Proportions and determinants of successful surgical repair of obstetric fistula in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liknaw Bewket Zeleke, Alec Welsh, Gedefaw Abeje, Marjan Khejahei
Author Information
  1. Liknaw Bewket Zeleke: College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia. ORCID
  2. Alec Welsh: Faculty of Medicine, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
  3. Gedefaw Abeje: School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
  4. Marjan Khejahei: Faculty of Medicine, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a serious and debilitating problem resulting from tissue necrosis on the reproductive and urinary and/or lower gastrointestinal tract organs due to prolonged labor. Primary studies of the treatment of obstetric fistulae report significantly variable treatment outcomes following surgical repair. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has yet estimated the pooled proportion and identified the determinants of successful obstetric fistula surgical repair.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion and identify the determinants of successful surgical repair of obstetric fistulae in low- and middle-income countries.
METHODS: The protocol was developed and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID CRD42022323630). Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus databases, and gray literature sources were performed. All the accessed studies were selected with Covidence, and the quality of the studies was examined. Finally, the data were extracted using Excel and analyzed with R software.
RESULTS: This review included 79 studies out of 9337 following the screening process. The analysis reveals that 77.85% (95%CI: 75.14%; 80.56%) of surgical repairs in low and middle-income countries are successful. women who attain primary education and above, are married, and have alive neonatal outcomes are more likely to have successful repair outcomes. In contrast, women with female genital mutilation, primiparity, a large fistula size, a fistula classification of II and above, urethral damage, vaginal scarring, a circumferential defect, multiple fistulae, prior repair and postoperative complications are less likely to have successful repair outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The proportion of successful surgical repairs of obstetric fistula in low and middle-income countries remains suboptimal. Hence, stakeholders and policymakers must design and implement policies promoting women's education. In addition, fistula care providers need to reach and manage obstetric fistula cases early before complications, like vaginal fibrosis, occur.

