Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of drug-metabolizing enzyme genes.

Wei Mao, Tao Zhou, Feng Zhang, Maoxiang Qian, Jianqiang Xie, Zhengyan Li, Yang Shu, Yuan Li, Heng Xu
Author Information
  1. Wei Mao: Department of Laboratory Medicine/Research Centre of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan.
  2. Tao Zhou: Department of Laboratory Medicine/Research Centre of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan.
  3. Feng Zhang: Center for Precision Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang.
  4. Maoxiang Qian: Institute of Pediatrics and Department of Hematology and Oncology, National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai.
  5. Jianqiang Xie: Department of Medicine and Surgery, Sichan Second Veterans Hospital.
  6. Zhengyan Li: Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
  7. Yang Shu: Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
  8. Yuan Li: Institute of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  9. Heng Xu: Department of Laboratory Medicine/Research Centre of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Varied expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes (DME) genes dictates the intensity and duration of drug response in cancer treatment. This study aimed to investigate the transcriptional profile of DMEs in tumor microenvironment (TME) at single-cell level and their impact on individual responses to anticancer therapy.
METHODS: Over 1.3 million cells from 481 normal/tumor samples across 9 solid cancer types were integrated to profile changes in the expression of DME genes. A ridge regression model based on the PRISM database was constructed to predict the influence of DME gene expression on drug sensitivity.
RESULTS: Distinct expression patterns of DME genes were revealed at single-cell resolution across different cancer types. Several DME genes were highly enriched in epithelial cells (e.g. GPX2, TST and CYP3A5 ) or different TME components (e.g. CYP4F3 in monocytes). Particularly, GPX2 and TST were differentially expressed in epithelial cells from tumor samples compared to those from normal samples. Utilizing the PRISM database, we found that elevated expression of GPX2, CYP3A5 and reduced expression of TST was linked to enhanced sensitivity of particular chemo-drugs (e.g. gemcitabine, daunorubicin, dasatinib, vincristine, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin).
CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the varied expression pattern of DME genes in cancer cells and TME components, highlighting their potential as biomarkers for selecting appropriate chemotherapy agents.

