Association between work from home and health-related productivity loss among Korean employees.

Hyo Jeong Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Jaesung Choi, Yun-Chul Hong, Mo-Yeol Kang
Author Information
  1. Hyo Jeong Kim: Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  2. Dong Wook Lee: Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University, Incheon, Korea. ORCID
  3. Jaesung Choi: Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  4. Yun-Chul Hong: Department of Human Systems Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  5. Mo-Yeol Kang: Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. ORCID

Abstract

Background: After the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the widespread adoption of working from home, or teleworking, has prompted extensive research regarding its effects on work productivity and the physical and mental health of employees. In this context, our study aimed to investigate the association between working from home and health-related productivity loss (HRPL).
Methods: An online survey was conducted with a sample of 1,078 workers. HRPL was estimated by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health version. Workers that have been working from home in the last 6 months were categorized into the "work from home" group. Generalized linear models were used to compare the mean difference of HRPL between "work from home" and "commuters" group. Stratified analyses were conducted based on various factors including gender, age, income level, occupation, education level, previous diagnosis of chronic disease, presence of preschool children, living in studio apartment, living alone, commuting time, working hours and regular exercise.
Results: The overall HRPL was higher in the "work from home" group than in the "commuters" group with a mean difference of 4.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-8.01). In the stratified analyses, significant differences were observed in workers with chronic diseases (mean difference: 8.23, 95% CI: 0.38-16.09), who do not live alone (mean difference: 4.84, 95% CI: 0.35-9.33), and workers that do not exercise regularly (mean difference: 4.96, 95% CI: 0.12-9.80).
Conclusions: Working from home is associated with an increased HRPL in the Korean working population, especially among those with chronic diseases, those who do not live alone, and those who do not exercise regularly.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14): [PMID: 34300042]
  2. Am J Health Promot. 2016 Nov;30(8):604-612 [PMID: 26389981]
  3. Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023009 [PMID: 36596733]
  4. Soc Indic Res. 2020;151(2):383-402 [PMID: 33029037]
  5. BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1825 [PMID: 33256652]
  6. J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Feb 1;65(2):98-103 [PMID: 36221302]
  7. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12242 [PMID: 34181307]
  8. Am J Manag Care. 2007 Apr;13(4):211-7 [PMID: 17408341]
  9. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;43(2):81-3 [PMID: 19050003]
  10. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12212 [PMID: 33683779]
  11. J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Apr 1;65(4):277-283 [PMID: 36729620]
  12. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jul 31;35:e28 [PMID: 37701489]
  13. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):797-804 [PMID: 34036369]
  14. Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Dec;14:100377 [PMID: 34549078]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 24;18(11): [PMID: 34073863]
  16. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jul 1;63(7):e426-e432 [PMID: 33883531]
  17. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Sep;15:100657 [PMID: 35959093]
  18. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):115-127 [PMID: 27054501]
  19. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jul;59(7):e138-e144 [PMID: 28590272]
  20. Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;:1-12 [PMID: 35382038]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):47 [PMID: 34996400]
  22. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:730969 [PMID: 34659039]
  23. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65 [PMID: 10146874]
  24. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):99-108 [PMID: 34841434]
  25. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;59(10):e180-e186 [PMID: 28820860]
  26. J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12331 [PMID: 35507292]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workinghomeHRPLmeangroup95%0productivityworkers"workhome"chronicaloneexercise4difference:CI:diseaseworkemployeeshealth-relatedlossconducteddifference"commuters"analyseslevellivingdiseasesliveregularlyKoreanamongBackground:coronavirus2019pandemicwidespreadadoptionteleworkingpromptedextensiveresearchregardingeffectsphysicalmentalhealthcontextstudyaimedinvestigateassociationMethods:onlinesurveysample1078estimatedWorkProductivityActivityImpairmentQuestionnaire:GeneralHealthversionWorkerslast6monthscategorizedGeneralizedlinearmodelsusedcompareStratifiedbasedvariousfactorsincludinggenderageincomeoccupationeducationpreviousdiagnosispresencepreschoolchildrenstudioapartmentcommutingtimehoursregularResults:overallhigher05confidenceinterval[CI]:09-801stratifiedsignificantdifferencesobserved82338-16098435-9339612-980Conclusions:WorkingassociatedincreasedpopulationespeciallyAssociationAbsenteeismPresenteeismRemoteTelework

Similar Articles

Cited By