Perceptions of HPV-Linked Oropharyngeal Cancer Risk Messages Among a Sample of Young Adult Men in the US: A Pilot Study.
Alyssa H Harrell, George C Kueppers, Robin C Vanderpool, David Dean, Jacob A Rohde
Author Information
Alyssa H Harrell: Office of the Associate Director, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. ORCID
George C Kueppers: Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robin C Vanderpool: Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David Dean: Health Behaviors Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jacob A Rohde: Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Awareness of risk for oropharyngeal cancer from oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is low among men in the United States. This pilot study tested messages communicating oral HPV and oropharyngeal cancer risk among a sample of U.S. young adult men (aged 18-26). Six oral HPV and cancer risk messages were tested in an online survey. Participants ( = 68) were randomly assigned to one of two message sets, each containing three unique text-based messages. Participants evaluated messages separately based on various measures (e.g., perceived message effectiveness [PME], novelty). One-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess evaluation differences within message sets. Participants provided open-ended feedback about each message, which were synthesized into overarching themes. Participants were receptive to the risk messages, rating them high on PME (mean range = 3.72-4.25 out of 5) and other measures. Analyses identified three high-performing messages. For example, participants rated a message about HPV-linked oropharyngeal cancer risk rates in men versus women higher on attention and novelty than two other messages in the same set (both s < .05). Participants were shown three messages (instead of all six) in each message set to minimize survey fatigue. Common themes from open-ended feedback were that participants liked the short-form structure of the messages and that the messages used gender-tailored language. In conclusion, oral HPV and oropharyngeal cancer risk messages may be useful for increasing risk awareness among men in the U.S. Further work should test such messages in rigorous experimental contexts to assess their efficacy in modifying other health outcomes, such as HPV vaccination behaviors.
