Research circles as a method for implementing new services in the public health and welfare system.

Birthe Møgster, Ottar Ness, Monika Alvestad Reime
Author Information
  1. Birthe Møgster: Department of Welfare and Participation, Western University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway. ORCID
  2. Ottar Ness: Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. ORCID
  3. Monika Alvestad Reime: Department of Welfare and Participation, Western University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Co-creation has become a guiding principle in public service innovation, but more knowledge is still needed on overcoming barriers and increasing the effectiveness of co-creation processes. This study explores the research circle method as a concrete methodology for co-creation, and its application within two cases involving the implementation of new services for drug death-bereaved persons in Norway based on new research-based knowledge.
METHOD: The study followed an action research design. The field notes and audio recordings were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The analysis identified two key dimensions experienced as important for the implementation of the new services when research circles were used as a method for co-creation: 1) the inclusion of participants from different contexts and 2) support structures for service interventions.
DISCUSSION: Research circles are discussed as an important support structure for promoting public value co-creation that can contribute to increasing stakeholders' capacity for implementing services in the public system, especially when the focus is on the perspectives and interests of stakeholders, such as practitioners and management in public health and welfare services. However, the discussion also points to barriers relating to the co-creation process that need to be considered when planning research circle-based interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. Omega (Westport). 2022 Apr 28;:302228221098584 [PMID: 35482973]
  2. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):615-630 [PMID: 35309856]
  3. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Oct;40(5):463-481 [PMID: 37969900]
  4. J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20 [PMID: 22179294]
  5. Omega (Westport). 2023 Oct 18;:302228231206737 [PMID: 37850909]
  6. Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1098-1102 [PMID: 32535625]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;18(21): [PMID: 34769579]
  8. Stress Health. 2022 Apr;38(2):350-363 [PMID: 34448352]
  9. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar;32(3):221-230 [PMID: 33392908]
  10. J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:146-156 [PMID: 32090736]
  11. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24 [PMID: 16557505]

MeSH Term

Humans
Norway
Public Health
Social Welfare
Health Services Research
Qualitative Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0publicco-creationresearchservicesnewcirclesservicemethodinterventionsResearchinnovationknowledgebarriersincreasingstudytwoimplementationactionanalysisimportantsupportcapacityimplementingsystemhealthwelfareBACKGROUND:Co-creationbecomeguidingprinciplestillneededovercomingeffectivenessprocessesexplorescircleconcretemethodologyapplicationwithincasesinvolvingdrugdeath-bereavedpersonsNorwaybasedresearch-basedMETHOD:followeddesignfieldnotesaudiorecordingsanalysedusingreflexivethematicRESULTS:identifiedkeydimensionsexperiencedusedco-creation:1inclusionparticipantsdifferentcontexts2structuresDISCUSSION:discussedstructurepromotingvaluecancontributestakeholders'especiallyfocusperspectivesinterestsstakeholderspractitionersmanagementHoweverdiscussionalsopointsrelatingprocessneedconsideredplanningcircle-basedvalues

Similar Articles

Cited By