References

  1. Wheeler AM, Eberhard CD, Mosher EP, Yuan Y, Wilkins HN, Seneviratne HK, et al. Achieving a deeper understanding of drug metabolism and responses using single-cell technologies. Drug Metab Dispos 2023; 51:350���359.
  2. Zhou J, Poloyac SM. The effect of therapeutic hypothermia on drug metabolism and response: cellular mechanisms to organ function. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2011; 7:803���816.
  3. Yin J, Li F, Zhou Y, Mou M, Lu Y, Chen K, et al. INTEDE: interactome of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 49:D1233���D1243.
  4. Khan A, Jahego AR, Chapter 4 - Emerging environmental contaminants and drug-metabolizing enzymes. In: Hamid Akash MS, Rehman K, editors. Biochemistry of drug metabolizing enzymes. Academic Press; 2022. pp. 109���124.
  5. Justenhoven C. Polymorphisms of phase I and phase II enzymes and breast cancer risk. Front Genet 2012; 3:258.
  6. Zhao M, et al. Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Drug Metabolism in Humans. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:12808.
  7. Finkelmann AR, Goldmann D, Schneider G, G��ller AH. MetScore: site of metabolism prediction beyond cytochrome P450 enzymes. ChemMedChem 2018; 13:2281���2289.
  8. Jancova P, Anzenbacher P, Anzenbacherova E. Phase II drug metabolizing enzymes. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2010; 154:103���116.
  9. Ceban F, Subramaniapillai M, Rosenblat JD, Mansur RB, McIntyre RS. Can COVID-19 have a clinically significant effect on drug metabolism? Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:1���3.
  10. Swinney R, Hsu S, Tomlinson G. Phase I and Phase II enzyme polymorphisms and childhood cancer. J Investig Med 2006; 54:303���320.
  11. Gagliardi A, Bajraktari-Sylejmani G, Barocelli E, Weiss J, Rigalli JP. Extracellular vesicles as surrogates for drug metabolism and clearance: promise vs. reality. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1745.
  12. Satsu H. Regulation of detoxification enzymes by food components in intestinal epithelial cells. Food Sci Technol Res 2019; 25:149���156.
  13. Speer JE, Wang Y, Fallon JK, Smith PC, Allbritton NL. Evaluation of human primary intestinal monolayers for drug metabolizing capabilities. J Biol Eng 2019; 13:82.
  14. da Rocha JEB, Othman H, Botha G, Cottino L, Twesigomwe D, Ahmed S, et al. The Extent and Impact of Variation in ADME Genes in Sub-Saharan African Populations. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:634016.
  15. Goetz MP, Sangkuhl K, Guchelaar H-J, Schwab M, Province M, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and Tamoxifen Therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 103:770���777.
  16. Kabbani D, Akika R, Wahid A, Daly AK, Cascorbi I, Zgheib NK. Pharmacogenomics in practice: a review and implementation guide. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1189976.
  17. Loisios-Konstantinidis I, Paraiso RLM, Fotaki N, McAllister M, Cristofoletti R, Dressman J. Application of the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development and therapeutic equivalence: a PEARRL review. J Pharm Pharmacol 2019; 71:699���723.
  18. Kansaku F, Kumai T, Sasaki K, Yokozuka M, Shimizu M, Tateda T, et al. Individual differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic agent propofol with regard to CYP2B6 and UGT1A9 genotype and patient age. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2011; 26:532���537.
  19. Rehman K, Iqbal Z, Zhiqin D, Ayub H, Saba N, Khan MA, et al. Analysis of genetic biomarkers, polymorphisms in ADME-related genes and their impact on pharmacotherapy for prostate cancer. Cancer Cell Int 2023; 23:247.
  20. Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B, et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:38022���38043.
  21. Fr��hlich H, Balling R, Beerenwinkel N, Kohlbacher O, Kumar S, Lengauer T, et al. From hype to reality: data science enabling personalized medicine. BMC Med 2018; 16:150.
  22. Hoeben A, Joosten EAJ, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ. Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:242.
  23. Selvakumar SC, Preethi KA, Ross K, Tusubira D, Khan MWA, Mani P, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 and next generation sequencing in the personalized treatment of Cancer. Mol Cancer 2022; 21:83.
  24. Lagan�� A. Computational Approaches for the Investigation of Intra-tumor Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution from Bulk Sequencing Data in Precision Oncology Applications. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022; 1361:101���118.
  25. Jackson HW, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Ali HR, Mechera R, Soysal SD, et al. The single-cell pathology landscape of breast cancer. Nature 2020; 578:615���620.
  26. Li Y, Umbach DM, Krahn JM, Shats I, Li X, Li L. Predicting tumor response to drugs based on gene-expression biomarkers of sensitivity learned from cancer cell lines. BMC Genomics 2021; 22:272.
