An anoikis-related lncRNA signature may predict the prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity in esophageal cancer.

Fan Feng, Yuxin Chu, Yi Yao, Bin Xu, Qibin Song
Author Information
  1. Fan Feng: Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, PR China.
  2. Yuxin Chu: Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, PR China.
  3. Yi Yao: Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, PR China.
  4. Bin Xu: Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, PR China.
  5. Qibin Song: Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, PR China.

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a prevalent malignancy with heterogeneous outcomes. This study explores the significance of anoikis-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in EC, aiming to unravel their molecular roles and clinical implications.
Methods: Transcriptome and clinical data were obtained from TCGA database for EC samples. We identified anoikis-related genes and lncRNAs by Pearson correlation analysis. The risk score model hinged on prognostic lncRNAs filtered from multiple steps. Risk scores were calculated using the derived formula, and categorized patients into low- and high-risk groups. Model robustness was assessed through Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, with clinical utility achieved via a constructed nomogram. We also explored the interplay between the risk score and immune cell infiltration, and investigated drug sensitivity.
Results: We identified 2365 anoikis-related lncRNAs through co-expression analysis, including 1415 significant lncRNAs differentially expressed between normal and tumor samples. A risk score model was constructed from ten prognostic lncRNAs. The risk score model effectively stratified patients based on the median score, and its predictive capacity was validated through KM survival, ROC curve analyses, and the external GSE53622 dataset. The nomogram provided a practical tool for individualized prognosis evaluation. We unveiled significant correlations between specific immune cell subsets and the risk score. Eosinophils and common lymphoid progenitors exhibited positive associations, while endothelial cells and myeloid dendritic cells showed negative correlations. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed potential sensitive drugs for EC treatment that aligned with the risk subgroups.
Conclusion: This study established an anoikis-related lncRNAs risk score model that may predict the prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity in EC, in hope of facilitating tailored patient management.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 25;13(1):13919 [PMID: 37626132]
  2. World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul 28;20(1):242 [PMID: 35897018]
  3. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 29;13(1):14122 [PMID: 37644077]
  4. J Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;2022:8179208 [PMID: 36545127]
  5. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):15069-15083 [PMID: 37620430]
  6. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953 [PMID: 30350310]
  7. Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Aug 4;15(15):7655-7672 [PMID: 37543428]
  8. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 12;150(2):91 [PMID: 38347320]
  9. Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Aug 24;15(16):8384-8407 [PMID: 37632832]
  10. Heliyon. 2023 Aug 09;9(8):e19035 [PMID: 37636385]
  11. Front Genet. 2022 Mar 07;13:786689 [PMID: 35330729]
  12. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 18;24(16): [PMID: 37629096]
  13. Oncol Lett. 2023 Jul 04;26(2):356 [PMID: 37545626]
  14. Am J Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 15;13(7):2790-2813 [PMID: 37559999]
  15. Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 01;109(8):2451-2466 [PMID: 37463039]
  16. Brief Bioinform. 2021 Nov 5;22(6): [PMID: 34260682]
  17. Oncol Res. 2023 Jul 21;31(5):715-752 [PMID: 37547764]
  18. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2251500 [PMID: 37643369]
  19. Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jan;14(3):320-330 [PMID: 36507553]
  20. Stem Cells Int. 2023 May 9;2023:2490943 [PMID: 37200633]
  21. IET Syst Biol. 2023 Aug;17(4):198-211 [PMID: 37417684]
  22. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 30;18(8):e0287724 [PMID: 37647290]
  23. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Aug 28;18(1):47 [PMID: 37641095]
  24. Biosci Rep. 2021 May 28;41(5): [PMID: 33960364]
  25. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 14;32:100700 [PMID: 37635924]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lncRNAsriskscoreECanoikis-relatedanalysismodelimmunesensitivitycancerclinicalinfiltrationdrugprognosisEsophagealstudysamplesidentifiedprognosticpatientsKMsurvivalROCcurveconstructednomogramcellsignificantcorrelationscellsmaypredictlncRNABackground:prevalentmalignancyheterogeneousoutcomesexploressignificancelongnon-codingRNAsaimingunravelmolecularrolesimplicationsMethods:TranscriptomedataobtainedTCGAdatabasegenesPearsoncorrelationhingedfilteredmultiplestepsRiskscorescalculatedusingderivedformulacategorizedlow-high-riskgroupsModelrobustnessassessedKaplan-MeierReceiverOperatingCharacteristicutilityachievedviaalsoexploredinterplayinvestigatedResults:2365co-expressionincluding1415differentiallyexpressednormaltumorteneffectivelystratifiedbasedmedianpredictivecapacityvalidatedanalysesexternalGSE53622datasetprovidedpracticaltoolindividualizedevaluationunveiledspecificsubsetsEosinophilscommonlymphoidprogenitorsexhibitedpositiveassociationsendothelialmyeloiddendriticshowednegativeDrugrevealedpotentialsensitivedrugstreatmentalignedsubgroupsConclusion:establishedhopefacilitatingtailoredpatientmanagementsignatureesophagealAnoikisSurvival

Similar Articles

Cited By