Double-blind, randomized, 8-week multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of STW 5-II placebo in functional dyspepsia.

Bettina Vinson, Careen Fink, Manfred Wargenau, Nicholas J Talley, Gerald Holtmann
Author Information
  1. Bettina Vinson: Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
  2. Careen Fink: Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
  3. Manfred Wargenau: M.A.R.C.O. GmbH & Co. KG, Institute for Clinical Research and Statistics Düsseldorf Germany.
  4. Nicholas J Talley: School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.
  5. Gerald Holtmann: University of Queensland and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland Australia. ORCID

Abstract

Background and Aim: Herbal products are widely used to treat patients with disorders of gut brain interaction but clinical efficacy and safety data for treatments lasting >4 weeks are widely lacking. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with the herbal combination product STW 5-II for patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) meeting Rome II criteria. We also conducted a post hoc analysis including patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FD and evaluated the effect of the G-protein beta 3 (GNB3) subunit polymorphism (C825T) on therapeutic response.
Methods: This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study included 272 FD patients meeting Rome II criteria in the intention-to-treat cohort and 266 meeting Rome IV criteria. We used the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Score (GIS) to assess GI symptoms, defining response rate as the proportion of patients with ≥50% GIS improvement in at least three of four assessments.
Results: After 8 weeks, the response rate was significantly higher in the STW 5-II group placebo (61.2% 45.1%,  = 0.008). Mean GIS non-significantly improved with STW 5-II treatment (7.9 ± 4.41 6.7 ± 4.91 with placebo;  = 0.07). In the Rome IV subgroup analysis, STW 5-II yielded a better response rate ( = 0.01) placebo and greater postprandial distress symptom improvement ( = 0.04) placebo. Safety parameters did not differ between groups, and GNB3 status was not linked with therapeutic response.
Conclusion: STW 5-II is efficacious, with no observed safety signals at up to 8 weeks of treatment in patients with FD meeting Rome II or IV criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Gut. 2023 May;72(5):929-938 [PMID: 36167662]
  2. BMC Med Genet. 2010 Jan 26;11:13 [PMID: 20102604]
  3. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;112(6):903-909 [PMID: 28291238]
  4. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Feb;15(2):207-16 [PMID: 11148439]
  5. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Feb;13(2):225-35 [PMID: 10102954]
  6. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jan;48:102233 [PMID: 31987249]
  7. Gut. 1999 Sep;45 Suppl 2:II69-77 [PMID: 10457048]
  8. Dig Dis. 2020;38(4):269-279 [PMID: 31770769]
  9. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 May 1;44(2):233-8 [PMID: 15866221]
  10. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Feb;33(2):e14044 [PMID: 33258198]
  11. Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):99-114.e3 [PMID: 32294476]
  12. Dig Dis. 2017;35 Suppl 1:36-42 [PMID: 29421793]
  13. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Feb;33(2):e13984 [PMID: 32936513]
  14. Phytomedicine. 2021 Jul 15;88:153589 [PMID: 34111617]
  15. Gut. 2005 Jul;54(7):914-9 [PMID: 15951533]
  16. Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(6):1469-1480.e1 [PMID: 27147123]
  17. Gut. 2015 Jul;64(7):1049-57 [PMID: 25147201]
  18. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Feb;35(2):e14527 [PMID: 36592054]
  19. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug 15;22(4):357-63 [PMID: 16098003]
  20. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1538-51 [PMID: 16678567]
  21. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Oct 26;7:393 [PMID: 27833553]
  22. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;94(9):2390-7 [PMID: 10483997]
  23. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Nov 03;3:17081 [PMID: 29099093]
  24. Gastroenterology. 2003 May;124(5):1220-9 [PMID: 12730863]
  25. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009 Apr;21(4):467-76 [PMID: 19140959]
  26. Phytomedicine. 2006;13 Suppl 5:56-66 [PMID: 16963243]
  27. Gastroenterology. 2013 Sep;145(3):566-73 [PMID: 23702005]
  28. Gut. 2014 Feb;63(2):262-71 [PMID: 23474421]
  29. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jan;29(1): [PMID: 27430937]
  30. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Nov;25(11):911-e703 [PMID: 23992049]
  31. Phytomedicine. 2006;13 Suppl 5:36-44 [PMID: 16777393]
  32. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Feb 1;19(3):271-9 [PMID: 14984373]
  33. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1175-83 [PMID: 17686660]
  34. Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;40(6):401-8 [PMID: 12055663]
  35. Gastroenterology. 2004 Apr;126(4):971-9 [PMID: 15057736]
  36. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2010 May;3(3):145-64 [PMID: 21180597]
  37. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 7;25(5):552-566 [PMID: 30774271]
  38. Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1689-1702 [PMID: 33049222]
  39. Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(6):1380-92 [PMID: 27147122]
  40. Gut Liver. 2014 May;8(3):271-6 [PMID: 24827623]
  41. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1853-63 [PMID: 26535514]
  42. Digestion. 2004;69(1):45-52 [PMID: 14755152]
  43. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 14;20(2):346-62 [PMID: 24574705]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0STWRomepatients5-IIcriteriasafetymeetingresponseplaceboefficacyFDIV = 08 weekstreatmentfunctionaldyspepsiaIIGISratewidelyusedevaluatedanalysisGNB3therapeuticmulticenterstudyimprovementBackgroundAim:Herbalproductstreatdisordersgutbraininteractionclinicaldatatreatmentslasting>4 weekslackingherbalcombinationproductalsoconductedposthocincludingeffectG-proteinbeta3subunitpolymorphismC825TMethods:placebo-controlleddouble-blindincluded272intention-to-treatcohort266validatedGastrointestinalSymptomScoreassessGIsymptomsdefiningproportion≥50%leastthreefourassessmentsResults:significantlyhighergroup612%451%008Meannon-significantlyimproved79 ± 44167 ± 49107subgroupyieldedbetter01greaterpostprandialdistresssymptom04SafetyparametersdiffergroupsstatuslinkedConclusion:efficaciousobservedsignalsDouble-blindrandomized8-week5‐II

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.