Technical Sprinting in the Early Phase of Hamstring Injury Rehabilitation to Accelerate Return to Full Participation in Track and Field Athletes: A Comparative Study of Two Rehabilitation Strategies.

Nilesh Makwana, Jayesh Bane, Lipsa Ray, Bhagyashree Karkera, James Hillier
Author Information
  1. Nilesh Makwana: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, IND.
  2. Jayesh Bane: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Odisha Reliance Foundation Athletics High Performance Centre, Bhubaneshwar, IND.
  3. Lipsa Ray: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Odisha Reliance Foundation Athletics High Performance Centre, Bhubaneshwar, IND.
  4. Bhagyashree Karkera: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, IND.
  5. James Hillier: Coaching Department, Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, IND.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hamstring injuries are common in track and field athletes with a higher incidence in males than females. It causes a significant loss in training time and a decline in performance. This study evaluated rehabilitation strategies to accelerate return to full participation following hamstring injury.
METHODS: Thirty-three athletes (22 males; 11 females) were screened from November 2021 to October 2023 until their final major competition. Out of these, 17 athletes with hamstring injuries were included in this study which were further divided into two groups, A (n=8) and B (n=9), using stratified random sampling with single blinding. Group A received technical sprints using mini hurdles as part of their training from the early stages of rehabilitation, while Group B underwent high-volume low-intensity rehabilitation before progressing to sprints. The progress of each group was monitored on a weekly basis. The average time loss was calculated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft�� Corp., Redmond, WA) and Google Forms (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA) with built-in validation.
RESULTS:  The two groups demonstrated a significant difference in recovery times. In group A, the length of hamstring tenderness (LHT) improved from 9 �� 2.7 (95% CI 2.27) to 0.15 �� 0.3 (95% CI 0.62), active total knee extension (ATKE) from 161.8 �� 7.1 (95% CI 5.95) to 175.4 �� 2 (95% CI 2.3), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the isometric test from 5.6 �� 1.09 (95% CI 0.88) to 0.6 �� 0.5 (95% CI 0.63) with p<0.05, and in Group B, LHT improved from 6.8 �� 2.1 (95% CI 1.62) to 0.6 �� 0.7 (95% CI 0.55), ATKE improved from 168.7 �� 8.2 (95% CI 6.3) to 178.7 �� 2.7 (95% CI 2.06) and NPRS with resisted isometric test improved from 6 �� 1.4 (95% CI 1.08) to 0.8 �� 0.7 (95% CI 0.51) with p<0.05. However, Group A took an average of 3.55 weeks (1.22 SD 95% CI 1.08) and Group B took an average of 4.53 weeks (1.98 SD, 95% CI 1.52) to resume full participation. Three athletes from Group A and six athletes from Group B experienced hamstring tightness during the competition, two athletes from Group B were forced to withdraw from the competition due to hamstring reinjury.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that an early technical sprint program can facilitate an early return to full participation. This research can be a guide toward accelerated and integrated hamstring injury rehabilitation among track and field athletes.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(7):532-9 [PMID: 24620041]
  2. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(13):1366-75 [PMID: 25514378]
  3. Br J Sports Med. 2016 May;50(10):619-30 [PMID: 26887415]
  4. Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 07;12:694604 [PMID: 34305648]
  5. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Apr;46(4):776-86 [PMID: 24145724]
  6. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):304-10 [PMID: 21051422]
  7. Sports Med. 2024 Apr;54(4):783-793 [PMID: 37725240]
  8. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Dec;20(10):1072-8 [PMID: 16137810]
  9. Sports Med. 2023 Dec;53(12):2321-2346 [PMID: 37668895]
  10. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1347-51 [PMID: 25031367]
  11. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Jun 1;V18(3):626-635 [PMID: 37425103]
  12. Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):251-267 [PMID: 29116573]
  13. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Feb;47(2):373-80 [PMID: 24911288]
  14. J Vis Exp. 2018 May 1;(135): [PMID: 29781992]
  15. Gait Posture. 2010 May;32(1):136-40 [PMID: 20395142]
  16. J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Sep;6(3):283-289 [PMID: 30356628]
  17. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jan 21;2:609636 [PMID: 33554110]
  18. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):502-4; discussion 502-4 [PMID: 15273195]
  19. J Sports Sci. 2017 May;35(10):960-966 [PMID: 27388971]
  20. Joints. 2020 May 25;7(3):115-126 [PMID: 34195539]
  21. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Feb;50(2):91-103 [PMID: 32005093]
  22. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jan;37(1):108-14 [PMID: 15632676]
  23. Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):332-8 [PMID: 19038549]
  24. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;55(17):947-948 [PMID: 33837004]
  25. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Nov 18;17(3):374-383 [PMID: 34794121]
  26. J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Apr;34(4):327-334 [PMID: 35400840]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.095%CI0��1Group2hamstring7athletesB6rehabilitationimproved38trackfullparticipationinjurycompetitiontwousingearlyaverage54Hamstringinjuriesfieldmalesfemalessignificantlosstrainingtimeperformancestudyreturn22groupstechnicalsprintsgroupGoogleLHT62ATKENPRSisometrictestp<0055508tookweeksSDsprintcanRehabilitationsportsINTRODUCTION:commonhigherincidencecausesdeclineevaluatedstrategiesacceleratefollowingMETHODS:Thirty-three11screenedNovember2021October2023finalmajor17includeddividedn=8n=9stratifiedrandomsamplingsingleblindingreceivedminihurdlespartstagesunderwenthigh-volumelow-intensityprogressingprogressmonitoredweeklybasiscalculatedMicrosoftExcelMicrosoft��CorpRedmondWAFormsIncMountainViewCAbuilt-invalidationRESULTS: Thedemonstrateddifferencerecoverytimeslengthtenderness92715activetotalkneeextension16195175NumericPainRatingScale09886316817806resisted51However539852resumeThreesixexperiencedtightnessforcedwithdrawduereinjuryCONCLUSIONS:findingsindicateprogramfacilitateresearchguidetoward acceleratedintegratedamongfield athletesTechnicalSprintingEarlyPhaseInjuryAccelerateReturnFullParticipationTrackFieldAthletes:ComparativeStudyTwoStrategies

Similar Articles

Cited By