Treatment of harmful gambling: a scoping review of United Kingdom-based intervention research.

Christopher J Seel, Matthew Jones, Darren R Christensen, Richard May, Alice E Hoon, Simon Dymond
Author Information
  1. Christopher J Seel: School of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  2. Matthew Jones: School of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  3. Darren R Christensen: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
  4. Richard May: School of Psychology and Therapeutic Studies, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF371DL, UK.
  5. Alice E Hoon: Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  6. Simon Dymond: School of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. s.o.dymond@swansea.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding and treating the harm caused by gambling is a growing international psychiatric and public health challenge. Treatment of gambling harm may involve psychological and pharmacological intervention, in conjunction with peer support. This scoping review was conducted to identify, for the first time, the characteristics and extent of United Kingdom (UK) based gambling treatment research. We reviewed studies conducted among people seeking treatment for disordered or harmful gambling in the UK, the settings, research designs, and outcome measures used, and to identify any treatment research gaps.
METHODS: Systematic searches of PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were carried out for gambling treatment research or evaluation studies conducted in the UK. Studies were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention or treatment designed to improve symptoms of harmful or problematic gambling, reported outcomes of interventions on treatment adherence, gambling symptoms, or behaviours using standardised measures, were conducted in the UK, and were published since 2000.
RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Four were retrospective chart reviews, two were single-participant case reports, one described a retrospective case series, and one employed a cross-sectional design. None used an experimental design.
CONCLUSION: The limited number of studies included in this review highlights a relative paucity of gambling treatment research conducted in UK settings. Further work should seek to identify potential barriers and obstacles to conducting gambling treatment research in the UK.

Keywords

References

  1. J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):827-833 [PMID: 30238780]
  2. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):105 [PMID: 33596853]
  3. J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):987-997 [PMID: 29383610]
  4. Assessment. 2023 Dec;30(8):2387-2397 [PMID: 36680458]
  5. Addict Behav. 2017 Nov;74:33-40 [PMID: 28570912]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008937 [PMID: 23152266]
  7. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):950-960 [PMID: 19803574]
  8. Internet Interv. 2019 Mar 06;17:100239 [PMID: 30906694]
  9. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Dec 20;41(4):858-863 [PMID: 30239763]
  10. BMJ. 2015 May 14;350:h1793 [PMID: 25976162]
  11. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Jul 25;5(1):51 [PMID: 31346179]
  12. Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:41-45 [PMID: 32402593]
  13. Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:63-66 [PMID: 32684349]
  14. J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1277-1292 [PMID: 28332064]
  15. Med J Aust. 2011 Dec 19;195(11-12):664-5 [PMID: 22171860]
  16. Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e437-e446 [PMID: 35487229]
  17. Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25 [PMID: 29345484]
  18. J Behav Addict. 2021 Jul 28;10(3):690-700 [PMID: 34319902]
  19. Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):e80 [PMID: 33125931]
  20. J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):725-730 [PMID: 30032352]
  21. Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):411-426 [PMID: 28891116]
  22. J Sch Psychol. 2021 Dec;89:91-105 [PMID: 34836578]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jan;115(1):56-85 [PMID: 33205436]
  24. Addiction. 2023 Sep;118(9):1661-1674 [PMID: 37381589]
  25. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143 [PMID: 30453902]
  26. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Mar;25(2):302-310 [PMID: 29226494]
  27. J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):373-386 [PMID: 31302803]
  28. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6 [PMID: 26134548]
  29. BMJ. 2015 May 14;350:h1738 [PMID: 25976398]
  30. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 3;8(4):e018804 [PMID: 29615445]
  31. J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):1107-17 [PMID: 25753359]
  32. Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):2119-2121 [PMID: 34882889]
  33. J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):987-1011 [PMID: 35678905]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  35. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Apr;147:105071 [PMID: 36738812]
  36. BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Aug 24;2011: [PMID: 22678941]
  37. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;34(5):508-513 [PMID: 34282103]
  38. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;9(4):321-329 [PMID: 35180386]
  39. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9:CD008936 [PMID: 36130734]
  40. Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 22;8:320 [PMID: 32793537]
  41. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jun;69:100-10 [PMID: 25917008]
  42. F1000Res. 2018 Apr 9;7:434 [PMID: 30090625]
  43. Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):2968-2977 [PMID: 33620735]
  44. J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):875-886 [PMID: 31300931]
  45. Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):2972-2985 [PMID: 35830876]
  46. Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:11-16 [PMID: 32409100]
  47. Addict Behav. 2021 Mar;114:106713 [PMID: 33268184]
  48. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;74:101784 [PMID: 31759246]
  49. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 22;11(1):13033 [PMID: 34158553]
  50. Addiction. 2014 Mar;109(3):341-4 [PMID: 24524311]
  51. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jul;44(8):1354-1361 [PMID: 30986818]

MeSH Term

Gambling
Humans
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gamblingtreatmentresearchUKconductedreviewstudiesTreatmentinterventionidentifyUnitedharmfulharmscopingKingdomsettingsmeasuresusedincludedsymptomsretrospectivecaseonedesignBACKGROUND:UnderstandingtreatingcausedgrowinginternationalpsychiatricpublichealthchallengemayinvolvepsychologicalpharmacologicalconjunctionpeersupportfirsttimecharacteristicsextentbasedreviewedamongpeopleseekingdisordereddesignsoutcomegapsMETHODS:SystematicsearchesPsycInfoPsycArticlesScopusPubMedWebSciencedatabasescarriedevaluationStudiesevaluatedeffectivenessdesignedimproveproblematicreportedoutcomesinterventionsadherencebehavioursusingstandardisedpublishedsince2000RESULTS:EightmetinclusioncriteriaFourchartreviewstwosingle-participantreportsdescribedseriesemployedcross-sectionalNoneexperimentalCONCLUSION:limitednumberhighlightsrelativepaucityworkseekpotentialbarriersobstaclesconductinggambling:Kingdom-basedGamblingScoping

Similar Articles

Cited By