Nodular/Keloidal Scleroderma with No Systemic Involvement-A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

Ioana Irina Trufin, Loredana Ungureanu, Salomea-Ruth Halm��gyi, Adina Patricia Apostu, Simona Corina ��enil��
Author Information
  1. Ioana Irina Trufin: Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  2. Loredana Ungureanu: Department of Dermatology, "Iuliu Ha��ieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ORCID
  3. Salomea-Ruth Halm��gyi: Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ORCID
  4. Adina Patricia Apostu: Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  5. Simona Corina ��enil��: Department of Dermatology, "Iuliu Ha��ieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Abstract

Nodular or keloidal scleroderma is a rare condition with unclear cause and sporadic mentions in the medical literature. It was first recognized in the 19th century, yet its classification is still debated due to the limited number of reported cases. This rare variant of scleroderma is associated with either progressive systemic sclerosis or localized morphea. Clinically, it presents with asymptomatic nodules or plaques, resembling spontaneous keloid formation, often found on the trunk and proximal extremities. Recent literature reviews show a predominance of women with a mean age of 44 years. Diagnosis relies on clinical and histopathological findings, which usually show overlapping features of both scleroderma and true keloids, secondarily to an excessive fibrosing reaction attributed to collagen formation. We present an unusual case of a 70-year-old female patient who displayed the coexistence of two distinct subtypes of morphea (nodular/keloidal and linear), and exclusive skin involvement, which contrasts with the typical presentation of nodular/keloidal scleroderma, often associated with organ-specific disease. However, recent publications have diverged from previous ones regarding systemic sclerosis, with no systemic involvement reported between 2018 and 2024, which we evaluated in our descriptive literature review. With less than 50 cases reported in total, our case underlines the importance of recognizing this rare disease, ensuring appropriate evaluation, treatment, and follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008 Aug;30(4):385-8 [PMID: 18645312]
  2. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2014 Jan;39(1):90-1 [PMID: 23875911]
  3. Clin Case Rep. 2020 Mar 09;8(5):837-839 [PMID: 32477528]
  4. J Dermatol. 1994 Oct;21(10):751-4 [PMID: 7798433]
  5. J Dermatol. 1995 Apr;22(4):267-71 [PMID: 7541812]
  6. An Bras Dermatol. 2013 Nov-Dec;88(6 Suppl 1):75-7 [PMID: 24346885]
  7. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003 Mar;28(2):171-3 [PMID: 12653707]
  8. Case Rep Dermatol. 2016 Nov 14;8(3):303-310 [PMID: 27920682]
  9. Dermatology. 2005;211(3):218-23 [PMID: 16205066]
  10. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984 Dec;11(6):1111-4 [PMID: 6512056]
  11. J Dermatol. 2005 Dec;32(12):1028-31 [PMID: 16471471]
  12. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003 Aug;25(4):327-30 [PMID: 12876490]
  13. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013 Jan;305(1):9-15 [PMID: 22965811]
  14. J Cutan Pathol. 2021 Nov;48(11):1329-1334 [PMID: 33258515]
  15. Int J Dermatol. 1992 Jun;31(6):422-3 [PMID: 1512096]
  16. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Jul;143(7):953-5 [PMID: 17638753]
  17. Eur J Dermatol. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1):87-93 [PMID: 23400240]
  18. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 18;10:1291941 [PMID: 38164220]
  19. Eur J Dermatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):95-6 [PMID: 26841724]
  20. Australas J Dermatol. 2020 May;61(2):e269-e273 [PMID: 31984476]
  21. Dermatology. 2008;216(2):109-17 [PMID: 18216472]
  22. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 17;291(6493):448-9 [PMID: 3926234]
  23. J Immunol. 2013 Apr 15;190(8):3905-15 [PMID: 23509348]
  24. Int J Dermatol. 1999 Jul;38(7):529-30 [PMID: 10440283]
  25. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2015;2015:635481 [PMID: 26697236]
  26. Am J Dermatopathol. 2020 Oct;42(10):766-768 [PMID: 32149834]
  27. Dermatology. 2003;207(2):130-2 [PMID: 12920359]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sclerodermamorpheakeloidalrareliteraturereportedsystemiccasesassociatedsclerosisformationoftenshowcasenodular/keloidalinvolvementdiseasenodularNodularconditionunclearcausesporadicmentionsmedicalfirstrecognized19thcenturyyetclassificationstilldebatedduelimitednumbervarianteitherprogressivelocalizedClinicallypresentsasymptomaticnodulesplaquesresemblingspontaneouskeloidfoundtrunkproximalextremitiesRecentreviewspredominancewomenmeanage44yearsDiagnosisreliesclinicalhistopathologicalfindingsusuallyoverlappingfeaturestruekeloidssecondarilyexcessivefibrosingreactionattributedcollagenpresentunusual70-year-oldfemalepatientdisplayedcoexistencetwodistinctsubtypeslinearexclusiveskincontraststypicalpresentationorgan-specificHoweverrecentpublicationsdivergedpreviousonesregarding20182024evaluateddescriptivereviewless50totalunderlinesimportancerecognizingensuringappropriateevaluationtreatmentfollow-upNodular/KeloidalSclerodermaSystemicInvolvement-ACaseReportReviewLiterature

Similar Articles

Cited By