Factors influencing self-regulatory fatigue in patients undergoing chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer: a cross-sectional study.

Chunhui Lin, Fengzhi Zhang, Fangfang Yang, Yuanting Lin, Tian Tian, Kaige Shi, Manman Li, Xiaoxue Li
Author Information
  1. Chunhui Lin: Department of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  2. Fengzhi Zhang: Department of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  3. Fangfang Yang: Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  4. Yuanting Lin: Pediatric Rehabilitation Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  5. Tian Tian: Department of Gynecology, Henan Cancer Hospital & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  6. Kaige Shi: Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  7. Manman Li: Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  8. Xiaoxue Li: Department of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Abstract

Objective: To understand the current status of self-regulatory fatigue among gynecologic cancer chemotherapy patients and explore influencing factors.
Methods: Using convenient sampling, a total of 232 gynecological cancer chemotherapy patients from two tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan, China, were selected as study subjects from February 2023 to April 2023. General information questionnaire, Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale (SRF-S), Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (SUPPH) Scale, Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) were employed for data collection. The data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were executed to explore the correlates of self-regulatory fatigue, the significance level () was set at 0.05.
Results: The self-regulatory fatigue score of the 232 patients was 44 (36, 56). Binary logistic regression analyses revealed significant associations, demonstrating that residing in urban areas (=0.241, =0.015), having no comorbidities (=0.158, =0.015), increased perceived social support (=0.937, =0.001), strong self-efficacy =0.959, =0.021), and heightened psychological resilience (=0.895, <0.001) acted as protective factors against self-regulatory fatigue ( < 0.05).
Conclusion: Patients residing in rural areas, having more than two comorbidities, lower self-efficacy and psychological resilience levels, and lower perceived social support are indicative of higher levels of self-regulatory fatigue. Identifying these influencing factors can provide references and support for developing individualized support and intervention measures to improve patients' physical and mental well-being.

Keywords

References

  1. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):5849-5857 [PMID: 35364732]
  2. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Dec 23;51-52(51-52):865-872 [PMID: 31941574]
  3. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;45(4):E706-E718 [PMID: 34560709]
  4. J Clin Nurs. 2023 May;32(9-10):2041-2055 [PMID: 35194870]
  5. Psychooncology. 2021 Feb;30(2):212-220 [PMID: 32940943]
  6. Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):271-277 [PMID: 30380589]
  7. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):79-85 [PMID: 31743154]
  8. Int J Behav Med. 2013 Mar;20(1):13-21 [PMID: 21928059]
  9. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;45(1):12-20 [PMID: 32675630]
  10. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82 [PMID: 12964174]
  11. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7 [PMID: 2280326]
  12. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Feb;27(2):281-4 [PMID: 12605077]
  13. J Pain Res. 2013;6:181-8 [PMID: 23526193]
  14. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jun;52:101932 [PMID: 33799020]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1252-65 [PMID: 9599441]
  16. Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jul;27(6):1268-1276 [PMID: 33813978]
  17. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:801006 [PMID: 35548506]
  18. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Nov 28;10:228 [PMID: 27965551]
  19. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;44(6):465-472 [PMID: 32618622]
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  21. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103467 [PMID: 31810018]
  22. J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1773-801 [PMID: 17083666]
  23. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):367-377 [PMID: 36738867]
  24. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:953491 [PMID: 36211943]
  25. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Mar;59(3):646-657 [PMID: 31711968]
  26. Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):495-525 [PMID: 20565167]
  27. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Oct;30:8-14 [PMID: 29031318]
  28. BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 26;21(1):1147 [PMID: 34702204]
  29. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):234-243 [PMID: 33077261]
  30. Ann Behav Med. 2014 Dec;48(3):411-23 [PMID: 24802991]
  31. Res Nurs Health. 1996 Oct;19(5):421-9 [PMID: 8848626]
  32. Cancer Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;38(1):E13-20 [PMID: 24945261]
  33. BJOG. 2023 May;130(6):599-609 [PMID: 36648406]
  34. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):789 [PMID: 36376814]
  35. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jun;41(2):86-92 [PMID: 31373525]
  36. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:915959 [PMID: 35936327]
  37. Am J Community Psychol. 2007 Mar;39(1-2):133-44 [PMID: 17308966]
  38. Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60:182-8 [PMID: 25882596]
  39. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 May 06;14:1035 [PMID: 32419847]
  40. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Feb 25;15:443-451 [PMID: 33658768]
  41. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236572 [PMID: 32726344]
  42. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021 Jun;24(3):413-421 [PMID: 33161489]
  43. J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022 Feb 27;2(1):1-9 [PMID: 39035212]
  44. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Apr 01;17:941-949 [PMID: 37033294]
  45. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Oct;60:102193 [PMID: 36030751]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=0self-regulatoryfatiguesupportpatientsresiliencechemotherapyinfluencingfactorsScale0socialself-efficacypsychologicalgynecologiccancerexplore232twostudy2023datalogisticregression05residingareas015comorbiditiesperceived001lowerlevelsObjective:understandcurrentstatusamongMethods:UsingconvenientsamplingtotalgynecologicaltertiaryhospitalsZhengzhouHenanChinaselectedsubjectsFebruaryAprilGeneralinformationquestionnaireSelf-RegulatoryFatigueSRF-SStrategiesUsedPeoplePromoteHealthSUPPHConnor-DavidsonscaleCD-RISCPerceivedSocialSupportPSSSemployedcollectionanalyzedusingSPSS26softwareChi-squaretestbinaryexecutedcorrelatessignificancelevelsetResults:score443656Binaryanalysesrevealedsignificantassociationsdemonstratingurban241158increased937strong959021heightened895<0actedprotective<Conclusion:PatientsruralindicativehigherIdentifyingcanprovidereferencesdevelopingindividualizedinterventionmeasuresimprovepatients'physicalmentalwell-beingFactorsundergoingcancer:cross-sectionalfemalegenitalneoplasms

Similar Articles

Cited By