Development and acceptability of a culturally competent skills and knowledge assessment tool for patients with diabetes mellitus.

Stephanie Hakimian, Susan Karam, Kim Pardilla, Kasey Coyne, Emilie K Touma, Diane Larsen, Jane L Holl, Amisha Wallia
Author Information
  1. Stephanie Hakimian: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  2. Susan Karam: Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
  3. Kim Pardilla: University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
  4. Kasey Coyne: Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  5. Emilie K Touma: Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  6. Diane Larsen: NorthShore, Evanston, IL, USA.
  7. Jane L Holl: Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, IL, USA.
  8. Amisha Wallia: Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract

Background: Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and newly prescribed insulin need to learn essential self-care and management skills quickly. To optimize teaching, clinicians need to assess a patient's basic understanding of DM and their skills. While DM patient assessments exist, this study reports the development of an assessment of patient DM management skills and knowledge, using feedback from DM clinicians, patients, and caregivers.
Research Design and Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline and Scopus (1980-2017) of DM knowledge assessments was performed. Twenty-four studies were identified. Content from the existing assessments was adapted to create a 12 item DM-Skills Knowledge Assessment (SKA) to assess a patient's DM management skills and knowledge. To assess cultural humility, modified cognitive interviews were conducted in individual user sessions and semi-structured focus groups. Audio-transcripts of the interviews/focus groups were independently coded, and codes were grouped into key themes. Participant demographic characteristics were assessed.
Results: Five focus groups and eleven key informant interviews were conducted, including 10 DM clinicians, 12 patients/caregivers, and 15 laypersons. All 10 clinicians reported that the DM-SKA addresses the key domains of DM education deemed to be of highest importance during the transition from hospital to home and that their patients would be willing to complete the assessment. More than half of the patient/caregiver/layperson participants self-reported race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white and performed similarly to non-Hispanic white participants in understanding each item, willingness to complete the DM-SKA, and perception that family or community members would be willing to complete the DM-SKA. The DM-SKA has a baseline Flesch reading score of 81.3, indicating low complexity language.
Conclusion: DM clinicians agreed that the DM-SKA assesses all essential DM management skills. For patients/caregivers, it has acceptable literacy, cognitive validity, and culturally acceptable for racial/ethnic minority populations in the study, including elderly persons.

Keywords

References

  1. World J Diabetes. 2014 Jun 15;5(3):296-304 [PMID: 24936251]
  2. BMJ Open Qual. 2018 May 16;7(2):e000224 [PMID: 29862328]
  3. Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):40-53 [PMID: 28118121]
  4. Health Promot Pract. 2014 Mar;15(2):252-62 [PMID: 23362334]
  5. Diabetes Educ. 2019 Apr;45(2):184-193 [PMID: 30803399]
  6. Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):68-76 [PMID: 24163359]
  7. Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):133-46 [PMID: 12693519]
  8. Public Health Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;28(5):444-50 [PMID: 22092429]
  9. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Feb;9(1):60-7 [PMID: 17316099]
  10. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:439-55 [PMID: 15015929]
  11. Diabet Med. 2011 Mar;28(3):306-10 [PMID: 21309839]
  12. Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):743-9 [PMID: 26965718]
  13. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 7;3:2333392816671638 [PMID: 28462283]
  14. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S144-S151 [PMID: 29222385]
  15. Foot (Edinb). 2019 Mar;38:65-69 [PMID: 30665197]
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1308-16 [PMID: 22584728]
  17. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 01;8:96 [PMID: 18452617]
  18. Diabetes Educ. 2016 Apr;42(2):178-87 [PMID: 26769757]
  19. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275-81 [PMID: 20299481]
  20. Prev Med. 2016 Feb;83:31-6 [PMID: 26658025]
  21. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 26;13:1443-1450 [PMID: 31692594]
  22. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):84-88 [PMID: 28707643]
  23. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):505-18 [PMID: 21747287]
  24. Diabetes Spectr. 2017 Nov;30(4):301-314 [PMID: 29151721]
  25. J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Mar;29(2):295-301 [PMID: 25536866]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DMskillscliniciansDM-SKAmanagementknowledgemellitusassessassessmentsassessmentpatientsgroupskeycompletenewlydiabetesneedessentialpatient'sunderstandingpatientstudyperformed12itemcognitiveinterviewsconductedfocusincluding10patients/caregiverswillingparticipantsnon-HispanicwhiteacceptableculturallycompetentBackground:Patientsdiagnosedtype2prescribedinsulinlearnself-carequicklyoptimizeteachingbasicexistreportsdevelopmentusingfeedbackcaregiversResearchDesignMethods:systematicsearchPubmed/MedlineScopus1980-2017Twenty-fourstudiesidentifiedContentexistingadaptedcreateDM-SkillsKnowledgeAssessmentSKAculturalhumilitymodifiedindividualusersessionssemi-structuredAudio-transcriptsinterviews/focusindependentlycodedcodesgroupedthemesParticipantdemographiccharacteristicsassessedResults:Fiveeleveninformant15laypersonsreportedaddressesdomainseducationdeemedhighestimportancetransitionhospitalhomehalfpatient/caregiver/laypersonself-reportedrace/ethnicitysimilarlywillingnessperceptionfamilycommunitymembersbaselineFleschreadingscore813indicatinglowcomplexitylanguageConclusion:agreedassessesliteracyvalidityracial/ethnicminoritypopulationselderlypersonsDevelopmentacceptabilitytoolCulturallyDiabetesEducation

Similar Articles

Cited By