Impacts of Supplementation with Silymarin on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Shooka Mohammadi, Omid Asbaghi, Reza Afrisham, Vida Farrokhi, Yasaman Jadidi, Fatemeh Mofidi, Damoon Ashtary-Larky
Author Information
  1. Shooka Mohammadi: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia. ORCID
  2. Omid Asbaghi: Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran.
  3. Reza Afrisham: Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14176-13151, Iran. ORCID
  4. Vida Farrokhi: Department of Hematology, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
  5. Yasaman Jadidi: Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14176-13151, Iran.
  6. Fatemeh Mofidi: Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran.
  7. Damoon Ashtary-Larky: Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz 6135715794, Iran. ORCID

Abstract

It has been suggested that Silymarin (SIL) supplementation has positive effects on cardiovascular health and reduces the risk of cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS). This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis assessed the impacts of SIL administration on cardiovascular risk factors. A systematic search of multiple databases was performed to identify eligible controlled trials published up to January 2023. The analysis used a random-effects model and included 33 trials with 1943 participants. It was revealed that SIL supplementation led to a notable reduction in serum levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG) (weighted mean difference (WMD): -21.68 mg/dL, 95% CI: -31.37, -11.99; < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD: -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.25, -0.26; = 0.013), total cholesterol (TC) (WMD: -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI: -23.09, -4.85; = 0.003), triglycerides (TG) (WMD: -26.22 mg/dL, 95% CI: -40.32, -12.12; < 0.001), fasting insulin (WMD: -3.76 mU/mL, 95% CI: -4.80, -2.72; < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (WMD: -17.13 mg/dL, 95% CI: -25.63, -8.63; < 0.001), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (WMD: -0.85%, 95% CI: -1.27, -0.43; < 0.001) in the SIL-treated groups compared to their untreated counterparts. In addition, there were no substantial differences in body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), C-reactive protein (CRP), body weight, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) between the two groups. These outcomes suggest that SIL consumption reduces certain CMS risk factors and has favorable impacts on lipid and glycemic profiles with potential hypotensive effects. These findings should be supported by additional trials with larger sample sizes and longer durations.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Aug;12(2):1135-1140 [PMID: 27446333]
  2. Physiol Res. 2015;64(Suppl 4):S507-12 [PMID: 26681080]
  3. Physiol Res. 2021 Mar 17;70(1):33-43 [PMID: 33453720]
  4. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;142:112024 [PMID: 34399200]
  5. Pharmacol Res. 2004 Aug;50(2):123-30 [PMID: 15177299]
  6. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Mar 5;31(4): [PMID: 32134732]
  7. J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Oct;98(13):4816-4823 [PMID: 29736939]
  8. J Nutr. 2000 Jan;130(1):53-6 [PMID: 10613766]
  9. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 [PMID: 3802833]
  10. Phytomedicine. 2014 Feb 15;21(3):233-9 [PMID: 24176839]
  11. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 21;41(24):2313-2330 [PMID: 32052833]
  12. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 23;12(1):15872 [PMID: 36151457]
  13. Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1279-1301 [PMID: 32065376]
  14. Phytother Res. 2006 Dec;20(12):1036-9 [PMID: 17072885]
  15. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Mar 15;727:15-28 [PMID: 24486395]
  16. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2007 Winter;12(4):179-87 [PMID: 18651002]
  17. Phytother Res. 2019 Jun;33(6):1627-1638 [PMID: 31069872]
  18. Clin Dermatol. 2018 Jan - Feb;36(1):14-20 [PMID: 29241747]
  19. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011 Feb 1;14(3):353-66 [PMID: 20578796]
  20. Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292 [PMID: 31865786]
  21. Phytother Res. 2018 Oct;32(10):1933-1949 [PMID: 30015401]
  22. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 [PMID: 18436948]
  23. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Dec;60(6):896-903 [PMID: 22770926]
  24. Molecules. 2020 May 22;25(10): [PMID: 32455869]
  25. Atherosclerosis. 2020 Oct;311:116-123 [PMID: 32861515]
  26. Phytomedicine. 2018 May 15;44:39-44 [PMID: 29895491]
  27. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2023 Feb;129(1):76-81 [PMID: 32749890]
