The impact of enhanced Milieu teaching with phonological emphasis (EMT + PE) on the speech and language outcomes for toddlers with cleft palate in Brazil and the United States of America.

Natalie R Wombacher, Hope S Lancaster, Nancy J Scherer, Ding-Geng Chen, Ann Kaiser, Renata Yamashita
Author Information
  1. Natalie R Wombacher: Arizona State University, Tempe, USA. ORCID
  2. Hope S Lancaster: Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, USA. ORCID
  3. Nancy J Scherer: Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
  4. Ding-Geng Chen: Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
  5. Ann Kaiser: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA, and.
  6. Renata Yamashita: University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the speech and language outcomes of children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP+/-L) in the USA to children with CP+/-L in Brazil who underwent intervention with enhanced Milieu teaching with phonological emphasis (EMT + PE), as there are few cross-country intervention comparisons for children with CP+/-L.
METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis of 29 participants from the USA and 24 participants from Brazil who were matched on age. The US participants were between the ages of 13-35 months ( = 23.76), spoke Standard American English in the home, and were recruited from East Tennessee State University and Vanderbilt University. The Brazilian participants were between the ages of 20-34 months ( = 25.04), spoke Brazilian Portuguese in the home, and were recruited from the . All treatment participants received EMT + PE from trained speech-language pathologists in hospital-university clinics.
RESULT: The treatment groups demonstrated greater gains than comparison groups in percent consonants correct, number of different words, and expressive/receptive vocabulary. There was no main effect nor interaction by country.
CONCLUSION: The application of EMT + PE in a second culture and language is a viable early intervention option for participants with CP+/-L.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Linguist Phon. 1988;2(2):75-95 [PMID: 21466298]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):759-771 [PMID: 28306754]
  3. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Feb 6;27(1):136-153 [PMID: 29242924]
  4. Codas. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):260-4 [PMID: 25211683]
  5. J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Mar;32(1):12-23 [PMID: 2704186]
  6. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Sep;40(5):460-70 [PMID: 12943443]
  7. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):2155-2169 [PMID: 33181047]
  8. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):226-245 [PMID: 34767284]
  9. Early Child Res Q. 2022 1st Quarter;58:208-219 [PMID: 35058673]
  10. Codas. 2016 Jul-Aug;28(4):379-87 [PMID: 27509396]
  11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Mar 7;66(3):849-862 [PMID: 36787158]
  12. Cleft Palate J. 1988 Jan;25(1):16-20 [PMID: 3422594]
  13. Cleft Palate J. 1988 Apr;25(2):122-34 [PMID: 3163287]
  14. Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 26;8(9): [PMID: 34572168]
  15. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Feb;25(1):167-171 [PMID: 36382791]
  16. Clin Linguist Phon. 2004 Jun-Aug;18(4-5):235-57 [PMID: 15259571]
  17. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Jul;7(1): [PMID: 37460256]
  18. Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Apr;27(4):278-86 [PMID: 23489340]
  19. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):806-818 [PMID: 28586828]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Jun 1;59(3):446-59 [PMID: 27300156]
  21. J Speech Hear Res. 1962 Mar;5:79-90 [PMID: 14476248]
  22. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Jan;32(1):7-13 [PMID: 7727490]
  23. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Feb;55(2):276-286 [PMID: 29351026]
  24. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017 Oct-Dec;35(4):456-463 [PMID: 28977135]
  25. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Jan;40(1):19-31 [PMID: 12498602]
  26. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(3):239-47 [PMID: 23128172]
  27. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Apr;26(2):179-193 [PMID: 37265060]
  28. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):173-82 [PMID: 8331014]
  29. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1546-1571 [PMID: 30177993]
  30. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Aug;45(8):2411-28 [PMID: 25737021]
  31. Codas. 2016 Jul-Aug;28(4):369-72 [PMID: 27556828]
  32. Perspect Speech Sci Orofac Disord. 2015 Jul;25:17-28 [PMID: 27057267]
  33. Clin Linguist Phon. 2022 Jan 2;36(1):34-53 [PMID: 33899624]
  34. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;32(8):2802-2807 [PMID: 34320574]
  35. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3413-3430 [PMID: 31437085]
  36. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003 Apr-May;17(3):173-97 [PMID: 12858838]
  37. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Nov;51(6):622-31 [PMID: 24295442]
  38. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 22;63(1):14-31 [PMID: 31841365]
  39. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Jul;42(3):341-64 [PMID: 20679409]
  40. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994 Nov;31(6):446-51 [PMID: 7833336]
  41. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Jan;45(1):18-31 [PMID: 18215094]
  42. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Oct;22(5):549-558 [PMID: 32164442]
  43. Br J Disord Commun. 1987 Apr;22(1):1-17 [PMID: 3676076]

Grants

  1. R03 DC013527/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R21 DC009654/NIDCD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0participantslanguagecleftCP+/-LinterventionspeechchildrenpalateBrazilEMT + PEoutcomeslipUSAenhancedMilieuteachingphonologicalemphasisagesspokehomerecruitedUniversityBraziliantreatmentgroupsvocabularyearlyPURPOSE:purposestudycomparewithoutunderwentcross-countrycomparisonsMETHOD:retrospectiveanalysis2924matchedageUS13-35 months = 2376StandardAmericanEnglishEastTennesseeStateVanderbilt20-34 months = 2504Portuguesereceivedtrainedspeech-languagepathologistshospital-universityclinicsRESULT:demonstratedgreatergainscomparisonpercentconsonantscorrectnumberdifferentwordsexpressive/receptivemaineffectinteractioncountryCONCLUSION:applicationsecondcultureviableoptionimpactEMT + PEtoddlersUnitedStatesAmericacrosslinguistic

Similar Articles

Cited By