Impact of internal identity asymmetry on employee's behaviors and feelings: A mediating role of psychological distress.

Rida Batool, Qingfeng Tian, Erhua Zhou, Najmul Hasan
Author Information
  1. Rida Batool: School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
  2. Qingfeng Tian: School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
  3. Erhua Zhou: School of Management, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.
  4. Najmul Hasan: BRAC Business School, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Abstract

Individuals may experience internal identity asymmetry when they feel misidentified and believe their colleagues do not recognize their work-related identities. This research examines the impact of internal identity asymmetry on their behavior and emotional outcomes at the workplace in Pakistan. Data was collected through a survey and received responses from 393 participants at different levels of management in various sectors of Pakistan. A partial least square-based structural equation modeling technique has been used to validate the proposed research model and develop hypotheses. The findings indicate that psychological distress has a positive indirect effect on both outcomes, such as individual work performance and well-being during personal and professional base asymmetries time. The result indicates that employees face psychological distress while experiencing internal identity asymmetries, which may decrease the performance and well-being of the employees. Findings highlight the importance of coping strategies in improving the performance and well-being of employees. Managers can be supportive in maintaining a positive workplace environment where individuals can have a more accurate self-perception and a better understanding of their colleagues' perspectives. This, in turn, enables them to adopt appropriate coping strategies to enhance both performance and well-being

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 2009 May;94(3):727-41 [PMID: 19450009]
  2. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:161-86 [PMID: 11752483]
  3. Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 21;45:e1 [PMID: 33342451]
  4. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Mar;41(3):363-78 [PMID: 25575872]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Aug;79(2):238-50 [PMID: 10948977]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1987 Jul;94(3):319-40 [PMID: 3615707]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):992-1003 [PMID: 3712234]
  8. J Appl Meas. 2014;15(2):160-75 [PMID: 24950534]
  9. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 May;31(5):703-13 [PMID: 15802664]
  10. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Mar;24(2-3):114-122 [PMID: 28233374]
  11. Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;49(Pt 1):43-67 [PMID: 19220934]
  12. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100 [PMID: 16250744]
  13. J Appl Psychol. 2016 Nov;101(11):1569-1584 [PMID: 27504657]
  14. Work. 2014;48(2):229-38 [PMID: 23803443]
  15. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152-8 [PMID: 18763695]
  16. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1189-99 [PMID: 17845079]
  17. J Health Psychol. 1997 Jul;2(3):335-51 [PMID: 22013026]
  18. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Dec;14(4):739-51 [PMID: 16256371]
  19. Psychol Bull. 1982 Nov;92(3):641-669 [PMID: 7156261]
  20. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):195 [PMID: 37192948]
  21. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):219-30 [PMID: 10784286]
  22. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Oct;14(10):1161-9 [PMID: 22367977]
  23. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:451-74 [PMID: 18976113]
  24. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  25. Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102945 [PMID: 31491722]
  26. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 05;8(11):e78433 [PMID: 24223805]
  27. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Jan;48(1):150-70 [PMID: 2980281]
  28. Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Jul-Aug;85(7-8):92-100, 192 [PMID: 17642128]
  29. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Apr;30(4):487-500 [PMID: 15070477]
  30. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 [PMID: 12214795]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0identityinternalasymmetrydistressperformancepsychologicalwell-beingemployeesstrategiesmayresearchoutcomesworkplacePakistanpositiveasymmetriescopingcanIndividualsexperiencefeelmisidentifiedbelievecolleaguesrecognizework-relatedidentitiesexaminesimpactbehavioremotionalDatacollectedsurveyreceivedresponses393participantsdifferentlevelsmanagementvarioussectorspartialleastsquare-basedstructuralequationmodelingtechniqueusedvalidateproposedmodeldevelophypothesesfindingsindicateindirecteffectindividualworkpersonalprofessionalbasetimeresultindicatesfaceexperiencingdecreaseFindingshighlightimportanceimprovingManagerssupportivemaintainingenvironmentindividualsaccurateself-perceptionbetterunderstandingcolleagues'perspectivesturnenablesadoptappropriateenhancewell-beingImpactemployee'sbehaviorsfeelings:mediatingroleBehaviorCopingFeelingsInternalPsychological

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.