Discussing the Debate: Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Sankalp Yadav
Author Information
  1. Sankalp Yadav: Medicine, Shri Madan Lal Khurana Chest Clinic, New Delhi, IND.

Abstract

This editorial touches on the persistent debate related to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy. It focuses on the different approaches involving leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor PRP formulations of the PRP. It looks into the reasons behind these approaches, their potential effects on clinical practice, i.e., pros and cons, and the evidence supporting each method within the field of regenerative medicine. Examining these different views highlights the complexity of PRP therapy. It's important to proceed carefully, relying on evidence to enhance patient outcomes. Understanding the ongoing debates can help healthcare professionals make informed decisions. We need to consider various factors before implementing PRP therapy, ensuring it's done responsibly.

Keywords

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Mar 16;104(6):e26 [PMID: 35293895]
  2. Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 06;11(1): [PMID: 36672650]
  3. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun;10(2):240-247 [PMID: 29854349]
  4. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Oct;10(Suppl 1):S7-S12 [PMID: 31700202]
  5. Trends Cell Biol. 2005 Nov;15(11):599-607 [PMID: 16202600]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PRPplatelet-richplasmatherapyleukocyte-richleukocyte-poorprpdifferentapproachesevidencePlatelet-RichPlasmaeditorialtouchespersistentdebaterelatedfocuses oninvolvingformulationslooksreasonsbehindpotentialeffectsclinicalpracticeieprosconssupportingmethodwithinfieldregenerativemedicine ExaminingviewshighlightscomplexityimportantproceedcarefullyrelyingenhancepatientoutcomesUnderstandingongoingdebatescanhelphealthcareprofessionalsmakeinformeddecisionsneedconsidervariousfactorsimplementingensuringdoneresponsiblyDiscussingDebate:Leukocyte-RichVersusLeukocyte-Poorvsleukocytes

Similar Articles

Cited By