Visual analysis of trustworthiness studies: based on the Web of Science database.

Zhen Zhang, Wenqing Deng, Yuxin Wang, Chunhui Qi
Author Information
  1. Zhen Zhang: Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
  2. Wenqing Deng: Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
  3. Yuxin Wang: Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
  4. Chunhui Qi: Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.

Abstract

Trustworthiness is the most significant predictor of trust and has a significant impact on people's levels of trust. Most trustworthiness-related research is empirical, and while it has a long history, it is challenging for academics to get insights that are applicable to their fields of study and to successfully transfer fragmented results into practice. In order to grasp their dynamic development processes through the mapping of network knowledge graphs, this paper is based on the Web of Science database and uses CiteSpace (6.2.R4) software to compile and visualize the 1,463 publications on trustworthy studies over the past 10 years. This paper aims to provide valuable references to theoretical research and the practice of Trustworthiness. The findings demonstrate that: over the past 10 years, trustworthiness-related research has generally increased in volume; trustworthiness research is concentrated in industrialized Europe and America, with American research findings having a bigger global impact; The University of California System, Harvard University, and Yale University are among the high-production institutions; the leading figures are represented by Alexander Todorov, Marco Brambilla, Bastian Jaeger, and others; the core authors are distinguished university scholars; however, the level of cooperation of the core author needs to be improved. The primary journal for publishing research on trustworthiness is the and . In addition, the study focuses on three distinct domains, involving social perception, facial clues, and artificial intelligence.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1325-31 [PMID: 26162847]
  2. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:519-45 [PMID: 25196277]
  3. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:235-245 [PMID: 28258836]
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;30(6):885-897 [PMID: 29393719]
  5. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 31;6(1):23 [PMID: 33788064]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;115(3):468-494 [PMID: 29999336]
  7. Psychol Aging. 2021 Feb;36(1):10-21 [PMID: 33705182]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2118548119 [PMID: 35867823]
  9. Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):128-33 [PMID: 19186926]
  10. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 26;12:742917 [PMID: 34899483]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):39-47 [PMID: 25512052]
  12. Perception. 2017 Aug;46(8):914-928 [PMID: 28152651]
  13. Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412): [PMID: 30337384]
  14. Evol Hum Behav. 2012 Mar 1;33(2):121-129 [PMID: 22611331]
  15. J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103655 [PMID: 33309898]
  16. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(1):24 [PMID: 36852261]
  17. Contemp Nurse. 2015 Oct-Dec;51(2-3):200-19 [PMID: 26909821]
  18. Appl Ergon. 2023 May;109:103967 [PMID: 36736181]
  19. Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 21;14:1203442 [PMID: 37416539]
  20. Neuron. 2012 Dec 20;76(6):1057-70 [PMID: 23259943]
  21. Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jan 28;179:108423 [PMID: 36574534]
  22. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):655-664 [PMID: 27762574]
  23. R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 28;7(10):200685 [PMID: 33204452]
  24. AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1390-428 [PMID: 26421343]
  25. J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):104-18 [PMID: 14769123]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar;124(3):567-592 [PMID: 35816569]
  27. Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):503-18 [PMID: 26493772]
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):208-31 [PMID: 17279846]
  29. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):e0167276 [PMID: 27898705]
  30. Br J Psychol. 2024 Feb;115(1):20-39 [PMID: 37401616]
  31. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jan 23;12:8 [PMID: 29410619]
  32. Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 05;9(1):20120908 [PMID: 23221873]
  33. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):90-98 [PMID: 33678683]
  34. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 07;20(18): [PMID: 32906760]
  35. Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1086392 [PMID: 36998352]
  36. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):21-34 [PMID: 29214437]
  37. Health Inf Manag. 2016 Aug;45(2):80-9 [PMID: 27105476]
  38. Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803 [PMID: 18721917]
  39. Br J Psychol. 2021 May;112(2):474-492 [PMID: 32940352]
  40. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(23):1488-1492 [PMID: 30962182]
  41. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Nov 10;14:514142 [PMID: 33240058]
  42. Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 15;10(1):5184 [PMID: 31729396]
  43. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:627-652 [PMID: 27648986]
  44. Psychol Aging. 2019 Aug;34(5):674-685 [PMID: 31169379]
  45. Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):105-18 [PMID: 23376296]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchtrustworthinessWebScienceUniversityTrustworthinesssignificanttrustimpacttrustworthiness-relatedstudypracticemappingknowledgepaperbaseddatabaseCiteSpacepastfindingscoredomainsanalysispredictorpeople'slevelsempiricallonghistorychallengingacademicsgetinsightsapplicablefieldssuccessfullytransferfragmentedresultsordergraspdynamicdevelopmentprocessesnetworkgraphsuses62R4softwarecompilevisualize1463publicationstrustworthystudies10 yearsaimsprovidevaluablereferencestheoreticaldemonstratethat:10yearsgenerallyincreasedvolumeconcentratedindustrializedEuropeAmericaAmericanbiggerglobalCaliforniaSystemHarvardYaleamonghigh-productioninstitutionsleadingfiguresrepresentedAlexanderTodorovMarcoBrambillaBastianJaegerothersauthorsdistinguisheduniversityscholarshoweverlevelcooperationauthorneedsimprovedprimaryjournalpublishingadditionfocusesthreedistinctinvolvingsocialperceptionfacialcluesartificialintelligenceVisualstudies:visual

Similar Articles

Cited By