Toddlers Prefer Agents Who Help Those Facing Harder Tasks.

Brandon M Woo, Shari Liu, Hyowon Gweon, Elizabeth S Spelke
Author Information
  1. Brandon M Woo: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. ORCID
  2. Shari Liu: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Hyowon Gweon: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  4. Elizabeth S Spelke: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Abstract

Capacities to understand and evaluate others' actions are fundamental to human social life. Infants and toddlers are sensitive to the costs of others' actions, infer others' values from the costs of the actions they take, and prefer those who help others to those who hinder them, but it is largely unknown whether and how cost considerations inform early understanding of third-party prosocial actions. In three experiments ( = 94), we asked whether 16-month-old toddlers value agents who selectively help those who need it most. Presented with two agents who attempted two tasks, toddlers preferentially looked to and touched someone who helped the agent in greater need, both when one agent's task required more effort and when the tasks were the same but one agent was weaker. These results provide evidence that toddlers engage in need-based evaluations of helping, applying their understanding of action utilities to their social evaluations.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):923-9 [PMID: 20977563]
  2. Cogn Dev. 2011 Jan;26(1):30-39 [PMID: 21499550]
  3. Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):121-5 [PMID: 17181709]
  4. J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Aug;220:105429 [PMID: 35421629]
  5. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:96-106 [PMID: 29605655]
  6. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):142-9 [PMID: 19120422]
  7. Cogn Psychol. 2020 Dec;123:101334 [PMID: 32738590]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 12;110(46):18728-33 [PMID: 24167247]
  9. Infant Behav Dev. 2023 Feb;70:101797 [PMID: 36481727]
  10. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104823 [PMID: 32151858]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):633-40 [PMID: 25870405]
  12. Nature. 2007 Nov 22;450(7169):557-9 [PMID: 18033298]
  13. R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):191795 [PMID: 32431876]
  14. Psychol Res. 2020 Jul;84(5):1440-1450 [PMID: 30758652]
  15. Cognition. 1998 Jul 15;67(3):311-51 [PMID: 9775513]
  16. Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:116 [PMID: 30837906]
  17. Child Dev. 2023 May;94(3):734-751 [PMID: 36752158]
  18. Dev Sci. 2023 Mar;26(2):e13314 [PMID: 35998080]
  19. Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105533 [PMID: 37390606]
  20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jul;7(7):287-292 [PMID: 12860186]
  21. Dev Sci. 2023 Jan;26(1):e13257 [PMID: 35301779]
  22. Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:154-163 [PMID: 28688284]
  23. Cognition. 1998 Nov;69(1):1-34 [PMID: 9871370]
  24. Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 18;5:614 [PMID: 24994991]
  25. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):70-6 [PMID: 16406326]
  26. Cognition. 1995 Aug;56(2):165-93 [PMID: 7554793]
  27. Cognition. 2017 Mar;160:35-42 [PMID: 28040551]
  28. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;17(5):1215-1233 [PMID: 35549492]
  29. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):589-604 [PMID: 27388875]
  30. Science. 2017 Nov 24;358(6366):1038-1041 [PMID: 29170232]
  31. Dev Sci. 2013 Mar;16(2):209-226 [PMID: 23432831]
  32. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23223 [PMID: 22003380]
  33. Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):196-204 [PMID: 22258431]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19931-6 [PMID: 22123953]
  35. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):144-152 [PMID: 31611659]
  36. Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):589-94 [PMID: 23459869]
  37. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:596213 [PMID: 33192941]
  38. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul-Aug;14(4):e1643 [PMID: 36658758]
  39. Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):487-94 [PMID: 18576956]
  40. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0140570 [PMID: 26565412]
  41. Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 8;29(13):2183-2189.e5 [PMID: 31231049]
  42. Cognition. 1994 Feb;51(2):107-29 [PMID: 8168356]
  43. Dev Psychol. 2018 Aug;54(8):1445-1455 [PMID: 30010354]
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17747-17752 [PMID: 31431537]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0actionstoddlersothers'socialunderstandingcostshelpwhetheragentsneedtwotasksagentoneevaluationshelpingactionCapacitiesunderstandevaluatefundamentalhumanlifeInfantssensitiveinfervaluestakepreferothershinderlargelyunknowncostconsiderationsinformearlythird-partyprosocialthreeexperiments=94asked16-month-oldvalueselectivelyPresentedattemptedpreferentiallylookedtouchedsomeonehelpedgreateragent'staskrequiredeffortweakerresultsprovideevidenceengageneed-basedapplyingutilitiesToddlersPreferAgentsHelpFacingHarderTaskscognitivedevelopmentcognitiontoddlerhood

Similar Articles

Cited By