Cost-effectiveness of PCV20 to Prevent Pneumococcal Disease in the Pediatric Population: A German Societal Perspective Analysis.

An Ta, Felicitas Kühne, Maren Laurenz, Christof von Eiff, Sophie Warren, Johnna Perdrizet
Author Information
  1. An Ta: Cytel, London, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Felicitas Kühne: Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany. ORCID
  3. Maren Laurenz: Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Christof von Eiff: Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  5. Sophie Warren: Pfizer Inc, New York City, New York, USA.
  6. Johnna Perdrizet: Pfizer Canada, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada. Johnna.Perdrizet@pfizer.com. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) covering 13 serotypes (PCV13) has been included by Germany's Standing Committee on Vaccinations for infants, resulting in major reductions in pneumococcal disease (PD). Higher-valent vaccines may further reduce PD burden. This cost-effectiveness analysis compared 20-valent PCV (PCV20) under a 3+1 schedule with 15-valent PCV (PCV15) and PCV13, both under 2+1 schedule, in Germany's pediatric population.
METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles over a 10-year time horizon was adapted to simulate the clinical and economic impact of pediatric vaccination with PCV20 versus lower-valent PCVs in Germany. The model used PCV13 clinical effectiveness and impact studies as well as PCV7 efficacy studies for vaccine direct and indirect effect estimates. Epidemiologic, utility, and medical cost inputs were obtained from published sources. Benefits and costs were discounted at 3% from a German societal perspective. Outcomes included PD cases, deaths, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
RESULTS: In the base case, PCV20 provided greater health benefits than PCV13, averting more cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD; 15,301), hospitalized and non-hospitalized pneumonia (460,197 and 472,365, respectively), otitis media (531,634), and 59,265 deaths over 10 years. This resulted in 904,854 additional QALYs and a total cost saving of €2,393,263,611, making PCV20 a dominant strategy compared with PCV13. Compared to PCV15, PCV20 was estimated to avert an additional 11,334 IPD, 704,948 pneumonia, and 441,643 otitis media cases, as well as 41,596 deaths. PCV20 was associated with a higher QALY gain and lower cost (i.e., dominance) compared with PCV15. The robustness of the results was confirmed through scenario analyses as well as deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: PCV20 3+1 dominated both PCV13 2+1 and PCV15 2+1 over 10 years. Replacing lower-valent PCVs with PCV20 would result in greater clinical and economic benefits, given PCV20's broader serotype coverage.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2010 Nov 19;28 Suppl 6:G23-9 [PMID: 21075266]
  2. Vaccine. 2012 Aug 31;30(40):5880-5 [PMID: 22771186]
  3. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Sep;25(9):779-81 [PMID: 16940833]
  4. BMJ. 2012 Oct 26;345:e6879 [PMID: 23103369]
  5. BMC Pediatr. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):204 [PMID: 35418046]
  6. Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Sep;7(3):353-371 [PMID: 29934878]
  7. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Sep;21(9):810-5 [PMID: 12352800]
  8. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jan;26(1):60-70 [PMID: 31055164]
  9. Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Apr;18(3):273-292 [PMID: 26905404]
  10. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 19;13:597 [PMID: 24354588]
  11. Vaccine. 2013 Jun 10;31(26):2839-47 [PMID: 23588084]
  12. Eur Respir J. 2015 Nov;46(5):1407-16 [PMID: 26160871]
  13. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 14;15:419 [PMID: 26468008]
  14. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Apr 24;12:101 [PMID: 22530841]
  15. Vaccine. 2022 Jun 23;40(29):3963-3974 [PMID: 35637067]
  16. Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Nov 08;150:e204 [PMID: 36345842]
  17. mBio. 2020 May 19;11(3): [PMID: 32430472]
  18. Vaccine. 2023 Jun 23;41(28):4081-4091 [PMID: 37263871]
