Professional regulation in the digital era: A qualitative case study of three professions in Ontario, Canada.

Kathleen Leslie, Sophia Myles, Abeer A Alraja, Patrick Chiu, Catharine J Schiller, Sioban Nelson, Tracey L Adams
Author Information
  1. Kathleen Leslie: Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada. ORCID
  2. Sophia Myles: Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada. ORCID
  3. Abeer A Alraja: Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Patrick Chiu: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ORCID
  5. Catharine J Schiller: School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  6. Sioban Nelson: Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  7. Tracey L Adams: Department of Sociology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Technology is transforming service delivery and practice in many regulated professions, altering required skills, scopes of practice, and the organization of professional work. Professional regulators face considerable pressure to facilitate technology-enabled work while adapting to digital changes in their practices and procedures. However, our understanding of how regulators are responding to technology-driven risks and the impact of technology on regulatory policy is limited. To examine the impact of technology and digitalization on regulation, we conducted an exploratory case study of the regulatory bodies for nursing, law, and social work in Ontario, Canada. Data were collected over two phases. First, we collected documents from the regulators' websites and regulatory consortiums. Second, we conducted key informant interviews with two representatives from each regulator. Data were thematically analyzed to explore the impact of technological change on regulatory activities and policies and to compare how regulatory structure and field shape this impact. Five themes were identified in our analysis: balancing efficiency potential with risks of certain technological advances; the potential for improving regulation through data analytics; considering how to regulate a technologically competent workforce; recalibrating pandemic emergency measures involving technology; and contemplating the future of technology on regulatory policy and practice. Regulators face ongoing challenges with providing equity-based approaches to regulating virtual practice, ensuring practitioners are technologically competent, and leveraging regulatory data to inform decision-making. Policymakers and regulators across Canada and internationally should prioritize risk-balanced policies, guidelines, and practice standards to support professional practice in the digital era.

References

  1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;201:356-63 [PMID: 24943567]
  2. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):2951-2968 [PMID: 35908207]
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e27259 [PMID: 34114963]
  4. J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(2):388-396 [PMID: 33163619]
  5. Br Paramed J. 2020 Dec 01;5(3):31-43 [PMID: 33456395]
  6. CMAJ. 2019 Oct 21;191(42):E1147-E1148 [PMID: 31636162]
  7. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  8. PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Apr 28;2(4):e0000163 [PMID: 37115785]
  9. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):491-497 [PMID: 31682262]
  10. J Prof Nurs. 2020 Nov - Dec;36(6):685-691 [PMID: 33308572]
  11. J Interprof Care. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):430-437 [PMID: 32648794]
  12. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Jul-Aug;24(4):525-536 [PMID: 31580178]
  13. Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98 [PMID: 31363513]
  14. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689 [PMID: 37740191]
  15. Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jan;19(1):11-15 [PMID: 30651238]
  16. Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Mar;36(2):113-118 [PMID: 36421019]
  17. Healthc Policy. 2022 Aug;18(1):17-25 [PMID: 36103233]
  18. Clin Soc Work J. 2022;50(1):3-10 [PMID: 33589847]
  19. Soc Work. 2013 Apr;58(2):163-72 [PMID: 23724579]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:50-62 [PMID: 27006033]

MeSH Term

Ontario
Humans
Qualitative Research
Social Work
Digital Technology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0regulatorypracticeimpacttechnologyworkregulatorsdigitalregulationCanadaprofessionsprofessionalProfessionalfaceriskspolicyconductedcasestudyOntarioDatacollectedtwotechnologicalpoliciespotentialdatatechnologicallycompetentTechnologytransformingservicedeliverymanyregulatedalteringrequiredskillsscopesorganizationconsiderablepressurefacilitatetechnology-enabledadaptingchangespracticesproceduresHoweverunderstandingrespondingtechnology-drivenlimitedexaminedigitalizationexploratorybodiesnursinglawsocialphasesFirstdocumentsregulators'websitesconsortiumsSecondkeyinformantinterviewsrepresentativesregulatorthematicallyanalyzedexplorechangeactivitiescomparestructurefieldshapeFivethemesidentifiedanalysis:balancingefficiencycertainadvancesimprovinganalyticsconsideringregulateworkforcerecalibratingpandemicemergencymeasuresinvolvingcontemplatingfutureRegulatorsongoingchallengesprovidingequity-basedapproachesregulatingvirtualensuringpractitionersleveraginginformdecision-makingPolicymakersacrossinternationallyprioritizerisk-balancedguidelinesstandardssupporteraera:qualitativethree

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)