National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Trisha L Amboree, Jane R Montealegre, Susan L Parker, Ashvita Garg, Haluk Damgacioglu, Kathleen M Schmeler, Elizabeth Y Chiao, Elizabeth G Hill, Kalyani Sonawane, Ashish A Deshmukh, Prajakta Adsul
Author Information
  1. Trisha L Amboree: Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  2. Jane R Montealegre: Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  3. Susan L Parker: Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  4. Ashvita Garg: Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
  5. Haluk Damgacioglu: Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
  6. Kathleen M Schmeler: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  7. Elizabeth Y Chiao: Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  8. Elizabeth G Hill: Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
  9. Kalyani Sonawane: Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
  10. Ashish A Deshmukh: Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
  11. Prajakta Adsul: Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Abstract

Importance: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) deliver health care to nearly 30 million underserved persons across the US, yet nationwide and state-level breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening use in FQHCs is not described. Furthermore, it is unknown how the underscreened FQHC population contributes to the total underscreened population at national and state levels.
Objective: To describe national- and state-level breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening use among individuals served by FQHCs in the US and to estimate the percentage of underscreened individuals in the general population served by FQHCs.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of cancer screening used data from January 1 through December 31, 2020, from the FQHC Uniform Data System, reported by 1364 FQHCs across the US, and self-reported estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Participants were 16 696 692 US adults served by FQHCs who were eligible for breast (age, 50-74 years), cervical (age, 21-64 years), and colorectal (age, 50-75 years) cancer screening. Analyses were conducted between January 1 and June 30, 2023.
Exposures: Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening-eligible individuals up to date on screening.
Results: A total of 3���162���882 breast, 7���444���465 cervical, and 6���089���345 colorectal screening-eligible individuals were served by FQHCs in 2020. Nationally, screening use in FQHCs was 45.4% (95% CI, 45.4%-45.5%) for breast cancer, 51.0% (95% CI, 51.0%-51.1%) for cervical cancer, and 40.2% (95% CI, 40.1%-40.2%) for colorectal cancer. Screening use among the US general population was 78.2% (95% CI, 77.6%-78.9%) for breast cancer, 82.9% (95% CI, 82.3%-83.4%) for cervical cancer, and 72.3% (95% CI, 71.7%-72.8%) for colorectal cancer. The contribution of the underscreened population served by FQHCs to the national underscreened general population was 16.9% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 16.4%-17.4%) for breast cancer, 29.7% (95% UI, 28.8%-30.7%) for cervical cancer, and 14.7% (95% UI, 14.4%-15.0%) for colorectal cancer.
Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this national cross-sectional study indicated major gaps in cancer screening use in FQHCs in the US. Improved prevention is urgently needed to address screening disparities.

References

  1. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):e637-e644 [PMID: 33974834]
  2. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013 Oct;15(5):993-1000 [PMID: 22878911]
  3. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96 [PMID: 26757170]
  4. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar;29(1):30-7 [PMID: 23996232]
  5. JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977 [PMID: 34003218]
  6. JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686 [PMID: 30140884]
  7. Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4203-4209 [PMID: 31479529]
  8. Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):96 [PMID: 33121536]
  9. JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998 [PMID: 34003220]
  10. Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(12):1073-1084 [PMID: 37486400]
  11. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):878-884 [PMID: 33914015]
  12. Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105 Suppl 5:S706-12 [PMID: 26447909]
  13. Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S74-83 [PMID: 18725837]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Middle Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
United States
Cross-Sectional Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Adult
Male
Aged
Mass Screening

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerFQHCscervicalcolorectalscreening95%breastUSpopulationCIuseunderscreenedservedindividualsnationalgeneral16ageyears4%2%9%7%Federallyhealth30acrossstate-levelFQHCtotalamongcross-sectionalJanuary12020SystemBreastscreening-eligible45510%40Screening82UI14Importance:qualifiedcentersdelivercarenearlymillionunderservedpersonsyetnationwidedescribedFurthermoreunknowncontributesstatelevelsObjective:describenational-estimatepercentageDesignSettingParticipants:analysisuseddataDecember31UniformDatareported1364self-reportedestimatesBehavioralRiskFactorSurveillanceParticipants696692adultseligible50-7421-6450-75AnalysesconductedJune2023Exposures:MainOutcomesMeasures:PercentagesdateResults:3���162���8827���444���4656���089���345Nationally4%-455%0%-511%1%-4078776%-783%-83723%717%-728%contributionuncertaintyinterval[UI]4%-1729288%-304%-15ConclusionsRelevance:FindingsstudyindicatedmajorgapsImprovedpreventionurgentlyneededaddressdisparitiesNationalCervicalColorectalCancerUseQualifiedHealthCenters

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)