Assessing Risk Literacy Skills: Enhancing Healthcare Management among University Students.

Diane Dolezel, Ramalingam Shanmugam, Brad Beauvais
Author Information
  1. Diane Dolezel: Health Informatics & Information Management Department, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX 78665, USA. ORCID
  2. Ramalingam Shanmugam: School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA. ORCID
  3. Brad Beauvais: School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA. ORCID

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the determinants of risk literacy among university students in the United States by utilizing the Berlin Numeracy Test. Risk literacy skills are essential for decision-making and communication of risks, but few studies consider university students. This study aims to evaluate the association of sociodemographic factors with individual risk literacy levels. An observational cross-sectional survey study was used with a convenience sample of 184 undergraduate and graduate university students. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences for demographics at risk for negative outcomes associated with lower risk literacy. For this group of students, the majority had below-average numeracy. These findings can guide healthcare professionals to focus on college-age individuals with low-risk literacy scores to enhance patient understanding, facilitate communication, and promote healthier behaviors.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241844 [PMID: 33175891]
  2. J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2:24-33 [PMID: 26513028]
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161 [PMID: 26879804]
  4. J Am Coll Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(5):491-8 [PMID: 20304761]
  5. J Aging Health. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):33-41 [PMID: 30261796]
  6. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 3;14(7):e0218821 [PMID: 31269051]
  7. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10 [PMID: 7738325]
  8. J Am Coll Health. 2020 Apr;68(3):242-249 [PMID: 30457454]
  9. Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):138-148 [PMID: 34598308]
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46 [PMID: 18490687]
  11. Clin Gerontol. 2020 Mar-Apr;43(2):221-232 [PMID: 29733753]
  12. Med Decis Making. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):37-44 [PMID: 11206945]
  13. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:30-54 [PMID: 23030560]
  14. Health Educ Behav. 2009 Dec;36(6):1065-81 [PMID: 19834054]
  15. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):1401 [PMID: 31664973]
  16. BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 14;21(1):143 [PMID: 32664885]
  17. Int J Psychol. 2020 Apr;55(2):273-281 [PMID: 30690731]
  18. Heart Lung. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):417-424 [PMID: 33618148]
  19. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Feb;20(2):175-84 [PMID: 15836552]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0literacyriskstudentsstudyuniversityamongBerlinNumeracyTestRiskcommunicationnumeracypurposeexploredeterminantsUnitedStatesutilizingskillsessentialdecision-makingrisksstudiesconsideraimsevaluateassociationsociodemographicfactorsindividuallevelsobservationalcross-sectionalsurveyusedconveniencesample184undergraduategraduateStatisticalanalysisrevealedsignificantdifferencesdemographicsnegativeoutcomesassociatedlowergroupmajoritybelow-averagefindingscanguidehealthcareprofessionalsfocuscollege-ageindividualslow-riskscoresenhancepatientunderstandingfacilitatepromotehealthierbehaviorsAssessingLiteracySkills:EnhancingHealthcareManagementUniversityStudentscollegedecisionmaking

Similar Articles

Cited By