Pathways linking workplace violence and suicidal ideation/non-suicidal self-injury among nurse staff: the mediating role of loneliness and depressive symptoms.

Changmian Ding, Zhizhou Duan, Wenqun Luo, Lidan Li, Guizhi Li, Xuehua Li, Linli Xie, Rongrong Yang
Author Information
  1. Changmian Ding: The Medical Record Management Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.
  2. Zhizhou Duan: Preventive health service, Jiangxi provincial people's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Preventive health service, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. 2013302170005@whu.edu.cn.
  3. Wenqun Luo: Department of Gynecology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
  4. Lidan Li: The Nursing Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.
  5. Guizhi Li: The Medical Record Management Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.
  6. Xuehua Li: The Medical Record Management Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.
  7. Linli Xie: The Nursing Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.
  8. Rongrong Yang: Emergency Department, The People's Hospital of Dehong, Yunnan, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses face disproportionately high rates of suicidal ideation and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The role of workplace violence, loneliness, and depressive symptoms in exacerbating these issues is poorly understood. This study aims to explore these relationships to inform interventions for improving nurses' mental health.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 1,774 Chinese nurse staff selected through convenient sampling methods was conducted. Workplace violence, depressive symptoms, and loneliness were assessed using the Chinese versions of the Workplace Violence Scale (WVS), the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and a three-item loneliness scale, respectively. Participants completed self-report questionnaires anonymously to ensure adherence to ethical standards. Statistical analysis utilized structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the intricate relationships among variables, thereby elucidating the impact of workplace violence, loneliness, and depressive symptoms on nurses' suicidal ideation/NSSI outcomes.
RESULTS: Nurse staff 165 (7.8%) were reported different level of suicidal ideation and 139 (7.8%) participants were reported different level of NSSI. And the final model of workplace violence on suicidal ideation shown a good model fit index (CMIN/DF = 3.482 NFI = 0.969 CFI = 0.977 TLI = 0.955 RFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.037 SRMR = 0.035). The pathway of workplace violence to loneliness (β = 0.163, P < 0.001), the indirect effect of workplace violence on suicidal ideation via loneliness and depressive symptoms were 0.100 (95%CI = 0.085, 0.121), the indirect effect of loneliness on suicidal ideation via depressive symptoms were 0.128 (95%CI = 0.100, 0.158). Similarly, the final model of workplace violence on NSSI shown a good model fit index (CMIN/DF = 3.482 NFI = 0.967 CFI = 0.976 TLI = 0.953 RFI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.037 SRMR = 0.034), the pathways of workplace violence to NSSI (β = 0.115, P < 0.001), the indirect effect of workplace violence on NSSI via loneliness and depressive symptoms were 0.075 (95%CI = 0.055, 0.096), the indirect effect of loneliness on NSSI via depressive symptoms were 0.102 (95%CI = 0.076, 0.130).
CONCLUSION: Our study unveils the role of workplace violence in nurses' suicidal ideation and NSSI, mediated by loneliness and depressive symptoms. Interventions targeting workplace violence are crucial for nurses' well-being, potentially reducing loneliness and depressive symptoms and lowering the risk of suicidal ideation and NSSI. However, further research is needed to explore additional mediators and pathways, employing longitudinal designs to establish causality and develop tailored interventions for nurses affected by workplace violence.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;5(2):167-174 [PMID: 29246453]
  2. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 May-Jun;46(3):437-449 [PMID: 25864500]
  3. Crisis. 2021 Mar;42(2):152-156 [PMID: 32431200]
  4. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):48-57 [PMID: 33181096]
  5. J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):320-6 [PMID: 21676470]
  6. BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 30;13(6):e069576 [PMID: 37399442]
  7. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:156-67 [PMID: 26416295]
  8. Psychiatry Res. 2021 Aug;302:113992 [PMID: 34044201]
  9. J Sch Psychol. 2018 Apr;67:1-15 [PMID: 29571526]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 15;14(7): [PMID: 28714893]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 20;18(10): [PMID: 34065364]
  12. J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Aug;42(8):1234-42 [PMID: 23371004]
  13. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Feb 19;14:199-206 [PMID: 33642883]
