Preclinical obesity curriculum: audit, implementation, and evaluation.

Amber Olson, Rosanna Watowicz, Eileen Seeholzer, Katherine Lyons, W Scott Butsch, Colleen Croniger
Author Information
  1. Amber Olson: Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. ato8@case.edu.
  2. Rosanna Watowicz: Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  3. Eileen Seeholzer: Adult Weight Loss Surgery & Weight Management Center, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  4. Katherine Lyons: Adult Weight Loss Surgery & Weight Management Center, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  5. W Scott Butsch: Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  6. Colleen Croniger: Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) evaluate the current status of obesity education at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (CWRU) (2), introduce a comprehensive first-year curriculum on obesity, and (3) assess the impact of the curriculum on self-reported attitudes and knowledge regarding obesity among first-year medical students.
METHODS: The preclinical curriculum at CWRU was reviewed to determine the degree of coverage of Obesity Medicine Education Collaborative (OMEC) competencies for healthcare professionals, and recommendations were provided for revising the curriculum to better adhere to these evidence-based competencies. A survey on obesity attitudes and knowledge was given before and after the implementation of the new curriculum to measure intervention-related changes. Changes in obesity attitudes and knowledge were compared (1) before and after the intervention for the class of 2025 and (2) after the intervention for the class of 2025 to a historical cohort that did not receive the intervention.
RESULTS: Among the 27 competencies examined in the audit, 55% were unmet and 41% were partially met. Of 186 first-year medical students (M1s), 29 (16%) completed the baseline survey and 26 (14%) completed the post-intervention survey. Following the intervention, there was a notable improvement in attitudes and knowledge regarding obesity. Specifically, there was a significant decrease in the belief that obesity is caused by poor personal choices, and knowledge of obesity in fourteen out of fifteen areas showed significant improvement from pre- to post-intervention. Additionally, obesity attitudes and knowledge were significantly better post-intervention when compared to the historical cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The improvements made to the preclinical curriculum through this project improved obesity attitudes and knowledge among first-year medical students. This method provides a practical approach for evaluating and enhancing obesity education in medical school curricula.

Keywords

References

  1. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  2. Health Promot Pract. 2017 Sep;18(5):672-680 [PMID: 27402722]
  3. Obes Rev. 2021 Oct;22(10):e13329 [PMID: 34378850]
  4. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):23 [PMID: 31992274]
  5. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0247307 [PMID: 33760880]
  6. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 24;22(1):132 [PMID: 34167487]
  7. Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):282-9 [PMID: 23269296]
  8. MedEdPORTAL. 2023 Dec 1;19:11369 [PMID: 38046813]
  9. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):267-72 [PMID: 22775792]
  10. JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Nov 09;3(2):e22 [PMID: 29122740]

MeSH Term

Humans
Curriculum
Obesity
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Clinical Competence
Students, Medical
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Male
Female
Program Evaluation
Attitude of Health Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0obesityknowledgeattitudescurriculumfirst-yearmedicalinterventioneducationstudentsObesitycompetenciessurveypost-intervention1MedicineCWRU2regardingamongpreclinicalbetterimplementationcomparedclass2025historicalcohortauditcompletedimprovementsignificantBACKGROUND:studyaimedevaluatecurrentstatusCaseWesternReserveUniversitySchoolintroducecomprehensive3assessimpactself-reportedMETHODS:revieweddeterminedegreecoverageEducationCollaborativeOMEChealthcareprofessionalsrecommendationsprovidedrevisingadhereevidence-basedgivennewmeasureintervention-relatedchangesChangesreceiveRESULTS:Among27examined55%unmet41%partiallymet186M1s2916%baseline2614%FollowingnotableSpecificallydecreasebeliefcausedpoorpersonalchoicesfourteenfifteenareasshowedpre-AdditionallysignificantlyCONCLUSIONS:improvementsmadeprojectimprovedmethodprovidespracticalapproachevaluatingenhancingschoolcurriculaPreclinicalcurriculum:evaluationCompetency-basedCurriculumdevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By