Patient experiences of information-sharing and patient-centred care across the broad landscape of primary care practice and provision: a nationally representative survey of Australian adults.

Amie Steel, Hope Foley, Kim Graham, Joanna Harnett, Jon Adams
Author Information
  1. Amie Steel: ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia. Amie.steel@uts.edu.au.
  2. Hope Foley: ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
  3. Kim Graham: ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
  4. Joanna Harnett: School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  5. Jon Adams: ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Australian government strategies and frameworks have been developed in recent years to encourage the integration and coordination of primary care delivery; including patient-centred approaches to clinical and preventative care, and health promotion. This study aims to explore patient experiences of information-sharing and patient-centred care across various primary care clinical settings, with a particular focus on clinical encounters with GPs, naturopaths, osteopaths and acupuncturists.
METHODS: Data about healthcare utilisation and experiences from a 63-item cross-sectional survey obtained from a nationally representative sample of Australian adults aged���������18 years were analysed. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to explore differences in the experiences of knowledge and information sharing during GP consultations among those who also consulted with a naturopath, osteopath or acupuncturist, compared those who had not. Logistic regression was used to investigate correlations between participants perceptions about GP consultation outcomes, and the GP's information-sharing behaviour or perceived experience of patient-centredness.
RESULTS: Across 2354 participants, verbal explanation (76.3%) and/or individualised handouts (16.8%) were the most common type of information shared in GP consultations. Individuals who consulted with a GP and a naturopath, an osteopath, or an acupuncturist reported a lower rate of receiving a verbal explanation from their GP but higher rate of receiving other types of information sources including handouts. Over one quarter of study participants who visited a GP did not discuss any of their health information with their GP. Information sharing was lower for individuals who also visited a naturopath, osteopath or acupuncturist. Participants scored their consultations with a GP as patient-centred, but these scores were lower among participants who also consulted with at least one other primary care practitioner type included in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Public health and health services researchers, policymakers and leaders of primary care professions have a role and responsibility to ensure practitioners are confident and competent in sharing health information with their patients that considers their health literacy needs, and the importance of patient-centred care. Research focussed on a more in-depth understanding of the differences and relationships observed across the primary care landscape in this study is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):293 [PMID: 34847899]
  2. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 29;17(12):e288 [PMID: 26715363]
  3. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):12-21 [PMID: 21161465]
  4. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Aug;52:102518 [PMID: 32951761]
  5. J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(6):643-50 [PMID: 17718647]
  6. BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e057293 [PMID: 35613791]
  7. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 7;9(1):1573 [PMID: 30733573]
  8. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):91-103 [PMID: 32562341]
  9. Women Health. 2014;54(2):127-44 [PMID: 24417673]
  10. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3328-e3341 [PMID: 35862510]
  11. Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Nov 22;25:35 [PMID: 29201346]
  12. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 23;14:183 [PMID: 24754890]
  13. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211035742 [PMID: 34399597]
  14. Hum Resour Health. 2021 Mar 29;19(1):42 [PMID: 33781297]
  15. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:102-15 [PMID: 20845197]
  16. J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Apr;18(4):363-70 [PMID: 22515795]
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 02;16(12):e262 [PMID: 25470306]
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Apr;116:103402 [PMID: 31630807]
  19. J Glob Health. 2023 Jul 30;13:04043 [PMID: 37387471]
  20. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;22(4):420-8 [PMID: 19923998]
  21. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):260-277 [PMID: 34528338]
  22. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2009;2:21-33 [PMID: 22312205]
  23. J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2:77-82 [PMID: 26513034]
  24. J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):238-254 [PMID: 33332183]
  25. Med J Aust. 2023 Apr 17;218(7):287 [PMID: 37062008]
  26. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1335-e1342 [PMID: 34396621]
  27. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46(5):316-320 [PMID: 28472578]
  28. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):21-34 [PMID: 16427760]
  29. Health Info Libr J. 2017 Dec;34(4):268-283 [PMID: 29045011]
  30. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Aug;17(8):735-40 [PMID: 21745097]
  31. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 23;8(1):17325 [PMID: 30470778]
  32. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):59 [PMID: 32070338]
  33. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116 [PMID: 31369582]
  34. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Sep;25(17-18):2609-18 [PMID: 27364760]
  35. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11 [PMID: 10396471]
  36. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011 Sep;43(3):255-64 [PMID: 21884371]
  37. J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):181-188 [PMID: 30307741]
  38. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41 [PMID: 12660210]
  39. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Apr 14;5(2):201-205 [PMID: 31406825]

Grants

  1. FT220100610/Australian Research Council

MeSH Term

Humans
Patient-Centered Care
Female
Male
Primary Health Care
Australia
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Middle Aged
Information Dissemination
Aged
Young Adult
Adolescent
Physician-Patient Relations
Patient Satisfaction

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careGPprimaryhealthpatient-centredinformationstudyexperiencesparticipantsAustralianclinicalinformation-sharingacrosssharingconsultationsalsoconsultednaturopathosteopathacupuncturistlowerPatientyearsincludingpromotionexploresurveynationallyrepresentativeadultsuseddifferencesamongverbalexplanationhandoutstyperatereceivingonevisitedlandscapeBACKGROUND:governmentstrategiesframeworksdevelopedrecentencourageintegrationcoordinationdeliveryapproachespreventativeaimspatientvarioussettingsparticularfocusencountersGPsnaturopathsosteopathsacupuncturistsMETHODS:Datahealthcareutilisation63-itemcross-sectionalobtainedsampleaged���������18analysedChi-squareKruskal-WallisHtestsknowledgecomparedLogisticregressioninvestigatecorrelationsperceptionsconsultationoutcomesGP'sbehaviourperceivedexperiencepatient-centrednessRESULTS:Across2354763%and/orindividualised168%commonsharedIndividualsreportedhighertypessourcesquarterdiscussInformationindividualsParticipantsscoredscoresleastpractitionerincludedCONCLUSIONS:PublicservicesresearcherspolicymakersleadersprofessionsroleresponsibilityensurepractitionersconfidentcompetentpatientsconsidersliteracyneedsimportanceResearchfocussedin-depthunderstandingrelationshipsobservedrecommendedbroadpracticeprovision:HealthKnowledgemobilisationeducationexpertPrimaryShareddecision-making

Similar Articles

Cited By