  14. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Sep;30(3):687-696 [PMID: 36272037]
  15. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 15;331:393-404 [PMID: 36933670]
  16. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672 [PMID: 18504506]
  17. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jan;51(1):106-113 [PMID: 30466180]
  18. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013 Jun;45(2):169-76 [PMID: 23470274]
  19. J Psychol. 2012 Jan-Apr;146(1-2):85-104 [PMID: 22303614]
  20. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Nov;201(11):987-90 [PMID: 24177487]
  21. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e031513 [PMID: 31542763]
  22. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;22(2):95-102 [PMID: 23053774]
  23. Nurs Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;55(5):308-15 [PMID: 16980831]
  24. J Nurs Res. 2023 Feb 01;31(1):e255 [PMID: 36469007]
  25. Psychol Med. 2003 Apr;33(3):395-405 [PMID: 12701661]
  26. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2015;49(4):296-308 [PMID: 26060259]
  27. Int J Public Health. 2015 Feb;60(2):227-37 [PMID: 25588814]
  28. Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:947948 [PMID: 36312085]
  29. Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(9):4022-4031 [PMID: 35586906]
  30. Crisis. 2021 Mar;42(2):144-151 [PMID: 32672524]
  31. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Sep;72(9):2124-37 [PMID: 27121340]
  32. J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:600-607 [PMID: 32871691]
  33. J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):425-432 [PMID: 28880395]
  34. Cogn Emot. 2022 May;36(3):512-526 [PMID: 35077324]
  35. JAMA. 2016 Dec 6;316(21):2214-2236 [PMID: 27923088]
  36. Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:93-102 [PMID: 25444078]
  37. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e102145 [PMID: 25076490]
  38. Struct Equ Modeling. 2020;27(2):318-329 [PMID: 32774078]
  39. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 10;9:807006 [PMID: 35223904]
  40. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;64(5):427-435 [PMID: 29792097]
  41. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2006 Jul;35(4):472-4 [PMID: 16986527]
  42. Eur Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;29(8):503-8 [PMID: 24725924]
  43. Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;10:857472 [PMID: 35910907]
  44. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Oct 19;73Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e20200352 [PMID: 33084840]
  45. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235448 [PMID: 32634150]
  46. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Apr;72(4):836-48 [PMID: 26711369]
  47. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  48. Psychother Psychosom. 1991;55(2-4):90-9 [PMID: 1891573]
  49. Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Jul;34(7):657-669 [PMID: 33849675]
  50. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17285 [PMID: 36241694]
  51. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976 [PMID: 32202646]
  52. Am Psychol. 2015 May-Jun;70(4):344-53 [PMID: 25961315]
  53. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S75-9 [PMID: 23202887]
  54. BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 26;22(1):242 [PMID: 37495998]
  55. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Mar;42(1):13-22 [PMID: 20487182]
  56. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  57. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;26(6):695-718 [PMID: 16952717]
  58. J Clin Psychol. 2024 Feb;80(2):279-290 [PMID: 37847787]
  59. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):1347-55 [PMID: 25777684]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0violenceworkplacelonelinessdepressivesymptomssuicidalideationNSSI0nurses'modelindirecteffectvia95%CI = 0self-injuryrolestudyWorkplaceexplorerelationshipsinterventionsChinesenursestaffamongNurse78%reporteddifferentlevelfinalshowngoodfitindexCMIN/DF = 3482NFI = 0CFI = 0TLI = 0RFI = 0RMSEA = 0037SRMR = 0β = 0P < 0001100pathwaysBACKGROUND:Nursesfacedisproportionatelyhighratesnon-suicidalexacerbatingissuespoorlyunderstoodaimsinformimprovingmentalhealthMETHODS:cross-sectionalinvolving1774selectedconvenientsamplingmethodsconductedassessedusingversionsViolenceScaleWVS9-itemPatientHealthQuestionnairePHQ-9three-itemscalerespectivelyParticipantscompletedself-reportquestionnairesanonymouslyensureadherenceethicalstandardsStatisticalanalysisutilizedstructuralequationmodelingSEMexamineintricatevariablestherebyelucidatingimpactideation/NSSIoutcomesRESULTS:165139participants969977955938035pathway163085121128158Similarly967976953935034115075055096102076130CONCLUSION:unveilsmediatedInterventionstargetingcrucialwell-beingpotentiallyreducingloweringriskHoweverresearchneededadditionalmediatorsemployinglongitudinaldesignsestablishcausalitydeveloptailorednursesaffectedPathwayslinkingideation/non-suicidalstaff:mediatingLonelinessNon-suicidalSuicidal

Similar Articles

Cited By