Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Rural and Urban Females, From 2019 to 2022.

Tyrone F Borders, Amanda Thaxton Wiggins
Author Information
  1. Tyrone F Borders: Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
  2. Amanda Thaxton Wiggins: College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Abstract

Importance: Little nationally representative research has examined Papanicolaou testing rates from before the pandemic in 2019 through the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022. Papanicolaou testing rates among rural females are a concern as they have historically had lower screening rates than their urban counterparts.
Objective: To examine the receipt of a Papanicolaou test in the past year among US females overall and females residing in rural and urban areas in 2019, 2020, and 2022.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used data from 3 years of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey that asks respondents about cancer screenings, sources of health information, and health and health care technologies. Study participants were females aged 21 to 65 years. Individuals who received a Papanicolaou test more than 1 to 3 years prior to a HINTS interview were excluded as they were likely not due for a Papanicolaou test.
Exposures: Survey year (2019, 2020, and 2022) and rural or urban residence were the main exposure variables.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported receipt of a Papanicolaou test within the past year.
Results: Among the 188 243 531 (weighted; 3706 unweighted) females included in the analysis, 12.5% lived in rural areas and 87.5% in urban areas. Participants had a mean (SE) age of 43.7 (0.27) years and were of Hispanic (18.8%), non-Hispanic Asian (5.2%), non-Hispanic Black (12.2%), non-Hispanic White (59.6%), or non-Hispanic other (4.1%) race and ethnicity. In 2022, unadjusted past-year Papanicolaou testing rates were significantly lower among rural vs urban residents (48.6% [95% CI, 39.2%-58.1%] vs 64.0% [95% CI, 60.0%-68.0%]; P < .001). Adjusted odds of past-year Papanicolaou testing were lower in 2022 than 2019 (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02).
Conclusions and Relevance: This repeated cross-sectional study found that past-year Papanicolaou testing rates were lower in 2022 than 2019, pointing to a need to increase access to screenings to prevent an uptick in cervical cancer incidence. Rural-vs-urban differences in 2022 indicate a need to specifically target rural females.

References

  1. J Rural Health. 2023 Sep;39(4):765-771 [PMID: 36869430]
  2. Womens Health Issues. 2017 Nov - Dec;27(6):683-691 [PMID: 29108988]
  3. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 06;16:E70 [PMID: 31172917]
  4. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218373 [PMID: 33914050]
  5. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1265-1274 [PMID: 28751476]
  6. Soc Work Public Health. 2017;32(5):311-323 [PMID: 28409674]
  7. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 15;169(6):756-60 [PMID: 19211620]
  8. Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):17-17j [PMID: 31038687]
  9. Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106596 [PMID: 34217415]
  10. Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106559 [PMID: 34217410]
  11. JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686 [PMID: 30140884]
  12. J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):213-216 [PMID: 33730899]
  13. JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Sep 3;2(9):e212487 [PMID: 35977184]
  14. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 17;3(6):e221632 [PMID: 35977241]
  15. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jun;18(6):e1045-e1055 [PMID: 35254884]
  16. J Community Health. 2012 Feb;37(1):217-23 [PMID: 21773819]
  17. J Rural Health. 2022 Mar;38(2):409-415 [PMID: 34506669]
  18. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jan;41(1):129-137 [PMID: 34982628]
  19. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215490 [PMID: 35657622]
  20. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 1;25(5):10-16 [PMID: 34533527]
  21. Prev Med. 2021 Mar;144:106400 [PMID: 33388330]
  22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Middle Aged
Adult
Early Detection of Cancer
Cross-Sectional Studies
Rural Population
Papanicolaou Test
Urban Population
Aged
United States
COVID-19
Young Adult
Vaginal Smears
SARS-CoV-2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Papanicolaou20222019ruralfemalestestingratesurbanlowertestyearsnon-Hispanicamongyearareashealth0past-yearCInationallyrepresentativepandemicreceiptpast2020repeatedcross-sectionalstudy3SurveyHINTScancerscreeningsAmong125%2%6%vs[95%oddsneedImportance:LittleresearchexaminedCOVID-19concernhistoricallyscreeningcounterpartsObjective:examineUSoverallresidingDesignSettingParticipants:useddataHealthInformationNationalTrendssurveyasksrespondentssourcesinformationcaretechnologiesStudyparticipantsaged2165Individualsreceived1priorinterviewexcludedlikelydueExposures:residencemainexposurevariablesMainOutcomesMeasures:Self-reportedwithinResults:188 243 531weighted3706unweightedincludedanalysislived87ParticipantsmeanSEage43727Hispanic188%Asian5BlackWhite5941%raceethnicityunadjustedsignificantlyresidents48392%-581%]640%600%-680%]P <001Adjustedratio7095%52-095P = 02ConclusionsRelevance:foundpointingincreaseaccesspreventuptickcervicalincidenceRural-vs-urbandifferencesindicatespecificallytargetCervicalCancerScreeningRatesRuralUrbanFemales

Similar Articles

Cited By