  28. Int J Pharm. 2019 Dec 15;572:118838 [PMID: 31715362]
  29. Br J Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;174(11):1177-1194 [PMID: 28500635]
  30. Complement Ther Med. 2018 Dec;41:311-319 [PMID: 30477860]
  31. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;31(5):613-617 [PMID: 30920975]
  32. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Sep 28;7:345 [PMID: 27733832]
  33. J Hepatol. 1997 Apr;26(4):871-9 [PMID: 9126802]
  34. Life Sci. 2004 Sep 17;75(18):2167-80 [PMID: 15325843]
  35. Antioxidants (Basel). 2015 Mar 20;4(1):204-47 [PMID: 26785346]
  36. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;15(5): [PMID: 35631363]
  37. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1998 Feb;119(2):125-9 [PMID: 9669080]
  38. Forsch Komplementmed. 2008 Feb;15(1):9-20 [PMID: 18334810]
  39. Phytother Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):868-72 [PMID: 24123505]
  40. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2022 Dec;163:106666 [PMID: 35914666]
  41. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Oct;10(10):1156-1165 [PMID: 34242497]
  42. Phytother Res. 2017 Mar;31(3):366-374 [PMID: 28124457]
  43. Phytother Res. 2021 Dec;35(12):6735-6753 [PMID: 34448254]
  44. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023 Aug;17(8):102824 [PMID: 37523928]
  45. Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111 [PMID: 26061376]
  46. Phytomedicine. 2015 Feb 15;22(2):290-6 [PMID: 25765835]
  47. Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 27;16(11):1972-1988 [PMID: 32398964]
  48. Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Nov 19;5:167-74 [PMID: 24277991]
  49. Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Mar;177(6):1227-1240 [PMID: 31799702]
  50. J Med Food. 2007 Sep;10(3):543-7 [PMID: 17887949]
  51. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  52. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:5147468 [PMID: 27340676]
  53. Molecules. 2017 Jan 24;22(2): [PMID: 28125040]
  54. Xenobiotica. 2007 Jul;37(7):725-35 [PMID: 17620219]
  55. Metabol Open. 2022 May 21;14:100190 [PMID: 35651885]
  56. Arch Pharm Res. 2007 Jan;30(1):82-9 [PMID: 17328246]
  57. J Food Biochem. 2020 Dec;44(12):e13522 [PMID: 33047319]
  58. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  59. Phytother Res. 2022 Feb;36(2):842-856 [PMID: 35016260]
  60. Iran J Pharm Res. 2016 Summer;15(3):493-500 [PMID: 27980584]
  61. Phytother Res. 2022 Oct;36(10):3924-3931 [PMID: 35859298]
  62. J Evid Based Integr Med. 2022 Jan-Dec;27:2515690X211068826 [PMID: 35018864]
  63. JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):74-86 [PMID: 24231879]
  64. Phytother Res. 2024 Mar 12;: [PMID: 38475999]
  65. Phytother Res. 2019 Apr;33(4):871-880 [PMID: 30834633]
  66. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Jun;102:689-698 [PMID: 29604588]
  67. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1940-1949.e8 [PMID: 28419855]
  68. Clin Ther. 2017 Jun;39(6):1244-1264 [PMID: 28526416]
  69. Xenobiotica. 2015;45(9):751-6 [PMID: 26068528]
  70. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22249 [PMID: 33019400]
  71. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46(3):1006-13 [PMID: 18054420]
  72. Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906 [PMID: 33789826]
  73. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;23(3):359-65 [PMID: 19453758]
  74. Phytother Res. 2016 May;30(5):691-700 [PMID: 26887532]
  75. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;929:25-44 [PMID: 27771919]
  76. Biofactors. 2020 Nov;46(6):906-926 [PMID: 33053603]
  77. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5995-9 [PMID: 20231449]
  78. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.095%CI:0WMD:<001SILbloodmg/dLriskCMStrialspressure-0silymarinsupplementationeffectscardiovascularreducescardiometabolicsyndromesystematicimpactsfactorsfasting-125-2=-4lipoprotein63groupsbodylipidglycemicsuggestedpositivehealthreviewdose-responsemeta-analysisassessedadministrationsearchmultipledatabasesperformedidentifyeligiblecontrolledpublishedJanuary2023analysisusedrandom-effectsmodelincluded331943participantsrevealedlednotablereductionserumlevelsglucoseFBGweightedmeandifferenceWMD:-2168-3137-1199diastolicDBPmmHg26013totalcholesterolTC-1397-230985003triglyceridesTG-2622-4032-1212insulin-376mU/mL8072low-densityLDL-1713-25-8hemoglobinA1CHbA1c85%2743SIL-treatedcompareduntreatedcounterpartsadditionsubstantialdifferencesmassindexBMIsystolicSBPC-reactiveproteinCRPweighthigh-densityHDLtwooutcomessuggestconsumptioncertainfavorableprofilespotentialhypotensivefindingssupportedadditionallargersamplesizeslongerdurationsImpactsSupplementationSilymarinCardiovascularRiskFactors:SystematicReviewDose-ResponseMeta-AnalysisBPparametersprofile

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)