Genomic investigation and clinical correlates of the ��-lactam: NaHCO responsiveness phenotype among methicillin-resistant isolates from a randomized clinical trial.

Neta Petersiel, Stefano Giulieri, Diane S Daniel, Sook-Ha Fan, Selvi C Ersoy, Joshua S Davis, Arnold S Bayer, Benjamin P Howden, Steven Y C Tong, CAMERA2 study group
Author Information
  1. Neta Petersiel: Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. ORCID
  2. Stefano Giulieri: Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. ORCID
  3. Diane S Daniel: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  4. Sook-Ha Fan: The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Torrance, California, USA.
  5. Selvi C Ersoy: The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Torrance, California, USA. ORCID
  6. Joshua S Davis: Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. ORCID
  7. Arnold S Bayer: The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Torrance, California, USA.
  8. Benjamin P Howden: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  9. Steven Y C Tong: Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

NaHCO responsiveness is a novel phenotype where some methicillin-resistant (MRSA) isolates exhibit significantly lower minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to oxacillin and/or cefazolin in the presence of NaHCO. NaHCO responsiveness correlated with treatment response to ��-lactams in an endocarditis animal model. We investigated whether treatment of NaHCO-responsive strains with ��-lactams was associated with faster clearance of bacteremia. The CAMERA2 trial (Combination Antibiotics for Methicillin-Resistant ) randomly assigned participants with MRSA bloodstream infections to standard therapy, or to standard therapy plus an anti-staphylococcal ��-lactam (combination therapy). For 117 CAMERA2 MRSA isolates, we determined by broth microdilution the MIC of cefazolin and oxacillin, with and without 44 mM of NaHCO. Isolates exhibiting ���4-fold decrease in the MIC to cefazolin or oxacillin in the presence of NaHCO were considered "NaHCO-responsive" to that agent. We compared the rate of persistent bacteremia among participants who had infections caused by NaHCO-responsive and non-responsive strains, and that were assigned to combination treatment with a ��-lactam. Thirty-one percent (36/117) and 25% (21/85) of MRSA isolates were NaHCO-responsive to cefazolin and oxacillin, respectively. The NaHCO-responsive phenotype was significantly associated with sequence type 93, SCC type IVa, and alleles with substitutions in positions -7 and -38 in the regulatory region. Among participants treated with a ��-lactam, there was no association between the NaHCO-responsive phenotype and persistent bacteremia (cefazolin, = 0.82; oxacillin, = 0.81). In patients from a randomized clinical trial with MRSA bloodstream infection, isolates with an ��-lactam-NaHCO-responsive phenotype were associated with distinctive genetic signatures, but not with a shorter duration of bacteremia among those treated with a ��-lactam.

Keywords

References

  1. Genes (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;12(11): [PMID: 34828256]
  2. J Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;179(8):2557-66 [PMID: 9098053]
  3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Mar 1;65(5): [PMID: 33649115]
  4. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 9;10(1):16907 [PMID: 33037239]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 1;61(3):361-7 [PMID: 25900170]
  6. JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):527-537 [PMID: 32044943]
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7): [PMID: 31010857]
  8. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):157-164 [PMID: 29986019]
  9. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;42(9):1125-1133 [PMID: 37515660]
  10. Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Sep 09;8:688357 [PMID: 34646861]
  11. Cell Rep. 2023 Sep 26;42(9):113069 [PMID: 37703880]
  12. Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 4;14(1):60 [PMID: 36599823]
  13. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):217-9 [PMID: 19020073]
  14. Microb Genom. 2021 Sep;7(9): [PMID: 34554083]
  15. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 09;10(9): [PMID: 34572671]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 29;75(9):1668-1674 [PMID: 35535790]
  17. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Mar 08;68(9):214-219 [PMID: 30845118]
  18. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43037 [PMID: 22900085]
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4012-8 [PMID: 21709105]
  20. Microb Genom. 2021 Apr;7(4): [PMID: 33843577]
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Aug;54(8):3161-9 [PMID: 20547804]
  22. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Aug;48(8):3080-5 [PMID: 15273123]
  23. PeerJ. 2018 Jul 12;6:e5261 [PMID: 30013858]
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):193-200 [PMID: 18171250]
  25. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008 Oct;298(7-8):607-17 [PMID: 18456552]
  26. mBio. 2018 Apr 3;9(2): [PMID: 29615500]
  27. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Dec 1;35(12):3041-3043 [PMID: 30351396]
  28. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;11(4): [PMID: 35453214]
  29. EBioMedicine. 2017 Jun;20:173-181 [PMID: 28579300]
  30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Feb 21;64(3): [PMID: 31844004]
  31. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jun 21;66(6):e0025222 [PMID: 35575577]
  32. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1047-54 [PMID: 24277044]
  33. Nat Microbiol. 2019 Oct;4(10):1680-1691 [PMID: 31235959]
  34. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0342222 [PMID: 36377886]
  35. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5): [PMID: 32041719]
  36. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;36(1):3-16 [PMID: 25643267]
  37. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1409-1417 [PMID: 32763194]
  38. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7 [PMID: 15034147]
  39. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 1;52(3):e18-55 [PMID: 21208910]

Grants

  1. R01 AI146078/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. 0001-001094/MOH | National Medical Research Council (NMRC)
  3. 1078930/DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  4. 1RO1AI146078/HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

MeSH Term

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Humans
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cefazolin
Staphylococcal Infections
Oxacillin
Bacteremia
Phenotype
beta-Lactams
Male
Sodium Bicarbonate
Female
Middle Aged

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cefazolin
Oxacillin
beta-Lactams
Sodium Bicarbonate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NaHCOMRSAphenotypeisolatesoxacillincefazolinNaHCO-responsivebacteremia��-lactamresponsivenessmethicillin-resistantMICtreatment��-lactamsassociatedtrialparticipantstherapyamongclinicalsignificantlypresencestrainsCAMERA2assignedbloodstreaminfectionsstandardcombinationpersistenttypetreated=0randomizednovelexhibitlowerminimalinhibitoryconcentrationsand/orcorrelatedresponseendocarditisanimalmodelinvestigatedwhetherfasterclearanceCombinationAntibioticsMethicillin-Resistantrandomlyplusanti-staphylococcal117determinedbrothmicrodilutionwithout44mMIsolatesexhibiting���4-folddecreaseconsidered"NaHCO-responsive"agentcomparedratecausednon-responsiveThirty-onepercent36/11725%21/85respectivelysequence93SCCIVaallelessubstitutionspositions-7-38regulatoryregionAmongassociation8281patientsinfection��-lactam-NaHCO-responsivedistinctivegeneticsignaturesshorterdurationGenomicinvestigationcorrelates��-lactam:bacterialgenomicsbloodstream-infectionsStaphylococcusaureussodiumbicarbonateNaHCO3

Similar Articles

Cited By