Evaluation of an online arts-based platform to support the health and well-being of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.

Justin Sutherland, Isabella Herrington, Julie Makarski, Jennifer Tindall, Mary Hynes, Monika Kastner
Author Information
  1. Justin Sutherland: Healthcare Management, Humber College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  2. Isabella Herrington: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  3. Julie Makarski: Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  4. Jennifer Tindall: Art Your Service Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  5. Mary Hynes: Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  6. Monika Kastner: Knowledge Translation and Implementation, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. monika.kastner@utoronto.ca.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to conduct a formative evaluation of the Art Your Service (AYS) arts-based program to determine the program's potential for improving the social and physical well-being of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: An online questionnaire was administered to the AYS members who consented to be invited to participate in the study. Questionnaire items consisted of a Likert scale and open-ended questions delivered using an online platform (SurveyMonkey). Participants provided feedback on their perceptions and experiences of the AYS program, such as its impact on their health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic, the benefits and challenges of participating, and any suggestions for program improvement.
OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies, means with standard deviations), and open-ended questions (qualitative data) were analyzed using content analysis. Outcomes included participant demographics, perceptions about the program, usability (System Usability Scale [SUS]), eHealth literacy (eHealth Literacy Scale), and social isolation (Lubben Social Network Scale; LSNS-6).
RESULTS: Program participants revealed consistent patterns of their perceptions and experiences about the program, including a high satisfaction rate (95%) and a perceived positive impact on participants' health and well-being. The program sessions were perceived to be a well-organized, convenient, and safe way to engage with one another socially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The program usability was also perceived to be high (SUS mean score 86.2). Participants felt a sense of connectedness and had reduced feelings of social isolation. Most participants (75%) reported that the program improved their physical health.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this formative evaluation study identified key strengths and opportunities to improve the Art Your Service arts-based program, which can be used to help enhance the program's functioning and long-term sustainability potential.

Keywords

References

  1. Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Apr;33(4):150-6 [PMID: 25783223]
  2. Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 05;11:68 [PMID: 32116898]
  3. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;28(9):983-988 [PMID: 32622730]
  4. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Oct;21(10):1464-1469.e2 [PMID: 32362535]
  5. Age Ageing. 2018 May 01;47(3):392-397 [PMID: 29309502]
  6. Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;12(1): [PMID: 35049612]
  7. Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;9:659263 [PMID: 34336761]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):129 [PMID: 32054474]
  9. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Sep 23;17:16 [PMID: 32983273]
  10. Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):503-13 [PMID: 16921004]
  11. Dementia (London). 2023 Jan;22(1):252-280 [PMID: 36194002]
  12. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27 [PMID: 17213046]
  13. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 [PMID: 18352969]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):525-33 [PMID: 21098340]
  15. Prev Med. 2009 Aug-Sep;49(2-3):142-7 [PMID: 19589351]
  16. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;2014:836748 [PMID: 25544932]
  17. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:906191 [PMID: 36225688]
  18. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(2):587-595 [PMID: 31256123]
  19. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Jan 28;78(1):87-96 [PMID: 36190802]
  20. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2020 Oct;1(1):e9-e10 [PMID: 34173611]
  21. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560 [PMID: 32304649]
  22. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Feb 14;75(3):549-559 [PMID: 30412233]
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [PMID: 15471760]
  24. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2016 Oct 21;6(3):508-517 [PMID: 27920794]
  25. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jul - Aug;83:126-130 [PMID: 31003135]
  26. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jan 05;5:1 [PMID: 30622728]
  27. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316 [PMID: 20668659]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):955 [PMID: 29254485]
  29. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):181 [PMID: 32762745]
  30. Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 08;9:2655 [PMID: 30671000]
  31. Lancet. 2000 Apr 15;355(9212):1315-9 [PMID: 10776744]
  32. BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e013778 [PMID: 28515187]
  33. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(1):88-94 [PMID: 15030445]
  34. J R Soc Med. 2012 Dec;105(12):518-22 [PMID: 23288086]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Male
Female
Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Middle Aged
Program Evaluation
Aged, 80 and over
Pandemics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programCOVID-19well-beinghealthstudyAYSarts-basedsocialadultspandemiconlineusingperceptionsScaleisolationperceivedformativeevaluationArtServiceprogram'spotentialphysicalolderANDopen-endedquestionsplatformParticipantsexperiencesimpactdataanalyzedusabilityeHealthSocialparticipantshighOBJECTIVES:objectiveconductdetermineimprovingDESIGNSETTINGSPARTICIPANTS:questionnaireadministeredmembersconsentedinvitedparticipateQuestionnaireitemsconsistedLikertscaledeliveredSurveyMonkeyprovidedfeedbackbenefitschallengesparticipatingsuggestionsimprovementOUTCOMEMEASURESANALYSIS:QuantitativedescriptivestatisticsfrequenciesmeansstandarddeviationsqualitativecontentanalysisOutcomesincludedparticipantdemographicsSystemUsability[SUS]literacyLiteracyLubbenNetworkLSNS-6RESULTS:Programrevealedconsistentpatternsincludingsatisfactionrate95%positiveparticipants'sessionswell-organizedconvenientsafewayengageoneanothersociallyalsoSUSmeanscore862feltsenseconnectednessreducedfeelings75%reportedimprovedCONCLUSIONS:Findingsidentifiedkeystrengthsopportunitiesimprovecanusedhelpenhancefunctioninglong-termsustainabilityEvaluationsupportpandemic:cross-sectionalsurveyArts-basedinterventionLonelinessOlderSurvey

Similar Articles

Cited By