The component and structure of interpersonal trust.

Chao Fu, Shuai Yang, Mengying Zhai, Tingjun Yong, Chun Zheng, Xueqin Ma, Guangyan Hou, Ping Su
Author Information
  1. Chao Fu: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai, 810016, PR China.
  2. Shuai Yang: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai, 810016, PR China.
  3. Mengying Zhai: Chengdu No.11 Kindergarten, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610042, PR China.
  4. Tingjun Yong: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai, 810016, PR China.
  5. Chun Zheng: Qinghai Cardio-Cerebrovascular Specialty Hospital, Qinghai High Altitude Medical Research Institute, Xining, 810012, PR China.
  6. Xueqin Ma: Qinghai Cardio-Cerebrovascular Specialty Hospital, Qinghai High Altitude Medical Research Institute, Xining, 810012, PR China.
  7. Guangyan Hou: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai, 810016, PR China.
  8. Ping Su: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai, 810016, PR China.

Abstract

Prior research has identified trust trait, trust expectation, trust risk and trust behavior as integral components of interpersonal trust. However, there still lack an in-depth exploration of the structural relationships among these integral components-how these integral components collectively constitute interpersonal trust. The current study innovatively proposed that interpersonal trust is anchored by individual trust trait, mediated by the dynamic equilibrium between trust risk and trust expectation, and culminates in trust behavior as the outcome. Interpersonal trust results from the synergistic interplay of individual and environmental factors. We called such structural relationships as the pyramid structure model of interpersonal trust, and proved its rationality by empirical evidence.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers. 1967 Dec;35(4):651-65 [PMID: 4865583]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3721-6 [PMID: 18316737]
  3. Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):70-73 [PMID: 31221770]
  4. Neurosci Bull. 2021 Apr;37(4):511-522 [PMID: 33559840]
  5. Eur J Pain. 2018 Jan;22(1):150-160 [PMID: 28913979]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 18;120(29):e2213824120 [PMID: 37428923]
  7. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):1138-1149 [PMID: 33978758]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul;107(1):122-41 [PMID: 24819869]
  9. Neurosci Bull. 2022 Mar;38(3):275-289 [PMID: 34628592]
  10. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 12;10:2656 [PMID: 31920773]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trustinterpersonalTrusttraitexpectationriskbehaviorintegralstructurecomponentsstructuralrelationshipsindividualInterpersonalPriorresearchidentifiedHoweverstilllackin-depthexplorationamongcomponents-howcollectivelyconstitutecurrentstudyinnovativelyproposedanchoredmediateddynamicequilibriumculminatesoutcomeresultssynergisticinterplayenvironmentalfactorscalledpyramidmodelprovedrationalityempiricalevidencecomponent

Similar Articles

Cited By