 6-min walk (SMD���=���0.93; 95% CI���=���-0.64 to 2.50; I =���95%; ���=���0.24), handgrip strength (SMD���=���0.67; 95% CI���=���-0.04 to 1.38; I =���84%; ���=���0.06), and knee extension tests (SMD���=���0.20; 95% CI���=���-0.05 to 0.44; I =���95%; ���=���0.12) compared to active/passive control. However, it was impossible to perform a meta-analysis for the variables of walking speed as a fall risk due to the diversity of instruments and the small number of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. In conclusion, interventions utilizing active exergames have shown significant improvements in the static and dynamic balance and lower limb muscle strength of apparently healthy older people, compared to control groups of active/inactive participants, as measured by BBS, TUG, and 30-s chair stand tests. However, no significant differences were found in the 6-min walk, HGS, and knee extension tests.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023391694.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Nov-Dec;103:104796 [PMID: 36058045]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 08;17(7): [PMID: 32276515]
  3. Aging Ment Health. 2022 Jul;26(7):1306-1317 [PMID: 34291684]
  4. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  5. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Jun;14(3):1199-1211 [PMID: 37057640]
  6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):25 [PMID: 29514597]
  7. Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):11-23 [PMID: 31800322]
  8. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Mar;32(3):543-545 [PMID: 31124058]
  9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94 [PMID: 21195583]
  10. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:144-53 [PMID: 26426514]
  11. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Sep;64(5):101492 [PMID: 33454398]
  12. Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 May 17;4(2): [PMID: 31108836]
  13. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Nov;32(11):2187-2200 [PMID: 31520334]
  14. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Oct;45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S165-S179 [PMID: 33054335]
  15. Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 05;9:751289 [PMID: 34805074]
  16. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(3):331-336 [PMID: 32478581]
  17. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Oct 23;9:1803-13 [PMID: 25364238]
  18. Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):257-269 [PMID: 37684502]
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 14;8:CD012327 [PMID: 30103263]
  20. PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196838 [PMID: 29723252]
  21. J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1228-1244 [PMID: 34935178]
  22. Games Health J. 2022 Feb;11(1):1-17 [PMID: 34851732]
  23. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):551.e17-551.e35 [PMID: 28549705]
  24. Physiol Behav. 2022 Oct 1;254:113888 [PMID: 35728627]
  25. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jan;104:104838 [PMID: 36272227]
  26. Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 15;11:881 [PMID: 33041836]
  27. Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 17;9(1):56 [PMID: 32183892]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 08;18(24): [PMID: 34948547]
  29. Maturitas. 2020 Feb;132:40-48 [PMID: 31883662]
  30. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Apr;28(4):1364-7 [PMID: 27190484]
  31. Innov Aging. 2022 Dec 22;7(1):igac077 [PMID: 36846304]
  32. BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008 [PMID: 28935701]
  33. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81 [PMID: 7154893]
  34. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 06;9:812570 [PMID: 35602499]
  35. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1695-1699 [PMID: 28932015]
  36. Biol Res Nurs. 2023 Jan;25(1):88-106 [PMID: 35968662]
  37. Front Netw Physiol. 2021 Jul 07;1:712430 [PMID: 36925570]
  38. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:156 [PMID: 25399408]
  39. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015 Nov;23 Suppl:S14-8 [PMID: 26849537]
  40. J Physiother. 2013 Jun;59(2):93-9 [PMID: 23663794]
  41. Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 18;9(1):163 [PMID: 32682439]
  42. Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 05;13:903673 [PMID: 35989930]
  43. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Aug;33(8):2019-2052 [PMID: 31343601]
  44. Front Public Health. 2022 May 31;10:901763 [PMID: 35712287]
  45. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):939-42 [PMID: 25931764]
  46. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e015888 [PMID: 29122784]
  47. Phys Ther. 2021 Sep 1;101(9): [PMID: 34160022]
  48. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 04;19(7): [PMID: 35410000]
  49. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(2):601-611 [PMID: 29226867]
  50. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 May;31(5):559-566 [PMID: 34027869]
  51. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 21;17(6):e0270132 [PMID: 35727792]
  52. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Dec 2;39(12):2553-2568 [PMID: 35652939]
  53. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Jun;22(6):867-876 [PMID: 33944698]
  54. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Apr 1;27(2):265-275 [PMID: 29989461]
  55. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462 [PMID: 33239350]
  56. J Aging Res. 2017;2017:4653635 [PMID: 28261500]
  57. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 9;11(3):e043807 [PMID: 33687953]
  58. Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):370-379 [PMID: 33068106]
  59. Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jan;32(1):159-63 [PMID: 20697896]
  60. Gerontologist. 2013 Apr;53(2):255-67 [PMID: 22613940]
  61. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Oct 3;39(10):2189-2195 [PMID: 35471847]
  62. Sports Med Open. 2023 Jan 15;9(1):5 [PMID: 36641767]
  63. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2096-102 [PMID: 26360975]
  64. J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):43-61 [PMID: 34289511]
  65. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 24;18(1):164 [PMID: 34819097]
  66. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e21228 [PMID: 32664177]
  67. BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):101-5 [PMID: 11451790]
  68. J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 01;20(1):133-141 [PMID: 33707996]
  69. Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1721-38 [PMID: 26325622]
  70. Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Dec 26;10(1):72-81 [PMID: 36860706]
  71. Int J Biostat. 2023 Mar 27;: [PMID: 36961993]
  72. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Apr/Jun;41(2):108-123 [PMID: 26974212]
  73. Games Health J. 2015 Jun;4(3):161-7 [PMID: 26182059]
  74. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Aug;31(8):1592-1611 [PMID: 33797115]
  75. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 19;100(46):e27195 [PMID: 34797271]
  76. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017 Nov;28(4):727-737 [PMID: 29031339]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Humans
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Exercise
Muscle Strength
Physical Functional Performance
Postural Balance
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Video Games
Meta-Analysis as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.095%systematicreviewsactiveexergamesqualitytestsstrengthSMD���=���0���=���0usinggroupsmeta-analysescomparedactive/passivecontrolphysicalperformanceolderreportedbalanceBBSTUG6-minwalkmusclekneeextension30-schairstanddifferencesCI���=���0HoweversignificantCI���=���-0meta-analysisoverviewassessedoutcomespeoplemethodological2PROSPEROCRD42023391694testlowerhandgripfavor44=���95%availablebodypublishedpeer-reviewedrelatedeffectscertaintyevidencePRISMAAMSTARGRADEprotocolregisteredcode:mainindicate4477recordsfive10includedAMSTAR-2sixhighfourmoderatetwolowthreevery-lowMeta-analysisperformedBergBalanceScaleTimedUp-and-GocardiorespiratoryfitnessupperlimbsSignificantconcerning8512-158=���96%02SMD���=���171-216=���97%���<���000017933-125=���88%0008936450246704138=���84%062005012impossibleperformvariableswalkingspeedfallriskduediversityinstrumentssmallnumberconclusioninterventionsutilizingshownimprovementsstaticdynamiclimbapparentlyhealthyactive/inactiveparticipantsmeasuredfoundHGSSystematicreviewregistration:Effectspeople:agedexergamingdynamometerfunctionalposturalvirtualreality

Similar Articles

Cited By