Antibiofilm Agents for the Treatment and Prevention of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Michael Gao, Jim Manos, Greg Whiteley, Iryna Zablotska-Manos
Author Information
  1. Michael Gao: Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia. ORCID
  2. Jim Manos: Infection Immunity and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
  3. Greg Whiteley: Infection Immunity and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
  4. Iryna Zablotska-Manos: Sydney Institute of Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW Australia. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is difficult to eradicate due to BV biofilms protecting BV bacteria (Gardnerella, Prevotella, and other genera). With the growing understanding of biofilms, we systematically reviewed the current knowledge on the efficacy of anti-BV biofilm agents.
METHODS: We searched literature in the Scopus, Medline, and Embase databases for empirical studies investigating substances for the treatment of BV biofilms or prevention of their recurrence and their efficacy and/or safety.
RESULTS: Of 201 unique titles, 35 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Most studies (89%) reported on preclinical laboratory research on the efficacy of experimental antibiofilm agents (80%) rather than their safety. Over 50% were published within the past 5 years. Agents were classified into 7 groups: antibiotics, antiseptics, cationic peptides, enzymes, plant extracts, probiotics, and surfactants/surfactant components. Enzymes and probiotics were most commonly investigated. Earlier reports of antibiotics having anti-BV biofilm activity have not been confirmed. Some compounds from other classes demonstrated promising anti-BV biofilm efficacy in early studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research is anticipated on successful antibiofilm agents. If confirmed as effective and safe in human clinical trials, they may offer a breakthrough in BV treatment. With rising antibiotic resistance, antibiofilm agents will significantly improve the current standard of care for BV management.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;32(1):38-42 [PMID: 30507674]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 15;68(5):803-809 [PMID: 30184181]
  3. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022 Apr 19;8(1):29 [PMID: 35440653]
  4. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 May 04;12:824860 [PMID: 35601098]
  5. Arch Microbiol. 2022 May 11;204(6):315 [PMID: 35546374]
  6. Pathog Dis. 2015 Jul;73(5): [PMID: 25838136]
  7. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 29;15:292 [PMID: 26219949]
  8. J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 1;210(3):338-43 [PMID: 24511102]
  9. Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 24;8(9): [PMID: 32847138]
  10. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011 Feb;61(1):41-6 [PMID: 20955467]
  11. Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Jul;16(7):1423-1437 [PMID: 37042412]
  12. Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Nov;36(11):732-4 [PMID: 19704395]
  13. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Aug;22(12):1593-1600 [PMID: 33750246]
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jun;42(6):1428-32 [PMID: 9624489]
  15. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul 2;2018:1426109 [PMID: 30057443]
  16. Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(11):675-81 [PMID: 21175040]
  17. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):405-10 [PMID: 8355942]
  18. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jan 18;11:672429 [PMID: 35118003]
  19. Int Microbiol. 2016 Jun;19(2):101-107 [PMID: 27845497]
  20. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 May 17;66(5):e0231921 [PMID: 35416708]
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12): [PMID: 28893789]
  22. J Hosp Infect. 2016 Jul;93(3):263-70 [PMID: 27140421]
  23. J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e33-e41 [PMID: 30391488]
  24. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Jul 28;77(8):2183-2190 [PMID: 35578895]
  25. Curr Microbiol. 2022 Feb 7;79(3):84 [PMID: 35128579]
  26. Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 31;9(4): [PMID: 33807455]
  27. Pathogens. 2021 Jan 08;10(1): [PMID: 33435575]
  28. Biofilm. 2022 Dec 29;5:100101 [PMID: 36655001]
  29. Int J Pharm. 2020 Sep 25;587:119659 [PMID: 32687973]
  30. Microbiome. 2017 Sep 13;5(1):119 [PMID: 28903767]
  31. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023 Sep 5;47(5): [PMID: 37656883]
  32. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Nov;50(9):102174 [PMID: 34087449]
  33. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4539-51 [PMID: 27161630]
  34. Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Oct 1;48(10):761-765 [PMID: 34110746]
  35. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 1;32(4):507-515 [PMID: 36911333]
  36. Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 03;9(9): [PMID: 34576767]
  37. J Infect Dis. 2013 May 15;207(10):1491-7 [PMID: 23431033]
  38. Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 23;13:806654 [PMID: 35444633]
  39. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;10(10): [PMID: 34680757]
  40. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Aug 11;10:354 [PMID: 32850469]
  41. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(3 cz 1):460-464 [PMID: 33813450]
  42. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 15;10(6): [PMID: 34203908]
  43. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 19;11:568178 [PMID: 33680986]
  44. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Dec;67(12):2870-2 [PMID: 22855857]
  45. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022 May 2;8(1):34 [PMID: 35501321]
  46. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 13;74(Suppl_2):S144-S151 [PMID: 35416968]
  47. Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1033040 [PMID: 36619994]
  48. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011 Aug 1;86(1):58-64 [PMID: 21497071]
  49. Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 29;13:895537 [PMID: 35572634]
  50. J Hosp Infect. 2015 Sep;91(1):35-44 [PMID: 26187533]
  51. Microb Pathog. 2019 Feb;127:21-30 [PMID: 30502515]
  52. Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1318-22 [PMID: 10334980]
  53. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 22;11(5): [PMID: 35625202]
  54. Pathogens. 2021 Feb 25;10(3): [PMID: 33668706]
  55. Future Microbiol. 2017 Apr;12:407-416 [PMID: 28339292]
  56. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jan;12(1):147-79 [PMID: 9880479]
  57. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Aug;58(2):106372 [PMID: 34116184]
  58. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020 Jun 16;2020:1361825 [PMID: 32612729]
  59. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):97.e1-6 [PMID: 18005928]
  60. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154086 [PMID: 27111438]
  61. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022 Apr;9(10):e2104341 [PMID: 35122408]
  62. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 Apr 1;55(2):138-42 [PMID: 17234391]
  63. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):605-9 [PMID: 25245669]
  64. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:284762 [PMID: 23024575]
  65. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Dec;46(12):810-812 [PMID: 31663976]
  66. Pathog Dis. 2019 Nov 1;77(8): [PMID: 31603505]

MeSH Term

Biofilms
Vaginosis, Bacterial
Humans
Female
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Probiotics

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BVefficacybiofilmagentsbiofilmsanti-BVstudiestreatmentantibiofilmBacterialvaginosiscurrentpreventionrecurrencesafetyresearchAgentsantibioticsprobioticsconfirmedBACKGROUND:difficulteradicatedueprotectingbacteriaGardnerellaPrevotellageneragrowingunderstandingsystematicallyreviewedknowledgeMETHODS:searchedliteratureScopusMedlineEmbasedatabasesempiricalinvestigatingsubstancesand/orRESULTS:201uniquetitles35satisfiedinclusioncriteria89%reportedpreclinicallaboratoryexperimental80%rather50%publishedwithinpast5yearsclassified7groups:antisepticscationicpeptidesenzymesplantextractssurfactants/surfactantcomponentsEnzymescommonlyinvestigatedEarlierreportsactivitycompoundsclassesdemonstratedpromisingearlyCONCLUSIONS:anticipatedsuccessfuleffectivesafehumanclinicaltrialsmayofferbreakthroughrisingantibioticresistancewillsignificantlyimprovestandardcaremanagementAntibiofilmTreatmentPreventionVaginosis:SystematicNarrativeReviewbacterial

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)