  27. Tang F, Li J, Qi L, Liu D, Bo Y, Qin S, et al. A pan-cancer single-cell panorama of human natural killer cells. Cell 2023; 186:4235���4251.e20.
  28. Zheng L, Qin S, Si W, Wang A, Xing B, Gao R, et al. Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cells. Science 2021; 374:abe6474.
  29. Luo H, Xia X, Huang L-B, An H, Cao M, Kim GD, et al. Pan-cancer single-cell analysis reveals the heterogeneity and plasticity of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6619.
  30. Yin D, Zhou T, Xia X, Han C, Liu Z, Li Q, et al. Novel insights into HBV-hepatocellular carcinoma at single-cell sequencing. MedComm���Oncology 2023; 2:e60.
  31. Alffenaar JC, de Steenwinkel JEM, Diacon AH, Simonsson USH, Srivastava S, Wicha SG. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-tuberculosis drugs: An evaluation of in vitro, in vivo methodologies and human studies. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1063453.
  32. Antognelli C, Mearini L, Talesa VN, Giannantoni A, Mearini E. Association of CYP17, GSTP1, and PON1 polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate 2005; 63:240���251.
  33. Williams JA, Phillips DH. Mammary expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and their potential role in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2000; 60:4667���4677.
  34. Hu C, Chen W, Li F, Zhang Y, Yu P, Yang L, et al. Deep learning radio-clinical signatures for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis from pretreatment CT images of locally advanced gastric cancer patients. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1980���1992.
  35. Zheng Q, Zhao J, Yu H, Zong H, He X, Zhao Y, et al. Tumor-Specific Transcripts Are Frequently Expressed in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Clinical Implication and Potential Function. Hepatology 2020; 71:259���274.
  36. Yang C, et al. Prognosis and personalized treatment prediction in TP53-mutant hepatocellular carcinoma: an in silico strategy towards precision oncology. Brief Bioinform 2021; 22:bbaa164.
  37. S��ez GT, Est��n-Capell N. In: Schwab M, editor. Antioxidant enzymes, in encyclopedia of cancer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. pp. 288���294.
  38. Zhang M-L, Wu H-T, Chen W-J, Xu Y, Ye Q-Q, Shen J-X, et al. Involvement of glutathione peroxidases in the occurrence and development of breast cancers. J Transl Med 2020; 18:247.
  39. Yi L, Dratter J, Wang C, Tunge JA, Desaire H. Identification of sulfation sites of metabolites and prediction of the compounds��� biological effects. Anal Bioanal Chem 2006; 386:666���674.
  40. Skaria T, Bachli E, Schoedon G. Transcriptional Regulation of Drug Metabolizing CYP Enzymes by Proinflammatory Wnt5A Signaling in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:619588.
  41. Lou W, Ding B, Wang S, Fu P. Overexpression of GPX3, a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer, inhibits progression of breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Cell Int 2020; 20:378.
  42. Yang XM, Ye P-P, Liu X-L, Guo Z-X, Kan M, Li Q, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of apatinib in adult cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:1862���1872.
  43. Ozeki T, Nagahama M, Fujita K, Suzuki A, Sugino K, Ito K, et al. Influence of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms on lenvatinib plasma trough concentrations in Japanese patients with thyroid cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:5404.
  44. Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol 2017; 18:83.
  45. Shin SH, Bode AM, Dong Z. Precision medicine: the foundation of future cancer therapeutics. NPJ Precis Oncol 2017; 1:12.
  46. Bao H, Min Li, Bu F, Wang S, Meng J. Recent advances of liquid biopsy: Interdisciplinary strategies toward clinical decision-making. Interdiscip. Med 2023; 1:e20230021.

MeSH Term

Humans
Neoplasms
Tumor Microenvironment
Antineoplastic Agents
Single-Cell Analysis
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic

Chemicals

Antineoplastic Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0expressionDMEgenescancercellsTMEsingle-cellsamplesegGPX2TSTdrug-metabolizingdrugprofiletumoracrosstypesPRISMdatabasesensitivitydifferentepithelialCYP3A5componentsOBJECTIVE:VariedenzymesdictatesintensitydurationresponsetreatmentstudyaimedinvestigatetranscriptionalDMEsmicroenvironmentlevelimpactindividualresponsesanticancertherapyMETHODS:13million481normal/tumor9solidintegratedchangesridgeregressionmodelbasedconstructedpredictinfluencegeneRESULTS:DistinctpatternsrevealedresolutionSeveralhighlyenrichedCYP4F3monocytesParticularlydifferentiallyexpressedcomparednormalUtilizingfoundelevatedreducedlinkedenhancedparticularchemo-drugsgemcitabinedaunorubicindasatinibvincristinepaclitaxeloxaliplatinCONCLUSION:findingsunderscorevariedpatternhighlightingpotentialbiomarkersselectingappropriatechemotherapyagentsPan-cancerlandscapeenzyme

Similar Articles

Cited By