Does female control and male mating system predict courtship investment and mating outcomes? A comparative study in five widow spider species (genus Latrodectus) tested under similar laboratory conditions.

Luciana Baruffaldi, Maydianne C B Andrade
Author Information
  1. Luciana Baruffaldi: Departments of Biological Sciences and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada. l.baruffaldi@utoronto.ca.
  2. Maydianne C B Andrade: Departments of Biological Sciences and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Male courtship investment may evolve in response to the male's expectation of future mating opportunities or the degree of female control during mating interactions. We used a comparative approach to test this hypotheses by assessing the courtship and mating behaviors of five widow spider species (genus Latrodectus) under common laboratory conditions. We predicted male investment in courtship would be higher in species where males mate only once because of high cannibalism rates (monogyny, L. geometricus, L. hasselti, L. mirabilis), compared to species with rare cannibalism (L. mactans, L. hesperus) in which males should reserve energy for future mating opportunities. Increased male investment, measured as courtship duration, might also evolve with increased female control over mating outcomes if females prefer longer courtships. We tested this by assessing the frequency of copulations, timing of sexual cannibalism, and the degree of female-biased size dimorphism, which is expected to be negatively correlated with the energetic cost of rebuffing male mating attempts.
RESULTS: Copulation frequency was consistently lower in species with extreme female-skewed size dimorphism, and where sexual cannibalism was more prevalent, suggesting the importance of female control for mating outcomes. We confirmed significant interspecific variation in average courtship duration, but contrary to predictions, it was not predicted by male mating system, and there was no consistent link between courtship duration and sexual size dimorphism.
CONCLUSION: We show that the degree of sexual dimorphism is not only correlated with sexual cannibalism, but also with mating success since restriction of male copulation frequency by female Latrodectus affects paternity. However, predictions about male mating system or female control affecting courtship duration were not supported. We propose that the form of female control over mating and cannibalism, and male responses, might be more informative for understanding the evolution of courtship duration. For example, male tactics to avoid female aggression may drive lower courtship duration in species like L. mirabilis. Nonetheless, our results differ from inferences based on published studies of each species in isolation, illuminating the need for standardized data collection for behavioural comparative studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Am Nat. 2021 Apr;197(4):461-472 [PMID: 33755533]
  2. Am Nat. 2008 Sep;172(3):431-40 [PMID: 18616388]
  3. Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:57-80 [PMID: 31573828]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 7;275(1630):77-82 [PMID: 17956845]
  5. Nat Methods. 2014 Jun;11(6):629-32 [PMID: 24776635]
  6. J Insect Physiol. 2015 Jan;72:35-42 [PMID: 25456451]
  7. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Sep 11;6(11):a017731 [PMID: 25213095]
  8. Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):R744-54 [PMID: 16950101]
  9. Insects. 2021 Sep 14;12(9): [PMID: 34564265]
  10. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Jun;31(3):1127-42 [PMID: 15120405]
  11. BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Feb 13;15:18 [PMID: 25886749]
  12. Biol Lett. 2016 Sep;12(9): [PMID: 27651535]
  13. Naturwissenschaften. 2020 Jan 3;107(1):6 [PMID: 31900596]
  14. Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1670-2 [PMID: 10356397]
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):585-92 [PMID: 19864292]
  16. Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 03;10(3): [PMID: 33802370]
  17. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):17322 [PMID: 29229932]
  18. Evolution. 2004 Sep;58(9):1947-70 [PMID: 15521454]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1139-44 [PMID: 16024375]
  20. Behav Processes. 2021 Jul;188:104406 [PMID: 33895251]
  21. Am Nat. 2000 Oct;156(4):368-377 [PMID: 29592138]
  22. J Morphol. 2005 Jan;263(1):118-32 [PMID: 15562503]
  23. Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 4;16(7):R242-3 [PMID: 16581497]
  24. Lab Anim. 2009 Oct;43(4):311-27 [PMID: 19505937]
  25. Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):838-47 [PMID: 21676835]
  26. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 26;5:16928 [PMID: 26607497]
  27. Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 07;10(11): [PMID: 31703321]
  28. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018 Jun;27:52-60 [PMID: 30025635]
  29. Front Zool. 2014 Jan 17;11(1):4 [PMID: 24433544]
  30. Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;286(1908):20191470 [PMID: 31362641]

Grants

  1. 2022-03597/Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

MeSH Term

Animals
Male
Female
Spiders
Cannibalism
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Courtship
Sex Characteristics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0matingcourtshipmalefemalecontrolspeciescannibalismLdurationinvestmentsexualdimorphismdegreecomparativeLatrodectusfrequencysizesystemMalemayevolvefutureopportunitiesassessingfivewidowspidergenuslaboratoryconditionspredictedmalesmirabilismightalsooutcomestestedcorrelatedlowerpredictionsstudiesstudyBACKGROUND:responsemale'sexpectationinteractionsusedapproachtesthypothesesbehaviorscommonhighermatehighratesmonogynygeometricushasselticomparedraremactanshesperusreserveenergyIncreasedmeasuredincreasedfemalespreferlongercourtshipscopulationstimingfemale-biasedexpectednegativelyenergeticcostrebuffingattemptsRESULTS:Copulationconsistentlyextremefemale-skewedprevalentsuggestingimportanceconfirmedsignificantinterspecificvariationaveragecontraryconsistentlinkCONCLUSION:showsuccesssincerestrictioncopulationaffectspaternityHoweveraffectingsupportedproposeformresponsesinformativeunderstandingevolutionexampletacticsavoidaggressiondrivelikeNonethelessresultsdifferinferencesbasedpublishedisolationilluminatingneedstandardizeddatacollectionbehaviouralpredictoutcomes?similarFemaleInterspecificSexualconflict

Similar Articles

Cited By