  19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;18(4):441-451 [PMID: 29395999]
  20. Euro Surveill. 2015 Mar 12;20(10):21057 [PMID: 25788255]
  21. Vaccine. 2018 Jan 25;36(4):572-577 [PMID: 29258705]
  22. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;11(8): [PMID: 37631937]
  23. Eur Respir J. 2015 Jun;45(6):1632-41 [PMID: 25792633]
  24. Pathogens. 2020 Jan 22;9(2): [PMID: 31979079]
  25. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;55(8):791-9 [PMID: 12384194]
  26. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Mar;19(3):187-95 [PMID: 10749457]
  27. Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):e324-32 [PMID: 23821695]
  28. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):208 [PMID: 28292280]
  29. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 02;3(1):ofw020 [PMID: 26955644]
  30. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e744-e757 [PMID: 29903376]
  31. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jul;12(7):1809-1821 [PMID: 37318710]
  32. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 May;12(5):1351-1364 [PMID: 37079175]
  33. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Mar 4;17(3):909-918 [PMID: 32783576]
  34. Vaccine. 2004 Oct 22;22(31-32):4203-14 [PMID: 15474710]
  35. Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):933-944 [PMID: 31030292]
  36. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;11(7): [PMID: 37514984]
  37. Clin Ther. 2013 Feb;35(2):119-34 [PMID: 23312274]
  38. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):1191-1210 [PMID: 30243584]
  39. Vaccine. 2015 Sep 22;33(39):5072-9 [PMID: 26297875]
  40. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2018 Sep 8;72:521-549 [PMID: 30200849]
  41. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jan;5(1):e51-e59 [PMID: 27955789]
  42. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Nov;14(136): [PMID: 29093131]
  43. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Sep 1;33(5):737-9 [PMID: 11477523]
  44. Vaccine. 2017 Sep 5;35(37):5058-5064 [PMID: 28778617]
  45. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210278 [PMID: 30625215]
  46. Value Health. 2023 Apr;26(4):598-611 [PMID: 36328324]
  47. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 26;28(33):5485-90 [PMID: 20554066]
  48. BMJ. 2010 Jun 02;340:c2509 [PMID: 20519267]
  49. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):921-932 [PMID: 37881844]
  50. Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Jun;13(6):1333-1358 [PMID: 38733494]
  51. Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Apr;19(3):473-481 [PMID: 29468343]
  52. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2257426 [PMID: 37771288]
  53. Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Feb;10(1):25-38 [PMID: 18379830]
  54. J Infect. 2012 Jan;64(1):54-67 [PMID: 22085813]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PCV20PCV13pneumococcaldiseasePCV15vaccinePCVPDcompared2+1clinicalwellcostcasesdeathsyearspneumoniaotitismediaPneumococcalconjugateincludedGermany'scost-effectiveness3+1schedulepediatricmodeleconomicimpactlower-valentPCVsstudiescostsGermanQALYsgreaterbenefitsinvasiveIPD10additionalanalysesCost-effectivenessPediatricINTRODUCTION:Since2009covering13serotypesStandingCommitteeVaccinationsinfantsresultingmajorreductionsHigher-valentvaccinesmayreduceburdenanalysis20-valent15-valentpopulationMETHODS:Markovannualcycles10-yeartimehorizonadaptedsimulatevaccinationversusGermanyusedeffectivenessPCV7efficacydirectindirecteffectestimatesEpidemiologicutilitymedicalinputsobtainedpublishedsourcesBenefitsdiscounted3%societalperspectiveOutcomesquality-adjustedlifeincrementalratiosICERsRESULTS:basecaseprovidedhealthaverting15301hospitalizednon-hospitalized460197472365respectively53163459265resulted904854totalsaving€2393263611makingdominantstrategyComparedestimatedavert1133470494844164341596associatedhigherQALYgainloweriedominancerobustnessresultsconfirmedscenariodeterministicprobabilisticsensitivityCONCLUSION:dominatedReplacingresultgivenPCV20'sbroaderserotypecoveragePreventDiseasePopulation:SocietalPerspectiveAnalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By