References

  1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99 Suppl 1:S51-6 [PMID: 17765241]
  2. BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647 [PMID: 25555855]
  3. Indian J Public Health. 2020 Oct-Dec;64(4):386-392 [PMID: 33318390]
  4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jul;90(7):753-60 [PMID: 21542810]
  5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1748-52 [PMID: 17132477]
  6. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(4):189-94 [PMID: 9795822]
  7. J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Sep;191(3):259-63 [PMID: 10989900]
  8. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):70-3 [PMID: 26233699]
  9. BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1258-64 [PMID: 19459865]
  10. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Sep;65(9):954-9 [PMID: 26338740]
  11. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;50(4):286-94 [PMID: 15973264]
  12. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002-2003;34(4):489-93 [PMID: 14577490]
  13. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):822-827 [PMID: 29523027]
  14. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Feb;25(2):249-55 [PMID: 23903820]
  15. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1755-1759 [PMID: 32577790]
  16. Rehabil Res Pract. 2022 Feb 08;2022:6703409 [PMID: 35178255]
  17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):668-71 [PMID: 19376492]
  18. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):345-351 [PMID: 28600757]
  19. Adv Urol. 2021 Jan 20;2021:8838146 [PMID: 33531896]
  20. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2473-2482 [PMID: 33416963]
  21. BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1344-53 [PMID: 22900837]
  22. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jan;33(1):30-35 [PMID: 21272433]
  23. Reprod Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(1):61 [PMID: 33691736]
  24. SAGE Open Med. 2023 Jul 21;11:20503121231187742 [PMID: 37492647]
  25. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jun;28(6):941-945 [PMID: 27826639]
  26. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983 Oct;21(5):381-5 [PMID: 6141096]
  27. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0216763 [PMID: 31675379]
  28. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018 Oct-Dec;25(4):213-219 [PMID: 30588941]
  29. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):92 [PMID: 28962566]
  30. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1891-1898 [PMID: 36786855]
  31. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 01;14:45 [PMID: 24690082]
  32. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):293-6 [PMID: 15238105]
  33. J Postgrad Med. 1993 Jan-Mar;39(1):20-1 [PMID: 8295139]
  34. Mil Med Res. 2020 Feb 29;7(1):7 [PMID: 32111253]
  35. Br J Urol. 1979 Jun;51(3):208-10 [PMID: 465988]
  36. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Aug 21;13:164 [PMID: 23965150]
  37. BMC Urol. 2011 Dec 07;11:23 [PMID: 22151960]
  38. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Nov;27(8):819-23 [PMID: 18097903]
  39. BMC Womens Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:73 [PMID: 26359255]
  40. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020 Jun;24(2):129-140 [PMID: 34077099]
  41. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Nov;14(9):839-44 [PMID: 16313211]
  42. Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Feb 24;44:105 [PMID: 37250682]
  43. Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:987659 [PMID: 36388323]
  44. BJOG. 2007 Aug;114(8):1010-7 [PMID: 17506793]
  45. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99 Suppl 1:S71-4 [PMID: 17727853]
  46. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Dec;20(12):1403-5 [PMID: 19789831]
  47. Public Health Rev. 2020 Sep 16;41:21 [PMID: 32974057]
  48. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):209-213 [PMID: 35780476]
  49. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):8-11 [PMID: 20524458]
  50. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1184-8 [PMID: 19152944]
  51. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Dec;19(12):1659-62 [PMID: 18690403]
  52. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jul 10;22(1):288 [PMID: 35811314]
  53. Afr Health Sci. 2015 Dec;15(4):1104-11 [PMID: 26958010]
  54. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148 Suppl 1:22-26 [PMID: 31943180]
  55. Urol Int. 2012;88(3):259-62 [PMID: 22414630]
  56. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2008 Jul-Sep;47(171):120-2 [PMID: 19079375]
  57. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;160(3):915-925 [PMID: 36031398]
  58. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Jun;66(3):180-4 [PMID: 27298528]
  59. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Oct 03;4:1188809 [PMID: 37854165]
  60. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 14;6(2):430-434 [PMID: 29531618]
  61. Trop Doct. 2023 Apr;53(2):207-209 [PMID: 36567630]
  62. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;114(1):51-5 [PMID: 21529805]
  63. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jan;88(1):71-5 [PMID: 15617716]
  64. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;170(4):1108-18; discussion 1118-20 [PMID: 8166194]
  65. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):328 [PMID: 27793119]
  66. Reprod Health. 2016 Nov 8;13(1):135 [PMID: 27821123]
  67. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):147-53 [PMID: 26317388]
  68. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 12;8:774 [PMID: 26654111]
  69. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e025355 [PMID: 31362960]
  70. Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):512-516 [PMID: 29201517]
  71. Asian J Urol. 2018 Jul;5(3):155-159 [PMID: 29988887]
  72. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011 Nov;4(6):259-265 [PMID: 22229049]
  73. Urology. 2016 Nov;97:80-85 [PMID: 27496296]
  74. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;120(2):178-82 [PMID: 23141371]
  75. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):93 [PMID: 31291928]
  76. BJOG. 2008 Nov;115(12):1564-9 [PMID: 19035992]
  77. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99 Suppl 1:S117-21 [PMID: 17880979]
  78. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996 Sep;51(9):568-74 [PMID: 8873157]
  79. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1726-1733 [PMID: 30987849]
  80. BMC Urol. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):41 [PMID: 27406310]
  81. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;148(3):331-337 [PMID: 31778211]
  82. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):197-201 [PMID: 30097667]
  83. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Feb;67(2):111-21 [PMID: 22325301]
  84. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 May;125(2):168-9 [PMID: 24629787]
  85. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):5 [PMID: 30616532]
  86. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;44(6):502-4 [PMID: 15598284]
  87. Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1835-41 [PMID: 16753486]
  88. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):248-58 [PMID: 22475385]
  89. Stud Fam Plann. 2012 Dec;43(4):255-72 [PMID: 23239246]
  90. Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Sep;27(9):831-839 [PMID: 35749231]
  91. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jul;89(7):945-51 [PMID: 20397760]
  92. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jan;19(1):73-9 [PMID: 17492390]
  93. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):578.e1-4 [PMID: 19200932]
  94. Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231192325 [PMID: 37596930]
  95. Glob Public Health. 2011;6(8):859-73 [PMID: 21390964]
  96. Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jun;20(6):813-9 [PMID: 25706671]
  97. BJOG. 2007 Sep;114(9):1172-6 [PMID: 17617196]
  98. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;18(3):249-51 [PMID: 15512070]
  99. Urol Ann. 2010 May;2(2):67-70 [PMID: 20882157]
  100. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Dec;21(12):1525-33 [PMID: 20700729]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Developing Countries
Pregnancy
Obstetric Labor Complications
Treatment Outcome
Vesicovaginal Fistula

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fistularepairsuccessfulobstetricsurgicalstudiesoutcomesmiddle-incomefistulaereviewproportiondeterminantscountriestreatmentfollowingsystematicmeta-analysislow-repairsloweducationlikelyvaginalcomplicationsBACKGROUND:Obstetricseriousdebilitatingproblemresultingtissuenecrosisreproductiveurinaryand/orlowergastrointestinaltractorgansdueprolongedlaborPrimaryreportsignificantlyvariableHoweveryetestimatedpooledidentifiedOBJECTIVE:estimateidentifyMETHODS:protocoldevelopedregisteredInternationalProspectiveRegisterSystematicReviewsIDCRD42022323630SearchesPubMedEmbaseCINAHLScopusdatabasesgrayliteraturesourcesperformedaccessedselectedCovidencequalityexaminedFinallydataextractedusingExcelanalyzedRsoftwareRESULTS:included799337screeningprocessanalysisreveals7785%95%CI:7514%8056%WomenattainprimarymarriedaliveneonatalcontrastwomenfemalegenitalmutilationprimiparitylargesizeclassificationIIurethraldamagescarringcircumferentialdefectmultiplepriorpostoperativelessCONCLUSION:remainssuboptimalHencestakeholderspolicymakersmustdesignimplementpoliciespromotingwomen'sadditioncareprovidersneedreachmanagecasesearlylikefibrosisoccurProportionscountries:

Similar Articles

Cited By