Does the level of burnout differ between occupational groups in Lithuania?

Gintar�� Kalinien��, R��ta Ustinavi��ien��, Dalia Luk��ien��, Rasa ��utautien��, Jolita Kirvaitien��, Vidmantas Vai��iulis
Author Information
  1. Gintar�� Kalinien��: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  2. R��ta Ustinavi��ien��: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  3. Dalia Luk��ien��: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  4. Rasa ��utautien��: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  5. Jolita Kirvaitien��: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  6. Vidmantas Vai��iulis: Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Abstract

Background: The strain on workers of the healthcare system and education sector increased psychological distress and burnout. This study aimed to distinguish the occupational group that is the most affected by occupational burnout and to reveal the scope of psychosocial risk factors among each occupational group.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that analyzed burnout syndrome among 1,046 participants of different occupational groups in association with psychosocial work environment factors in Lithuania. The anonymous questionnaire was composed of the standardized Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). To find out associations between psychosocial work environment factors and burnout dimensions, a multiple logistic regression model using the stepwise method was applied.
Results: The burnout levels in all three dimensions (personal, work-related, and client-related burnout) were significantly higher in physicians' and nurses' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers (���<���0.05). The job demands were associated with the personal burnout subscale for all occupations, except public health specialists - each one-unit increase of this variable significantly increased the probability of personal burnout from 10 to 16%, respectively by the occupation. Co-worker support was found to have a buffering effect for all occupational groups, except managers - and significantly reduced personal burnout for physicians (OR���=���0.80), nurses (OR���=���0.75), public health specialists (OR���=���0.75), and teachers (OR���=���0.79).
Conclusion: The burnout levels in all three dimensions differed between occupational groups: there were significantly higher in physicians' and nurses' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers. Considering the occupational preventive measures in the healthcare sector attention should be paid to the reduction of workload and ensuring good relations between co-workers.

Keywords

References

  1. Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 18;72(7):439-445 [PMID: 35657324]
  2. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 11;11:577886 [PMID: 33262727]
  3. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;34(4):413-419 [PMID: 34001698]
  4. Work. 2022;71(2):407-415 [PMID: 35068412]
  5. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;34(3):553-560 [PMID: 33004166]
  6. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Jun;92(2):645-653 [PMID: 32885320]
  7. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jul;17(7):921-926 [PMID: 32479798]
  8. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265659 [PMID: 35324961]
  9. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1751-1758.e5 [PMID: 33256955]
  10. Australas Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;29(1):26-30 [PMID: 33043677]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 08;18(4): [PMID: 33567788]
  12. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):122-128 [PMID: 33267652]
  13. Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct-Dec;V(4):1-6 [PMID: 34018959]
  14. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976 [PMID: 32202646]
  15. J Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jan 1;64(1):e20-e27 [PMID: 34789681]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 27;19(17): [PMID: 36078422]
  17. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2017 Sep;11(3):230-236 [PMID: 28991605]
  18. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55 [PMID: 9805280]
  19. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e60-e65 [PMID: 32283221]
  20. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Dec;31(6):1480-1491 [PMID: 35957615]
  21. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Jul 23;11(3):795-803 [PMID: 34563070]
  22. Gac Med Mex. 2011 Mar-Apr;147(2):97-103 [PMID: 21527961]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8): [PMID: 33924084]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21): [PMID: 36361111]

MeSH Term

Humans
Lithuania
Cross-Sectional Studies
Male
Female
Adult
Burnout, Professional
Surveys and Questionnaires
Middle Aged
Workplace
Risk Factors
Occupations
Health Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnoutoccupationalpsychosocialgroupspersonalsignificantlypublichealthOR���=���0healthcarefactorsworkenvironmentdimensionsteachersmanagerssectorincreasedstudygroupriskamonglevelsthreehigherphysicians'nurses'comparedprofessionalsexceptspecialists-75Background:strainworkerssystemeducationpsychologicaldistressaimeddistinguishaffectedrevealscopeMethods:cross-sectionalanalyzedsyndrome1046participantsdifferentassociationLithuaniaanonymousquestionnairecomposedstandardizedJobContentQuestionnaireJCQCopenhagenBurnoutInventoryCBIfindassociationsmultiplelogisticregressionmodelusingstepwisemethodappliedResults:work-relatedclient-related���<���005jobdemandsassociatedsubscaleoccupationsone-unitincreasevariableprobability1016%respectivelyoccupationCo-workersupportfoundbufferingeffectreducedphysicians80nurses79Conclusion:differedgroups:Consideringpreventivemeasuresattentionpaidreductionworkloadensuringgoodrelationsco-workersleveldifferLithuania?burnoutworkerteacher

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.