Development and Verification of a Full Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Adult Volunteers that Accounts for Nonlinear Bioavailability.

Matthijs W van Hoogdalem, Ryota Tanaka, Trevor N Johnson, Alexander A Vinks, Tomoyuki Mizuno
Author Information
  1. Matthijs W van Hoogdalem: Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H., R.T., A.A.V., T.M.); James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H.); Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom (T.N.J.); and Department of Pediatrics (A.A.V., T.M.) and Center for Addiction Research (A.A.V., T.M.), College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  2. Ryota Tanaka: Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H., R.T., A.A.V., T.M.); James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H.); Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom (T.N.J.); and Department of Pediatrics (A.A.V., T.M.) and Center for Addiction Research (A.A.V., T.M.), College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. ORCID
  3. Trevor N Johnson: Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H., R.T., A.A.V., T.M.); James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H.); Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom (T.N.J.); and Department of Pediatrics (A.A.V., T.M.) and Center for Addiction Research (A.A.V., T.M.), College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. ORCID
  4. Alexander A Vinks: Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H., R.T., A.A.V., T.M.); James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H.); Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom (T.N.J.); and Department of Pediatrics (A.A.V., T.M.) and Center for Addiction Research (A.A.V., T.M.), College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. ORCID
  5. Tomoyuki Mizuno: Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H., R.T., A.A.V., T.M.); James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.W.v.H.); Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom (T.N.J.); and Department of Pediatrics (A.A.V., T.M.) and Center for Addiction Research (A.A.V., T.M.), College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio tomoyuki.mizuno@cchmc.org. ORCID

Abstract

Sublingual buprenorphine is used for opioid use disorder and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The study aimed to develop a full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that can adequately describe dose- and formulation-dependent bioavailability of buprenorphine. Simcyp (v21.0) was used for model construction. Four linear regression models (i.e., untransformed or log transformed for dose or proportion sublingually absorbed) were explored to describe sublingual absorption of buprenorphine across dose. Published clinical trial data not used in model development were used for verification. The PBPK model's predictive performance was deemed adequate if the geometric means of ratios between predicted and observed (P/O) area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (C), and time to reach C (T) fell within the 1.25-fold prediction error range. Sublingual buprenorphine absorption was best described by a regression model with logarithmically transformed dose. By integrating this nonlinear absorption profile, the PBPK model adequately predicted buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) following administration of sublingual tablets and solution across a dose range of 2-32 mg, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval) P/O ratios for AUC and C equaling 0.99 (0.86-1.12) and 1.24 (1.09-1.40), respectively, and median (5th to 95th percentile) for T equaling 1.11 (0.69-1.57). A verified PBPK model was developed that adequately predicts dose- and formulation-dependent buprenorphine PK following sublingual administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed in this study is the first to adequately predict dose- and formulation-dependent sublingual buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. Accurate prediction was facilitated by the incorporation of a novel nonlinear absorption model. The developed model will serve as the foundation for maternal-fetal PBPK modeling to predict maternal and fetal buprenorphine exposures to optimize buprenorphine treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

