Future-proofing genomic data and consent management: a comprehensive review of technology innovations.

Adrien Oliva, Anubhav Kaphle, Roc Reguant, Letitia M F Sng, Natalie A Twine, Yuwan Malakar, Anuradha Wickramarachchi, Marcel Keller, Thilina Ranbaduge, Eva K F Chan, James Breen, Sam Buckberry, Boris Guennewig, Matilda Haas, Alex Brown, Mark J Cowley, Natalie Thorne, Yatish Jain, Denis C Bauer
Author Information
  1. Adrien Oliva: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  2. Anubhav Kaphle: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  3. Roc Reguant: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  4. Letitia M F Sng: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  5. Natalie A Twine: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  6. Yuwan Malakar: Responsible Innovation Future Science Platform, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia. ORCID
  7. Anuradha Wickramarachchi: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  8. Marcel Keller: Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 5/13 Garden St, Eveleigh NSW 2015, Australia. ORCID
  9. Thilina Ranbaduge: Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Building 101, Clunies Ross St, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. ORCID
  10. Eva K F Chan: NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, 1 Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia. ORCID
  11. James Breen: Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ORCID
  12. Sam Buckberry: Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ORCID
  13. Boris Guennewig: Sydney Medical School, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia. ORCID
  14. Matilda Haas: Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. ORCID
  15. Alex Brown: Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ORCID
  16. Mark J Cowley: Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Level 4, Lowy Cancer Research Centre Corner Botany & High Streets UNSW Kensington Campus UNSW Sydney, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia. ORCID
  17. Natalie Thorne: University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia. ORCID
  18. Yatish Jain: Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Level 3/160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia. ORCID
  19. Denis C Bauer: Applied BioSciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Applied BioSciences 205B Culloden Rd Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

