Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Feasibility, Efficacy and Safety-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Francisca Ramalho-Vasconcelos, Raquel Gomes, Raquel Bou��a-Machado, Marisa Aral, Jorge Nogueiro, Tiago Bou��a-Machado, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Hugo Santos-Sousa
Author Information
  1. Francisca Ramalho-Vasconcelos: Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  2. Raquel Gomes: Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  3. Raquel Bou��a-Machado: Instituto de Medicina Molecular Jo��o Lobo Antunes-Edif��cio Egas Moniz, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. ORCID
  4. Marisa Aral: S��o Jo��o Local Health Unit, Surgery Department, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
  5. Jorge Nogueiro: S��o Jo��o Local Health Unit, Surgery Department, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  6. Tiago Bou��a-Machado: S��o Jo��o Local Health Unit, Surgery Department, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  7. Bernardo Sousa-Pinto: Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  8. Hugo Santos-Sousa: S��o Jo��o Local Health Unit, Obesity Integrated Responsibility Unit (CRI-O), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ORCID

Abstract

Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emerging technique for delivering chemotherapy directly to the peritoneum via a pressurized aerosol. Its growing attention stems from its effectiveness in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from various primary tumors, with gastric cancer (GC) being among the most prevalent. This study aimed to systematically investigate PIPAC's therapeutic role in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM). The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Pubmed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The meta-analysis of relative risks and mean differences compared patients undergoing one or two PIPAC sessions with those completing three or more, assessing various outcomes. Eighteen studies underwent qualitative analysis, and four underwent quantitative analysis. Patients with three or more PIPAC procedures had shorter hospital stays (MD = -1.2; 95%CI (-1.9; -0.5); < 0.001), higher rates of histopathological response (RR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.08; 2.90; = 0.023), and significantly improved overall survival (MD = 6.0; 95%CI 4.2; 7.8; < 0.001). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. PIPAC demonstrated efficacy in carefully selected patients, enhancing histopathologic response rates and overall survival without prolonging hospital stays. This study underscores the necessity for randomized controlled trials and precise selection criteria to refine PIPAC's implementation in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 31;8(44):78208-78224 [PMID: 29100461]
  2. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):669-678 [PMID: 28407227]
  3. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Nov;22(5):1314 [PMID: 34630668]
  4. World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;19(1):236 [PMID: 34376191]
  5. Pleura Peritoneum. 2021 Sep 27;6(3):eA1-eA78 [PMID: 34676288]
  6. Pleura Peritoneum. 2016 Sep 1;1(3):159-166 [PMID: 30911619]
  7. Pleura Peritoneum. 2022 Apr 21;7(2):39-49 [PMID: 35812010]
  8. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359-74 [PMID: 8849962]
  9. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Dec;53(4):971-979 [PMID: 34677795]
  10. Pleura Peritoneum. 2019 Mar 05;4(1):20180127 [PMID: 31198852]
  11. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 May 13;11:1758835919846402 [PMID: 31205501]
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1709-1719 [PMID: 27743922]
  13. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):155-159 [PMID: 31493986]
  14. Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 23;14(10): [PMID: 35626160]
  15. Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:270-275 [PMID: 32891341]
  16. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):128-133 [PMID: 31253545]
  17. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4433-4441 [PMID: 36867174]
  18. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;15(6): [PMID: 36980663]
  19. Br J Surg. 2022 Dec 13;110(1):10-18 [PMID: 36056893]
  20. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 28;59(2): [PMID: 36837456]
  21. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  22. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7528-7537 [PMID: 35930109]
  23. J Gastric Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(4):379-391 [PMID: 30607301]
  24. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2005 Feb 08;2(1):3 [PMID: 15701175]