References

  1. J Pharm Sci. 2006 Jun;95(6):1238-57 [PMID: 16639716]
  2. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 May;13(5):665-73 [PMID: 7082534]
  3. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Jun;197(3):517-32 [PMID: 945347]
  4. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Feb;60(2):249-259 [PMID: 32939690]
  5. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;84(9):2075-2087 [PMID: 29873094]
  6. Pediatrics. 2020 Nov;146(5): [PMID: 33106341]
  7. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Oct 24;72(1):75-83 [PMID: 14563545]
  8. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Jan;37(1):31-7 [PMID: 9048270]
  9. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(7):661-80 [PMID: 15966752]
  10. Clin Ther. 2016 Feb;38(2):358-69 [PMID: 26804639]
  11. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;46(2):179-92 [PMID: 16432270]
  12. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Nov;28(5):667-72 [PMID: 7438685]
  13. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(37):5994-6004 [PMID: 22747535]
  14. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Sep 6;75(3):253-60 [PMID: 15283946]
  15. Pain Med. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):143-152 [PMID: 29309700]
  16. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jul 14;151(3):457-61 [PMID: 2850923]
  17. Drug Metab Lett. 2009 Apr;3(2):101-7 [PMID: 19601871]
  18. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(5):329-40 [PMID: 15080765]
  19. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;100(6):1244-9 [PMID: 12468169]
  20. JAMA. 2018 Apr 03;319(13):1362-1374 [PMID: 29614184]
  21. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;111(2):496-508 [PMID: 34679189]
  22. Pharmaceutics. 2024 Mar 08;16(3): [PMID: 38543269]
  23. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1989 Apr;64(1):3-16 [PMID: 2546225]
  24. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Aug 1;131(3):258-62 [PMID: 23246635]
  25. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;83(11):2458-2473 [PMID: 28688108]
  26. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):225-44 [PMID: 9314613]
  27. Drugs R D. 2019 Sep;19(3):255-265 [PMID: 31197606]
  28. Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Jul;35(7):670-80 [PMID: 26172282]
  29. Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jun;234:108045 [PMID: 34813863]
  30. Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;56(2):334-8 [PMID: 10419552]
  31. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jul 17;69(28):897-903 [PMID: 32673301]
  32. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;50(3):253-8 [PMID: 20618243]
  33. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021 Jan;17(1):87-103 [PMID: 33049155]
  34. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Jun;39(6):619-23 [PMID: 10354966]
  35. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020 Jan;46(1):1-7 [PMID: 31914818]
  36. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005 May;33(5):689-95 [PMID: 15743975]
  37. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Dec;29(4):307-12 [PMID: 16311183]
  38. J Pharm Sci. 2009 Dec;98(12):4928-40 [PMID: 19370547]
  39. Pharm Res. 2009 May;26(5):1073-83 [PMID: 19184618]
  40. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(4):1441-1451 [PMID: 34337764]
  41. Eur Addict Res. 2009;15(3):128-34 [PMID: 19332991]
  42. Pain Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):428-50 [PMID: 20492579]
  43. BJOG. 2009 Apr;116(5):665-71 [PMID: 19220239]
  44. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan;81(1):50-8 [PMID: 17185999]
  45. JAMA. 2021 Jul 13;326(2):154-164 [PMID: 34255008]
  46. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:414-417 [PMID: 24290979]
  47. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Apr 9;74(1):37-43 [PMID: 15072805]
  48. Behav Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;13(7):557-70 [PMID: 12409994]
  49. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):479-83 [PMID: 21515002]
  50. J Anal Toxicol. 1996 Oct;20(6):369-78 [PMID: 8889672]
  51. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 Jul;44(7):1090-8 [PMID: 26862026]
  52. NIDA Res Monogr. 1990;105:569 [PMID: 1876122]
  53. J Perinatol. 2021 Jun;41(6):1213-1215 [PMID: 33495535]
  54. J Med Chem. 1996 Oct 25;39(22):4377-81 [PMID: 8893832]
  55. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jun;103(6):1029-1037 [PMID: 29516490]
  56. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep 15;122:125-133 [PMID: 29940217]
  57. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999 Aug 2;56(1):55-60 [PMID: 10462093]

Grants

  1. P30 HD106451/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR001425/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Buprenorphine
Administration, Sublingual
Adult
Models, Biological
Biological Availability
Male
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Analgesics, Opioid
Young Adult
Area Under Curve
Middle Aged
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Nonlinear Dynamics

Chemicals

Buprenorphine
Analgesics, Opioid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0buprenorphinemodelPBPKusedadequately0dosesublingualabsorption1Sublingualopioiddose-formulation-dependentCdevelopedneonatalwithdrawalsyndromestudyphysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticdescriberegressiontransformedacrossgeometricratiospredictedP/OAUCTpredictionrangenonlinearpharmacokineticsPKfollowingadministrationequalingpredictusedisorderaimeddevelopfullcanbioavailabilitySimcypv21constructionFourlinearmodelsieuntransformedlogproportionsublinguallyabsorbedexploredPublishedclinicaltrialdatadevelopmentverificationmodel'spredictiveperformancedeemedadequatemeansobservedareacurvepeakconcentrationtimereachfellwithin25-folderrorbestdescribedlogarithmicallyintegratingprofiletabletssolution2-32mgmean95%confidenceinterval9986-1122409-140respectivelymedian5th95thpercentile1169-157verifiedpredictsSIGNIFICANCESTATEMENT:firstAccuratefacilitatedincorporationnovelwillservefoundationmaternal-fetalmodelingmaternalfetalexposuresoptimizetreatmentDevelopmentVerificationFullPhysiologicallyBasedPharmacokineticModelBuprenorphineHealthyAdultVolunteersAccountsNonlinearBioavailability

Similar Articles

Cited By