Genomic information is increasingly used to inform medical treatments and manage future disease risks. However, any personal and societal gains must be carefully balanced against the risk to individuals contributing their genomic data. Expanding our understanding of actionable genomic insights requires researchers to access large global datasets to capture the complexity of genomic contribution to diseases. Similarly, clinicians need efficient access to a patient's genome as well as population-representative historical records for evidence-based decisions. Both researchers and clinicians hence rely on participants to consent to the use of their genomic data, which in turn requires trust in the professional and ethical handling of this information. Here, we review existing and emerging solutions for secure and effective genomic information management, including storage, encryption, consent, and authorization that are needed to build participant trust. We discuss recent innovations in cloud computing, quantum-computing-proof encryption, and self-sovereign identity. These innovations can augment key developments from within the genomics community, notably GA4GH Passports and the Crypt4GH file container standard. We also explore how decentralized storage as well as the digital consenting process can offer culturally acceptable processes to encourage data contributions from ethnic minorities. We conclude that the individual and their right for self-determination needs to be put at the center of any genomics framework, because only on an individual level can the received benefits be accurately balanced against the risk of exposing private information.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Adv. 2021 Nov 19;7(47):eabg3296 [PMID: 34788101]
  2. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Nov 5;97(5):631-46 [PMID: 26522470]
  3. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Mar 31;17:19 [PMID: 27059184]
  4. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:80-88 [PMID: 32477626]
  5. Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1137-47 [PMID: 24518929]
  6. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:375-93 [PMID: 26905784]
  7. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1391-1397 [PMID: 36064788]
  8. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294 [PMID: 37169978]
  9. Bioinformatics. 2021 Sep 9;37(17):2753-2754 [PMID: 33543751]
  10. Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2): [PMID: 35072136]
  11. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Sep;47(10):1737-1738 [PMID: 35739257]
  12. Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Nov;20(11):693-701 [PMID: 31455890]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4): [PMID: 32059561]
  14. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):649-656 [PMID: 33249421]
  15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Dec;24(12):1676-1680 [PMID: 27677416]
  16. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 May;28(5):609-626 [PMID: 31844175]
  17. J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Sep 17;9(1):24 [PMID: 30223897]
  18. Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):725-732 [PMID: 27763635]
  19. Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(5):687-92 [PMID: 16400377]
  20. BMC Nurs. 2021 Feb 12;20(1):31 [PMID: 33579269]
  21. Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar 1;36(6):1696-1703 [PMID: 31702787]
  22. Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Jun;25(2):269-280 [PMID: 35286521]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11608-11613 [PMID: 32398369]
  24. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):4 [PMID: 28122615]
  25. Genome Med. 2020 Feb 19;12(1):18 [PMID: 32075696]
  26. Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644 [PMID: 29942545]
  27. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 02;19(3): [PMID: 35162742]
  28. Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2304-5 [PMID: 21653516]
  29. JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 3;9(11):e27816 [PMID: 34730538]
  30. Cell Syst. 2016 Jul;3(1):54-61 [PMID: 27453444]
  31. Nat Genet. 2023 Feb;55(2):178-186 [PMID: 36658435]
  32. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:560484 [PMID: 24883407]
  33. Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 05;6:253 [PMID: 30234093]
  34. BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):1380 [PMID: 32912246]
  35. Sci Data. 2022 Oct 28;9(1):659 [PMID: 36307424]
  36. Nat Comput Sci. 2021 Mar;1(3):192-198 [PMID: 38183193]
  37. Nat Genet. 2020 Jul;52(7):646-654 [PMID: 32601475]
  38. Genetics. 2022 Mar 3;220(3): [PMID: 34897427]
  39. Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2):None [PMID: 34820659]
  40. Hum Genet. 2010 Sep;128(3):249-60 [PMID: 20549517]
  41. Front Big Data. 2024 Feb 29;7:1266031 [PMID: 38487517]
  42. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):61-68 [PMID: 37709947]
  43. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 14;3:119 [PMID: 33015372]
  44. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):687-698 [PMID: 33408362]
  45. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 04;20(7): [PMID: 37048008]
  46. BMC Med Genomics. 2017 Jul 26;10(Suppl 2):43 [PMID: 28786364]
  47. Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1122-1130 [PMID: 29446766]
  48. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):506-512 [PMID: 36631540]
  49. Nat Rev Genet. 2016 May 17;17(6):333-51 [PMID: 27184599]
  50. Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2213-33 [PMID: 14704198]
  51. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:361-81 [PMID: 20477535]
  52. Cell Syst. 2022 Feb 16;13(2):173-182.e3 [PMID: 34758288]
  53. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Dec;26(12):1721-1731 [PMID: 30069064]
  54. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  55. Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 5;14(1):5419 [PMID: 37669985]
  56. BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):5 [PMID: 35081954]
  57. Comput Biol Chem. 2021 Aug;93:107538 [PMID: 34246892]
  58. Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 1;35(1):146-148 [PMID: 30020420]
  59. BMC Genomics. 2021 Oct 2;22(1):712 [PMID: 34600465]
  60. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jul;28(7):915-924 [PMID: 32086443]
  61. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 13;8(2): [PMID: 32414183]
  62. Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2270-2280 [PMID: 30072741]
  63. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2022 Aug 10;5:163-181 [PMID: 35508070]
  64. J Healthc Inform Res. 2021;5(1):1-19 [PMID: 33204939]
  65. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):71 [PMID: 31615491]
  66. Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):751-753 [PMID: 28617418]
  67. PLoS Biol. 2014 Nov 04;12(11):e1001983 [PMID: 25369215]
  68. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):203-209 [PMID: 30305743]
  69. Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1742-1753 [PMID: 33020650]
  70. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Feb;28(2):139-140 [PMID: 31527861]
  71. Nat Mach Intell. 2022 Nov;4(11):909-911 [PMID: 36504698]
  72. BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Feb 3;21(1):12 [PMID: 32013947]
  73. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jun;21(6):596-601 [PMID: 23169494]
  74. Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):321-4 [PMID: 23329047]
  75. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10166-10171 [PMID: 28874526]
  76. Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Jan;15(1):6 [PMID: 24501747]
  77. Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):625 [PMID: 29977003]
  78. Science. 2017 Aug 18;357(6352):692-695 [PMID: 28818945]
  79. Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):655-665 [PMID: 35390218]
  80. Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2):None [PMID: 34820660]
  81. PLoS Genet. 2021 Feb 4;17(2):e1009303 [PMID: 33539374]
  82. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 31;20:495-517 [PMID: 30892943]
  83. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Sep 4;14(9):e1006454 [PMID: 30180163]
  84. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 Sep-Oct;15(5):1413-1426 [PMID: 30004884]
  85. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jul 12;29(8):1433-1444 [PMID: 35595301]
  86. Cell. 2022 Jul 21;185(15):2626-2631 [PMID: 35868267]
  87. Hum Mutat. 2022 Jun;43(6):791-799 [PMID: 35297548]
  88. Bioinformatics. 2014 Dec 1;30(23):3334-41 [PMID: 25147357]
  89. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66 [PMID: 27083521]
  90. Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):365-371 [PMID: 30052749]
  91. Med Teach. 2020 Sep;42(9):970-972 [PMID: 32552288]
  92. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;24(4):799-805 [PMID: 28339683]
  93. JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jul 19;10(7):e35724 [PMID: 35852842]
  94. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50 Suppl 1:S54-S61 [PMID: 32597530]

MeSH Term

Humans
Genomics
Computer Security
Cloud Computing
Informed Consent

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genomicdatainformationconsenttrustinnovationscanbalancedriskrequiresresearchersaccesscliniciansgenomewellreviewstorageencryptionself-sovereignidentitygenomicsdecentralizedindividualGenomicincreasinglyusedinformmedicaltreatmentsmanagefuturediseaserisksHoweverpersonalsocietalgainsmustcarefullyindividualscontributingExpandingunderstandingactionableinsightslargeglobaldatasetscapturecomplexitycontributiondiseasesSimilarlyneedefficientpatient'spopulation-representativehistoricalrecordsevidence-baseddecisionshencerelyparticipantsuseturnprofessionalethicalhandlingexistingemergingsolutionssecureeffectivemanagementincludingauthorizationneededbuildparticipantdiscussrecentcloudcomputingquantum-computing-proofaugmentkeydevelopmentswithincommunitynotablyGA4GHPassportsCrypt4GHfilecontainerstandardalsoexploredigitalconsentingprocessofferculturallyacceptableprocessesencouragecontributionsethnicminoritiesconcluderightself-determinationneedsputcenterframeworklevelreceivedbenefitsaccuratelyexposingprivateFuture-proofingmanagement:comprehensivetechnologysystemsdynamicprivacymodel

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)