  25. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S20-S29 [PMID: 33968423]
  26. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):123-127 [PMID: 32561204]
  27. Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;10:610572 [PMID: 33912438]
  28. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):242-6 [PMID: 19638909]
  29. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;14(3): [PMID: 35158837]
  30. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;45(12):2386-2391 [PMID: 31092362]
  31. Visc Med. 2022 Apr;38(2):90-98 [PMID: 35614892]
  32. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):112-123 [PMID: 34611790]
  33. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):553-9 [PMID: 24006094]
  34. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(8):2615-2621 [PMID: 31115852]
  35. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S259-S270 [PMID: 33968442]
  36. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul;20(7):e368-e377 [PMID: 31267971]
  37. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2019 Feb;36(1):1-14 [PMID: 30715654]
  38. Histopathology. 2019 Jun;74(7):1014-1024 [PMID: 30687944]
  39. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Jun;54(2):632-641 [PMID: 35778645]
  40. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep 27;14(1):253 [PMID: 27678344]
  41. BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):206-215 [PMID: 31957257]
  42. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 09;15(4): [PMID: 36831468]
  43. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1849-55 [PMID: 22580869]
  44. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Jul;27(3):519-537 [PMID: 29935687]
  45. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3905-15 [PMID: 24744580]
  46. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 06;12(4): [PMID: 36835824]
  47. Pleura Peritoneum. 2018 Nov 27;3(4):20180128 [PMID: 30911669]
  48. South Asian J Cancer. 2019 Jan-Mar;8(1):27-30 [PMID: 30766848]
  49. Pleura Peritoneum. 2016 Jun 1;1(2):99-107 [PMID: 30911613]
  50. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb;20(2):367-73 [PMID: 26511950]
  51. BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):105 [PMID: 32041558]
  52. Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1005-1020 [PMID: 35914639]
  53. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Dec;180:103846 [PMID: 36257535]
  54. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(1):24-30 [PMID: 30948867]
  55. Biomedicines. 2020 Apr 30;8(5): [PMID: 32365877]
  56. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;14(6): [PMID: 35326595]
  57. Front Oncol. 2022 May 26;12:864647 [PMID: 35719946]
  58. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Jun 01;10:1758835918777036 [PMID: 29899763]
  59. Med Hypotheses. 2015 Oct;85(4):480-4 [PMID: 26277656]
  60. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020 Apr;37(2):325-332 [PMID: 32002724]
  61. Pleura Peritoneum. 2018 Jun 09;3(2):20180108 [PMID: 30911656]
  62. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Oct 24;2018:2743985 [PMID: 30473706]
  63. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Feb;63(2):242-255 [PMID: 31914116]
  64. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 20;12(1): [PMID: 31877647]
  65. EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 21;47:101404 [PMID: 35497064]
  66. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):243-257 [PMID: 29869089]
  67. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2634-2644 [PMID: 36602663]
  68. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S242-S258 [PMID: 33968441]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PIPACgastricperitonealcancer=0PressurizedIntraperitonealAerosolChemotherapymeta-analysis295%CIcarcinomatosisvariousstudyPIPAC'smetastasissystematicreviewdifferencespatientsthreeoutcomesunderwentanalysishospitalstaysMD-1<001ratesresponse1overallsurvivalemergingtechniquedeliveringchemotherapydirectlyperitoneumviapressurizedaerosolgrowingattentionstemseffectivenesstreatingPCoriginatingprimarytumorsGCamongprevalentaimedsystematicallyinvestigatetherapeuticroleGCPMfollowedPRISMA2020guidelinessearchingPubmedWebScienceSCOPUSdatabasesrelativerisksmeancomparedundergoingonetwosessionscompletingassessingEighteenstudiesqualitativefourquantitativePatientsproceduresshorter9-05higherhistopathologicalRR770890023significantlyimproved6478showedsignificantdemonstratedefficacycarefullyselectedenhancinghistopathologicwithoutprolongingunderscoresnecessityrandomizedcontrolledtrialspreciseselectioncriteriarefineimplementationclinicalpracticeTreatmentGastricCancer:FeasibilityEfficacySafety-ASystematicReviewMeta-Analysisadenocarcinomaneoplasmstomach

Similar Articles

Cited By