Short-Term Memory Capacity Predicts Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort for Reward.

Brandon J Forys, Catharine A Winstanley, Alan Kingstone, Rebecca M Todd
Author Information
  1. Brandon J Forys: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada brandon.forys@psych.ubc.ca. ORCID
  2. Catharine A Winstanley: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. ORCID
  3. Alan Kingstone: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. ORCID
  4. Rebecca M Todd: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

We must often decide whether the effort required for a task is worth the reward. Past rodent work suggests that willingness to deploy cognitive effort can be driven by individual differences in perceived reward value, depression, or chronic stress. However, many factors driving cognitive effort deployment-such as short-term memory ability-cannot easily be captured in rodents. Furthermore, we do not fully understand how individual differences in short-term memory ability, depression, chronic stress, and reward anticipation impact cognitive effort deployment for reward. Here, we examined whether these factors predict cognitive effort deployment for higher reward in an online visual short-term memory task. Undergraduate participants were grouped into high and low effort groups ( ���=���348, ���=���81; ���=���332, ���=���92, ���=���20.37, ���=���16-42) based on decisions in this task. After completing a monetary incentive task to measure reward anticipation, participants completed short-term memory task trials where they could choose to encode either fewer (low effort/reward) or more (high effort/reward) squares before reporting whether or not the color of a target square matched the square previously in that location. We found that only greater short-term memory ability predicted whether participants chose a much higher proportion of high versus low effort trials. Drift diffusion modeling showed that high effort group participants were more biased than low effort group participants toward selecting high effort trials. Our findings highlight the role of individual differences in cognitive effort ability in explaining cognitive effort deployment choices.

References

  1. Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;132(2):75-87 [PMID: 29481101]
  2. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Aug;22:106-113 [PMID: 30349872]
  3. Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40 [PMID: 23889930]
  4. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 15;12(1):1030 [PMID: 33589626]
  5. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep 27;19(10):1286-91 [PMID: 27669989]
  6. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6598 [PMID: 19672310]
  7. J Psychopharmacol. 2020 Apr;34(4):452-466 [PMID: 31913079]
  8. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):575-603 [PMID: 22858684]
  9. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):553-8 [PMID: 22775583]
  10. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;7:140 [PMID: 23616756]
  11. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jul 10;12:134 [PMID: 30057529]
  12. Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1138 [PMID: 31178787]
  13. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):320-30 [PMID: 24887405]
  14. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203 [PMID: 30734206]
  15. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):51-60 [PMID: 21842963]
  16. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct-Dec;35(4):416-31 [PMID: 24402217]
  17. Cognition. 2023 Jul;236:105418 [PMID: 36871398]
  18. Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(6):889-904 [PMID: 28889803]
  19. Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Feb;53(3):852-860 [PMID: 32810880]
  20. Comput Psychiatr. 2017 Oct 01;1:24-57 [PMID: 29601060]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):324-30 [PMID: 21331668]
  22. Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):1970-1985 [PMID: 32564130]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13549-13554 [PMID: 29203671]
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82 [PMID: 20853993]
  25. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Nov 1;21(11):1049-1065 [PMID: 30239762]
  26. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Jan;147:105953 [PMID: 36334546]
  27. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123073 [PMID: 25875640]
  28. Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78 [PMID: 3226885]
  29. Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81 [PMID: 9384378]
  30. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):692-714 [PMID: 30980339]
  31. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 15;86(6):421-432 [PMID: 31221426]
  32. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210 [PMID: 23894295]
  33. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:371-381 [PMID: 31047891]
  34. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 May;241(5):947-962 [PMID: 38172238]
  35. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;21(3):249-259 [PMID: 31749649]
  36. Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):21-29 [PMID: 31961173]
  37. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):307-334 [PMID: 27357955]
  38. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jul;37(8):1825-37 [PMID: 22453140]
  39. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):429-36 [PMID: 21047157]
  40. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 4;6(1):4 [PMID: 33538943]
  41. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1529-38 [PMID: 25596594]
  42. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Sep;18(9):547-558 [PMID: 28655882]
  43. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 May;234(9-10):1451-1465 [PMID: 28224183]
  44. Behav Ther. 2016 Sep;47(5):600-621 [PMID: 27816074]
  45. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jan;46(1):77-103 [PMID: 30998072]
  46. Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366 [PMID: 32193325]
  47. Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:101-106 [PMID: 29247878]
  48. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 May;151:25-34 [PMID: 32032624]
  49. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Aug 1;30(4):307-314 [PMID: 34675454]
  50. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14 [PMID: 22773897]
  51. eNeuro. 2023 Feb 6;10(2): [PMID: 36717265]
  52. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Aug;45(9):1448-1453 [PMID: 32268344]
  53. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 3;79(Pt B):136-154 [PMID: 28642080]
  54. J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3707-3720 [PMID: 33707296]
  55. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:182-190 [PMID: 36341803]
  56. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):109-19 [PMID: 26250147]
  57. J Psychosom Res. 1993 Jan;37(1):19-32 [PMID: 8421257]

MeSH Term

Humans
Reward
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Female
Young Adult
Adult
Adolescent
Cognition
Individuality
Anticipation, Psychological
Motivation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effortrewardcognitivetaskshort-termmemoryparticipantshighwhetherlowindividualdifferencesabilitydeploymenttrialsdepressionchronicstressfactorsanticipationhighereffort/rewardsquaregroupmustoftendeciderequiredworthPastrodentworksuggestswillingnessdeploycandrivenperceivedvalueHowevermanydrivingdeployment-suchability-cannoteasilycapturedrodentsFurthermorefullyunderstandimpactexaminedpredictonlinevisualUndergraduategroupedgroups���=���348���=���81���=���332���=���92���=���2037���=���16-42baseddecisionscompletingmonetaryincentivemeasurecompletedchooseencodeeitherfewersquaresreportingcolortargetmatchedpreviouslylocationfoundgreaterpredictedchosemuchproportionversusDriftdiffusionmodelingshowedbiasedtowardselectingfindingshighlightroleexplainingchoicesShort-TermMemoryCapacityPredictsWillingnessExpendCognitiveEffortReward

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.