Food insecurity and academic performance in Spanish adolescents: Results from the EHDLA study.

Edina Maria de Camargo, Sitong Chen, Estela Jiménez-López, Desirée Victoria-Montesinos, Lee Smith, José Francisco López-Gil
Author Information
  1. Edina Maria de Camargo: Department of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 81531-980, Paraná, Brazil.
  2. Sitong Chen: Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
  3. Estela Jiménez-López: Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), 16071 Cuenca, Spain.
  4. Desirée Victoria-Montesinos: Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
  5. Lee Smith: Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
  6. José Francisco López-Gil: One Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.

Abstract

Introduction: Food insecurity is a growing global issue that affects both developed and developing nations, and mounting evidence suggests that decreased consumption of healthy foods has been linked to lower academic performance in adolescents. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between food insecurity and academic performance in a sample of Spanish adolescents aged 12-17 years from the (Region of Murcia, Spain).
Methods: The present study analyzed data from the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities study, which included a sample of 777 adolescents (55.3 % girls). The Spanish Child Food Security Survey Module was used to assess food insecurity, and academic performance was evaluated using school records provided by the schools. Linear regression models (fitted by robust methods) were used to compare the relationships between food insecurity status and academic performance-related indicators.
Results: Adolescents with the highest levels of food insecurity reported the lowest academic performance in language (mean [] = 4.7; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.6 to 5.7), math ( = 4.6; 95 % CI 3.5 to 5.8), foreign language ( = 4.8; 95 % CI 3.8 to 5.8), and grade point average ( = 5.7; 95 % CI 4.9 to 6.5). Conversely, adolescents with the lowest levels of food insecurity reported the highest academic performance in language ( = 6.2; 95 % CI 6.0 to 6.5), math ( = 5.9; 95 % CI 5.5 to 6.2), foreign language ( = 6.2; 95 % CI 5.9 to 6.4), and grade point average ( = 6.7; 95 % CI 6.5 to 6.9) compared to those with higher food security.
Conclusions: Living in a more food-insecure household could explain the lower academic performance of adolescents. Food insecurity should always be on the agenda of public policies. The availability of quality basic food essentials must be ensured in permanently satisfactory quantities without compromising access to other fundamental needs.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e105017 [PMID: 25153531]
  2. J Nutr. 2011 Jun;141(6):1114-9 [PMID: 21525257]
  3. Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4): [PMID: 31501236]
  4. J Nutr. 2004 Oct;134(10):2566-72 [PMID: 15465749]
  5. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(31):8728-8743 [PMID: 34047662]
  6. Nutr Hosp. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):242-52 [PMID: 18560701]
  7. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Feb;62(1):289-298 [PMID: 35972530]
  8. Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 07;9(3): [PMID: 35327742]
  9. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43909 [PMID: 22970149]
  10. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(15):2753-2761 [PMID: 29996952]
  11. J Nutr. 2005 Dec;135(12):2831-9 [PMID: 16317128]
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Aug;68(2 Suppl):470S-475S [PMID: 9701162]
  13. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Nov;160(11):1108-13 [PMID: 17088512]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 04;17(3): [PMID: 32033054]
  15. BMC Public Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):660 [PMID: 31142305]
  16. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Aug;54(9):871-7 [PMID: 25480321]
  17. Nutrients. 2017 Aug 30;9(9): [PMID: 28867798]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 30;15:441 [PMID: 25924925]
  19. Health Educ Res. 2007 Feb;22(1):70-80 [PMID: 16766605]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 21;16(10): [PMID: 31117216]
  21. Nutr J. 2013 Dec 17;12:162 [PMID: 24344995]
  22. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Feb/Mar;38(2):135-150 [PMID: 28134627]
  23. J Sch Health. 2008 Apr;78(4):209-15; quiz 239-41 [PMID: 18336680]
  24. Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 03;9:797415 [PMID: 35187033]
  25. Nat Food. 2022;3(8):555-556 [PMID: 35965676]
  26. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Aug;12(8):1133-40 [PMID: 18789167]
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Apr;24(6):1349-1361 [PMID: 32713415]
  28. J Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;149(10):1812-1817 [PMID: 31240308]
  29. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):109-117.e1 [PMID: 28870608]
  30. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;30(2):117-140 [PMID: 27599886]
  31. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(14):2615-2625 [PMID: 32456742]
  32. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):448 [PMID: 32917172]
  33. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Nov;76(4):425-426 [PMID: 28707609]
  34. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Oct;122(10S):S55-S66 [PMID: 36122960]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;21(1):1397 [PMID: 34266406]
  36. Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):40 [PMID: 33472636]
  37. Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Dec;11(4):600-617 [PMID: 36083573]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1429-36 [PMID: 18179852]
  39. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e3096 [PMID: 27015180]
  40. J Sch Health. 2023 Oct;93(10):883-890 [PMID: 37357352]
  41. Ecol Food Nutr. 2021 Sep-Oct;60(5):564-579 [PMID: 34617865]
  42. Nutrients. 2016 Dec 10;8(12): [PMID: 27973419]
  43. J Sports Sci. 2021 Apr;39(7):801-807 [PMID: 33213295]
  44. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1293-303 [PMID: 23200286]
  45. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):568-78 [PMID: 18568016]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.05academic6insecurity95 %performancefoodCIadolescentsFoodstudylanguage789Spanish3 = 62lowerpresentsampleusedstatushighestlevelsreportedlowestmath = 4foreigngradepointaverage = 54Introduction:growingglobalissueaffectsdevelopeddevelopingnationsmountingevidencesuggestsdecreasedconsumptionhealthyfoodslinkedaimedexaminerelationshipaged12-17yearsRegionMurciaSpainMethods:analyzeddataEatingHealthyDailyLifeActivitiesincluded777553 %girlsChildSecuritySurveyModuleassessevaluatedusingschoolrecordsprovidedschoolsLinearregressionmodelsfittedrobustmethodscomparerelationshipsperformance-relatedindicatorsResults:Adolescentsmean[] = 4confidenceinterval[CI]Conversely0comparedhighersecurityConclusions:Livingfood-insecurehouseholdexplainalwaysagendapublicpoliciesavailabilityqualitybasicessentialsmustensuredpermanentlysatisfactoryquantitieswithoutcompromisingaccessfundamentalneedsadolescents:ResultsEHDLAAdolescenceachievementhungersocioeconomicundernourishment

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)