Carotid Arterial Compliance during Different Intensities of Submaximal Endurance Exercise.

Alvaro N Gurovich, Samuel Montalvo, Progga F Hassan, Manuel Gomez
Author Information
  1. Alvaro N Gurovich: Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. ORCID
  2. Samuel Montalvo: Wu-Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. ORCID
  3. Progga F Hassan: Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
  4. Manuel Gomez: Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the elastic characteristics of the common carotid artery (CCA) during endurance exercise at 3 different intensities. : Twenty young healthy participants (10 males and 10 females) participated in this quasi-experimental cross-sectional study. Participants were tested in two sessions: (1) we took resting measurements of the elastic characteristics of the CCA and performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer to determine submaximal exercise intensities, and we conducted (2) measurements of the elastic characteristics of the CCA while exercising in a cycle ergometer at 3 intensities based on blood lactate levels of low (<2 mmol/L), moderate (2-4 mmol/L), and high (>4 mmol/L). Beta stiffness was calculated using CCA diameters during systole and diastole, measured with high-definition ultrasound imaging, and CCA systolic and diastolic pressures were measured via applanation tonometry. : Overall, there were no differences between males and females in terms of any of the studied variables ( > 0.05). In addition, no significant changes were found in the CCA beta stiffness and vessel diameter ( > 0.05) between exercise intensities. There was a significant exercise intensity effect on CCA systolic pressure ( < 0.05), but not on CCA diastolic pressure ( > 0.05). : The biomechanical characteristics of the CCA, determined via compliance and beta-stiffness, do not change during cyclical aerobic exercise, regardless of exercise intensity.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Apr;15(2):149-55 [PMID: 18391640]
  2. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2021 Nov;41(6):471-479 [PMID: 34275183]
  3. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:2907548 [PMID: 30112375]
  4. J Physiol. 2004 Dec 15;561(Pt 3):893-901 [PMID: 15498809]
  5. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;37(5):263-271 [PMID: 34570024]
  6. J Physiol. 2011 Mar 1;589(Pt 5):1209-20 [PMID: 21224235]
  7. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010 Jan;235(1):111-8 [PMID: 20404025]
  8. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009 Nov;24(6):580-90 [PMID: 19809311]
  9. Angiology. 2011 Jan;62(1):33-7 [PMID: 21134994]
  10. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 08;2020:9027560 [PMID: 33224984]
  11. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1219-1236 [PMID: 32812149]
  12. J Hum Hypertens. 2014 May;28(5):303-9 [PMID: 24172292]
  13. Sports Med. 2020 Oct;50(10):1729-1756 [PMID: 32729096]
  14. Front Physiol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1348811 [PMID: 38468701]
  15. Circulation. 2006 Jun 13;113(23):2744-53 [PMID: 16754802]
  16. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1307-1316 [PMID: 32149879]
  17. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20): [PMID: 33076218]
  18. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 14;10(2): [PMID: 33466830]
  19. Circulation. 2008 Feb 26;117(8):993-1002 [PMID: 18250270]
  20. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 01;13(4):1305-1316 [PMID: 33042374]
  21. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Jan;6(1):16-26 [PMID: 19029993]
  22. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 21;12(8): [PMID: 37109380]
  23. Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596 [PMID: 31992061]
  24. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Jun;98(6):2287-91 [PMID: 15718412]
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Mar 1;130(3):827-835 [PMID: 33356982]
  26. Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 13;9:73 [PMID: 29487535]
  27. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1270-5 [PMID: 10982542]
  28. Circulation. 1989 Jul;80(1):78-86 [PMID: 2610739]
  29. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9205 [PMID: 32514128]
  30. Physiol Rev. 2015 Apr;95(2):549-601 [PMID: 25834232]

Grants

  1. 1SC2GM140952-03A1/NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CCAexercisecharacteristicsintensities005elastic:mmol/Lstiffness>determine310malesfemalesmeasurementscycleergometermeasuredultrasoundsystolicdiastolicviatonometrysignificantintensitypressurepurposeinvestigationcommoncarotidarteryendurancedifferentTwentyyounghealthyparticipantsparticipatedquasi-experimentalcross-sectionalstudyParticipantstestedtwosessions:1tookrestingperformedcardiopulmonarytestCPETsubmaximalconducted2exercisingbasedbloodlactatelevelslow<2moderate2-4high>4Betacalculatedusingdiameterssystolediastolehigh-definitionimagingpressuresapplanationOveralldifferencestermsstudiedvariablesadditionchangesfoundbetavesseldiametereffect<biomechanicaldeterminedcompliancebeta-stiffnesschangecyclicalaerobicregardlessCarotidArterialComplianceDifferentIntensitiesSubmaximalEnduranceExercisearterialstrokepreventionvascularfunction

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)